Literature DB >> 29271466

Particles with similar LET values generate DNA breaks of different complexity and reparability: a high-resolution microscopy analysis of γH2AX/53BP1 foci.

Lucie Jezkova1,2, Mariia Zadneprianetc3,4, Elena Kulikova3,4, Elena Smirnova5, Tatiana Bulanova3,4, Daniel Depes6, Iva Falkova6, Alla Boreyko3,4, Evgeny Krasavin3,4, Marie Davidkova7, Stanislav Kozubek6, Olga Valentova2, Martin Falk6.   

Abstract

Biological effects of high-LET (linear energy transfer) radiation have received increasing attention, particularly in the context of more efficient radiotherapy and space exploration. Efficient cell killing by high-LET radiation depends on the physical ability of accelerated particles to generate complex DNA damage, which is largely mediated by LET. However, the characteristics of DNA damage and repair upon exposure to different particles with similar LET parameters remain unexplored. We employed high-resolution confocal microscopy to examine phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX)/p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) focus streaks at the microscale level, focusing on the complexity, spatiotemporal behaviour and repair of DNA double-strand breaks generated by boron and neon ions accelerated at similar LET values (∼135 keV μm-1) and low energies (8 and 47 MeV per n, respectively). Cells were irradiated using sharp-angle geometry and were spatially (3D) fixed to maximize the resolution of these analyses. Both high-LET radiation types generated highly complex γH2AX/53BP1 focus clusters with a larger size, increased irregularity and slower elimination than low-LET γ-rays. Surprisingly, neon ions produced even more complex γH2AX/53BP1 focus clusters than boron ions, consistent with DSB repair kinetics. Although the exposure of cells to γ-rays and boron ions eliminated a vast majority of foci (94% and 74%, respectively) within 24 h, 45% of the foci persisted in cells irradiated with neon. Our calculations suggest that the complexity of DSB damage critically depends on (increases with) the particle track core diameter. Thus, different particles with similar LET and energy may generate different types of DNA damage, which should be considered in future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29271466     DOI: 10.1039/c7nr06829h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  17 in total

1.  Reflections on Basic Science Studies Involving Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation.

Authors:  Tatjana Paunesku; Gayle Woloschak
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 2.  Molecular Signaling in Response to Charged Particle Exposures and its Importance in Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Christine E Hellweg; Arif Ali Chishti; Sebastian Diegeler; Luis F Spitta; Bernd Henschenmacher; Christa Baumstark-Khan
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  Activation of the DNA-repair mechanism through NBS1 and MRE11 diffusion.

Authors:  Ida Friis; Ilia A Solov'yov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Nanostructure of Clustered DNA Damage in Leukocytes after In-Solution Irradiation with the Alpha Emitter Ra-223.

Authors:  Harry Scherthan; Jin-Ho Lee; Emanuel Maus; Sarah Schumann; Razan Muhtadi; Robert Chojowski; Matthias Port; Michael Lassmann; Felix Bestvater; Michael Hausmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Geomagnetic Shielding Enhances Radiation Resistance by Promoting DNA Repair Process in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Xunwen Xue; Yasser F Ali; Caorui Liu; Zhiqiang Hong; Wanrong Luo; Jing Nie; Bingyan Li; Yang Jiao; Ning-Ang Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Challenges and Contradictions of Metal Nano-Particle Applications for Radio-Sensitivity Enhancement in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Eva Pagáčová; Lenka Štefančíková; Franz Schmidt-Kaler; Georg Hildenbrand; Tomáš Vičar; Daniel Depeš; Jin-Ho Lee; Felix Bestvater; Sandrine Lacombe; Erika Porcel; Stéphane Roux; Frederik Wenz; Olga Kopečná; Iva Falková; Michael Hausmann; Martin Falk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  High LET Radiation Overcomes In Vitro Resistance to X-Rays of Chondrosarcoma Cell Lines.

Authors:  Francois Chevalier; Dounia Houria Hamdi; Charlotte Lepleux; Mihaela Temelie; Anaïs Nicol; Jean Baptiste Austry; Paul Lesueur; Guillaume Vares; Diana Savu; Tetsuo Nakajima; Yannick Saintigny
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01

8.  The Impact of Dose Rate on DNA Double-Strand Break Formation and Repair in Human Lymphocytes Exposed to Fast Neutron Irradiation.

Authors:  Shankari Nair; Monique Engelbrecht; Xanthene Miles; Roya Ndimba; Randall Fisher; Peter du Plessis; Julie Bolcaen; Jaime Nieto-Camero; Evan de Kock; Charlot Vandevoorde
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Comparison of High- and Low-LET Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Break Processing in Living Cells.

Authors:  Stefan J Roobol; Irene van den Bent; Wiggert A van Cappellen; Tsion E Abraham; Maarten W Paul; Roland Kanaar; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Dik C van Gent; Jeroen Essers
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Elucidation of the Clustered Nano-Architecture of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Sites and Surrounding Chromatin in Cancer Cells: A Single Molecule Localization Microscopy Approach.

Authors:  Michael Hausmann; Martin Falk; Charlotte Neitzel; Andreas Hofmann; Abin Biswas; Theresa Gier; Iva Falkova; Dieter W Heermann; Georg Hildenbrand
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.