Friyan Turel1, Delena Caagbay2, Hans Peter Dietz3. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Neonatology, Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62 Derby Street, Kingswood, NSW, 2747, Australia. friyanturel@gmail.com. 2. The University of Sydney, Australia, Sydney, Australia. 3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Neonatology, Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, 62 Derby Street, Kingswood, NSW, 2747, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Limited existing evidence suggests that there is a high prevalence of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) amongst Nepali women. However, to date, no comprehensive assessment of pelvic floor functional anatomy has been undertaken in this population. Our study aimed to determine functional pelvic floor anatomy in Nepali women attending a general gynaecology clinic. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive women attending the clinic were offered an interview, clinical examination [International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (ICS/POP-Q)] and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS). Most presented with general gynaecological complaints. Five were excluded due to previous pelvic surgery, leaving 124. RESULTS: A POP-Q exam was possible in 123 women, of whom 29 (24%) were diagnosed with a significant cystocele, 50 (41%) significant uterine prolapse and seven (6%) significant posterior compartment prolapse. Evaluation of 4D TLUS data sets was possible in 120 women, of whom 25 (21%) had a significant cystocele, 45 (38%) significant uterine prolapse and ten (8%) significant descent of the rectal ampulla. In 13 cases, there was a rectocele with a mean depth of 14 (10-28) mm. Of 114 women in whom uterine position could be determined, 68 (60%) had a retroverted uterus associated with significant uterine prolapse (P 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: POP is common in Nepali women attending a general gynaecology clinic, with a high prevalence of uterine prolapse (40%). Uterine retroversion was seen in 60% and was associated with uterine prolapse. Patterns of POP in Nepal seem to be different from patterns observed in Western populations.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Limited existing evidence suggests that there is a high prevalence of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) amongst Nepali women. However, to date, no comprehensive assessment of pelvic floor functional anatomy has been undertaken in this population. Our study aimed to determine functional pelvic floor anatomy in Nepali women attending a general gynaecology clinic. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive women attending the clinic were offered an interview, clinical examination [International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (ICS/POP-Q)] and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS). Most presented with general gynaecological complaints. Five were excluded due to previous pelvic surgery, leaving 124. RESULTS: A POP-Q exam was possible in 123 women, of whom 29 (24%) were diagnosed with a significant cystocele, 50 (41%) significant uterine prolapse and seven (6%) significant posterior compartment prolapse. Evaluation of 4D TLUS data sets was possible in 120 women, of whom 25 (21%) had a significant cystocele, 45 (38%) significant uterine prolapse and ten (8%) significant descent of the rectal ampulla. In 13 cases, there was a rectocele with a mean depth of 14 (10-28) mm. Of 114 women in whom uterine position could be determined, 68 (60%) had a retroverted uterus associated with significant uterine prolapse (P 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: POP is common in Nepali women attending a general gynaecology clinic, with a high prevalence of uterine prolapse (40%). Uterine retroversion was seen in 60% and was associated with uterine prolapse. Patterns of POP in Nepal seem to be different from patterns observed in Western populations.
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Glenn McNally; Philippa Ramsay; Warwick Birrell; Vanessa Logan Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 2.100
Authors: Emily L Whitcomb; Guri Rortveit; Jeanette S Brown; Jennifer M Creasman; David H Thom; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Leslee L Subak Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 7.661