Literature DB >> 29270755

Congenital vaginal atresia: A report of 39 cases in a regional Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital.

Meng Zhang1,2,3, Ming-Xing Zhang1,2,3, Gui-Ling Li4,5,6, Cong-Jian Xu7,8,9.   

Abstract

To investigate the clinical course and management of congenital vaginal atresia. This retro-spective analysis included patients with congenital vaginal atresia treated from March 2004 to August 2014 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. Thirty-nine patients were included in this study. Their average age was 16.87±2.2 years when they came to our hospital. Totally, 51% of the patients had isolated congenital vaginal atresia with a normal cervix, whereas the others had either cervical atresia or imperforate hymen. The primary presenting signs and symptoms included primary amenorrhea (71.8%), periodic abdominalgia (41.0%), abdominal pain (36.0%), dyspareunia (10.3%), menstrual disorders (5.1%), and pelvic mass (5.1%). Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were effective inspection methods for the screening of urogenital tract-associated anomalies. Vagi-noplasty mainly included simple vagina reconstruction with insertion of a mold (n=22) and split-thickness skin grafting (n=4). In 64% of surgical patients, normal menstrual bleeding was achieved. Four of the patients subsequently became pregnant and delivered at term. Primary amenorrhea, periodic abdominalgia and abdominal pain are the main reasons for the post pubertal patients to visit doctors. Surgical methods can successfully provide these patients an opportunity for subsequent conservative management, can result in normal menstrual bleeding, resolve cyclic pelvic pain, and provide some po-tential for fertility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital vaginal atresia; diagnosis; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29270755     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-017-1829-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  17 in total

1.  Pregnancies after reconstructive surgery for congenital cervicovaginal atresia.

Authors:  B Chakravarty; H Konar; N N Chowdhury
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Pitfalls in diagnosis and management of distal vaginal agenesis: 10-year experience at a single centre.

Authors:  M G Ugur; O Balat; E Ozturk; M Bekerecioglu; E Dikensoy
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system.

Authors:  Grigoris F Grimbizis; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Obstructive reproductive tract anomalies.

Authors:  Jennifer E Dietrich; Debra M Millar; Elisabeth H Quint
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 5.  Müllerian duct anomalies: embryological development, classification, and MRI assessment.

Authors:  Jessica B Robbins; Christy Broadwell; Lawrence C Chow; John P Parry; Elizabeth A Sadowski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Vaginal anomalies and atresia associated with imperforate anus: diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Kartikey A Pandya; Hiroyuki Koga; Manabu Okawada; Arnold G Coran; Atsuyuki Yamataka; Daniel H Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Management strategies for Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser related vaginal agenesis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan C Routh; Marc R Laufer; Glenn M Cannon; David A Diamond; Patricio C Gargollo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Congenital absence of the vagina. The Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome.

Authors:  J E Griffin; C Edwards; J D Madden; M J Harrod; J D Wilson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  An update on surgical and non-surgical treatments for vaginal hypoplasia.

Authors:  Nina Callens; Griet De Cuypere; Petra De Sutter; Stan Monstrey; Steven Weyers; Piet Hoebeke; Martine Cools
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 10.  Role of laparoscopy in vaginal malformation.

Authors:  O Philbois; E Guye; O Richard; D Tardieu; P Seffert; Y Chavrier; F Varlet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.