Literature DB >> 29271056

Under-utilisation of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in men with intermediate-high risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy.

Wee Loon Ong1,2, Sue M Evans2, Jeremy L Millar3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost with definitive external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in prostate cancer (CaP) management.
METHODS: The study population comprised men with intermediate-high risk CaP captured in the population-based Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry Victoria (PCOR-Vic), treated with EBRT from January 2010 to December 2015. The primary outcome is the proportion of men who received HDR-BT boost. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the effect of patient-, tumour- and treatment-factors on the likelihood of HDR-BT use. Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) data was accessed to evaluate the Australia-wide pattern of HDR-BT use.
RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred and six patients were included in this study - 886 (49%) intermediate-risk, and 920 (51%) high-risk CaP patients. Overall, only 124 (7%) patients had EBRT + HDR-BT - 47 (5%) intermediate-risk and 77 (8%) high-risk CaP patients (P = 0.01). There is higher proportion of patients who had HDR-BT in public institutions (7% public vs. 3% private, P = 0.005) and in metropolitan centres (9% metropolitan vs. 2% regional, P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, older patients were less likely to have HDR-BT (OR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.89-0.94, P < 0.001), while patients with high-risk CaP (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.3-2.7; P = 0.002) treated in metropolitan centres (OR = 5.0; 95% CI = 2.6-9.8; P < 0.001) and public institutions (OR = 3.8; 95% CI = 1.5-9.4; P = 0.005) were more likely to have EBRT + HDR-BT. There was significant decline in numbers of HDR-BT performed throughout Australia, from 313 cases in 2010 to 125 cases in 2015.
CONCLUSION: High-dose-rate brachytherapy is under-utilised with EBRT in this contemporary population-based cohort of Victorian men with CaP. The decline in HDR-BT use was also observed nationally.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brachytherapy; prostate cancer; registry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29271056     DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  5 in total

1.  External Validation of a Predictive Model of Urethral Strictures for Prostate Patients Treated With HDR Brachytherapy Boost.

Authors:  Vanessa Panettieri; Tiziana Rancati; Eva Onjukka; Martin A Ebert; David J Joseph; James W Denham; Allison Steigler; Jeremy L Millar
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 2.  Practical brachytherapy solutions to an age-old quandary.

Authors:  N Thiruthaneeswaran; H Tharmalingam; P J Hoskin
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26

3.  Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in melanoma clinical quality registries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zachary Blood; Anh Tran; Lauren Caleo; Robyn Saw; Mbathio Dieng; Mark Shackleton; H Peter Soyer; Chris Arnold; Graham J Mann; Rachael L Morton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Predicting toxicity caused by high-dose-rate brachytherapy single boost for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Johan Staby Olsén; Dalia Estefan; Antonios Valachis; Frida Jakobsson; Leif Karlsson; Bengt Johansson
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Real-world utilisation of brachytherapy boost and patient-reported functional outcomes in men who had external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer in Australia.

Authors:  Wee Loon Ong; Melanie Evans; Nathan Papa; Jeremy Millar
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-08-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.