Literature DB >> 29271495

A novel method to measure mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: Feasibility and validation.

Hani M Mahmoud Elsayed1, Mohamed Hassan2, Michael Nagy1, Alaaeldin Amin1,2, Ahmed Elguindy1, Kerolos Wagdy1, Magdi Yacoub3,4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Neither two- nor three-dimensional (3D) planimetry of the mitral valve (MV) orifice takes the mitral commissures into account. Thus, if the commissures are not completely fused, the MV orifice will not be planar, and MV area (MVA) will be underestimated. The study aimed to validate a novel method for measurement of the MVA using a software that traces the MV orifice including the commissures. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study included 30 patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty for severe rheumatic mitral stenosis. All performed 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) immediately before the procedure. MVA was measured using the mitral valve navigation (MVN) software of the Philips Q-Lab 10.2 in a diastolic frame with maximum diastolic opening of the MV. Regular 3D planimetry of the MV orifice was also performed. Before balloon dilation, the MVA was calculated invasively using the Gorlin's formula. No significant difference was detected between MVN-derived MVA and Gorlin-derived MVA (0.98 cm2 vs. 1.0 cm2 , P = .33). A statistically significant difference was detected between Planimetry-derived MVA and Gorlin-derived MVA (0.8 cm2 vs. 1.0 cm2 , P < .001). There were significant linear correlations between MVN-derived MVA and Gorlin-derived MVA (r = .84, P < .001). Using Bland-Altman analysis, Gorlin-derived MVA showed better and relatively narrower limits of agreement with MVN-derived MVA than planimetry-derived MVA.
CONCLUSION: Measurement of the MVA using the MVN method is feasible and is more correlated to the invasively measured MVA than the 3D planimetry method. This is the most accurate method of measuring the MVA that takes MV commissures into account.
© 2017, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mitral stenosis; mitral valve area; three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29271495     DOI: 10.1111/echo.13786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  4 in total

1.  Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography measurement of mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis: multiplanar reconstruction or 3D direct planimetry?

Authors:  Xinbo Zhong; Wenbin Chen; Zhiyong Shi; Zhifu Huan; Lanxiang Ma; Wei Liu; Xiaohan Yang; Yan Xu; Yong Jiang; Alex Pui-Wai Lee; Ruiqiang Guo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events.

Authors:  C Bleakley; M Eskandari; O Aldalati; K Monschonas; M Huang; A Whittaker; M J Monaghan
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2018-08-23

Review 3.  Meta-Analysis of the Incidence, Prevalence, and Correlates of Atrial Fibrillation in Rheumatic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Jean Jacques Noubiap; Ulrich Flore Nyaga; Aude Laetitia Ndoadoumgue; Jan René Nkeck; Anderson Ngouo; Jean Joel Bigna
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2020-05-18

4.  Impact of 3D echocardiography on grading of mitral stenosis and prediction of clinical events

Authors:  C Bleakley; M Eskandari; O Aldalati; K Moschonas; M Huang; A Whittaker; M J Monaghan
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2018-12-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.