Literature DB >> 29271440

Fate and exposure modeling in regulatory chemical evaluation: new directions from retrospection.

Mark A Bonnell1, Angelika Zidek, Adam Griffiths, Don Gutzman.   

Abstract

The development and application of fate and exposure modeling has undergone fundamental changes over the last 20 years. This has, in part, been driven by different needs within the regulatory community to address chemicals of concern using different approaches. Here we present a retrospective look at fate and exposure model application over the last two decades keeping an international regulatory perspective and using the Government of Canada's Chemicals Management Plan to illustrate concepts. We discuss the important role fate and exposure modeling has played to help address key data gaps when evaluating the risk of chemicals for both human health and ecological reasons. Yet limitations for more widespread model application within a regulatory context remain. Consequently, we identify specific data gaps and regulatory needs with an eye towards new directions for 21st century chemical evaluation. We suggest that one factor limiting greater model application is the need for increased awareness and agreement of what chemical exposure assessment encompasses within the risk assessment paradigm. This is of particular importance today because of the increased availability of computational and high-throughput data and methods for chemical assessment allowing evaluators to potentially examine exposure from site of release to site of toxic action, thus linking exposure with toxicology. We further suggest there is a need for discussion at a global level to promote the awareness of new tools and approaches available for fate and exposure modeling and suggest that this could be organized using the aggregate exposure pathways concept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29271440     DOI: 10.1039/c7em00510e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  4 in total

1.  A Model for Risk-Based Screening and Prioritization of Human Exposure to Chemicals from Near-Field Sources.

Authors:  Li Li; John N Westgate; Lauren Hughes; Xianming Zhang; Babak Givehchi; Liisa Toose; James M Armitage; Frank Wania; Peter Egeghy; Jon A Arnot
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Moving persistence assessments into the 21st century: A role for weight-of-evidence and overall persistence.

Authors:  Aaron D Redman; Jens Bietz; John W Davis; Delina Lyon; Erin Maloney; Amelie Ott; Jens C Otte; Frédéric Palais; John R Parsons; Neil Wang
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Exploring the Environmental Exposure to Methoxychlor, α-HCH and Endosulfan-sulfate Residues in Lake Naivasha (Kenya) Using a Multimedia Fate Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Yasser Abbasi; Chris M Mannaerts
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Development and Evaluation of a Holistic and Mechanistic Modeling Framework for Chemical Emissions, Fate, Exposure, and Risk.

Authors:  Li Li; Alessandro Sangion; Frank Wania; James M Armitage; Liisa Toose; Lauren Hughes; Jon A Arnot
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.