Literature DB >> 2927183

Expected utility theory and risky choices with health outcomes.

F J Hellinger1.   

Abstract

Studies of people's attitude towards risk in the health sector often involve a comparison of the desirability of alternative medical treatments. Since the outcome of a medical treatment cannot be known with certainty, patients and physicians must make a choice that involves risk. Each medical treatment may be characterized as a gamble (or risky option) with a set of outcomes and associated probabilities. Expected utility theory (EUT) is the standard method to predict people's choices under uncertainty. The author presents the results of a survey that suggests people are very risk averse towards gambles involving health-related outcomes. The survey also indicates that there is significant variability in the risk attitudes across individuals for any given gamble and that there is significant variability in the risk attitudes of a given individual across gambles. The variability of risk attitudes of a given individual suggests that risk attitudes are not absolute but are functions of the parameters in the gamble.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2927183     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198903000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  Predictors of risk tolerance among oral surgery patients.

Authors:  Kathryn A Atchison; Claudia Der-Martirosian; Thomas R Belin; Edward E Black; Melanie W Gironda
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Utility Estimation for Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux: Methodological Considerations Using an Online Survey Platform.

Authors:  Rohit Tejwani; Hsin-Hsiao S Wang; Jessica C Lloyd; Paul J Kokorowski; Caleb P Nelson; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Predictors of treatment preference for mandibular fracture.

Authors:  Claudia Der-Martirosian; Melanie W Gironda; Edward E Black; Thomas R Belin; Kathryn A Atchison
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.821

4.  Development of the Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision Framework: A Context-Specific Expansion of the Risk-as-Feelings Hypothesis.

Authors:  Otis L Owens; Robin M Dawson; Tracey Thomas
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 5.  Patients' preferences for coronary revascularization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto da Silva Magliano; Andrea Libório Monteiro; Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira Rebelo; Claudia Cristina de Aguiar Pereira
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Pediatric Vaccines and Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: How Much is Too Much to Pay for Prevention?

Authors:  Jordan Amdahl; Derek Weycker; Ray Farkouh; Liping Huang; Caitlin Eichten; Gerry Oster
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2020-11-10

7.  How should the impact of different presentations of treatment effects on patient choice be evaluated? A pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Cheryl Carling; Doris Tove Kristoffersen; Jeph Herrin; Shaun Treweek; Andrew D Oxman; Holger Schünemann; Elie A Akl; Victor Montori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.