| Literature DB >> 29270454 |
Adimalla Narsimha1, Venkatayogi Sudarshan1.
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization recommendation, the optimal fluoride concentration levels in drinking water have to be in the range of 0.5 and 1.5 mg/L since this permissible range is essential for normal mineralization of bones and teeth as well as for dental enamel formation in human's body Bell and budwig, 1970;Adimalla and Venkatayogi, 2017;Narsimha and Sudarshan, 2013,2016;2017[1], [2], [4], [5], [6]. If continues intake of high fluoride (>1.5) water can severely cause dental and skeletal fluorosis. The investigated area people majorly depend on groundwater for drinking purposes and fluoride concentration ranged from 0.2 to 7.4 mg/L with mean concentration of 2.7 mg/L and data was compared with WHO guidelines for drinking purposes. Overall, data reveals that the 57% of groundwater samples data was not safe for drinking purposes. Therefore, distribution of fluoride in the groundwater of Medak region in Telangana was suggested to intake drinking water, which are below level of fluoride concentration in the groundwater and take care about health implications.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29270454 PMCID: PMC5735302 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Geology map of Medak region, Telangana State, South India.
Fig. 2Sampling locations with different fluoride concentrations on groundwater of Medak region.
Physical and chemical characteristics of groundwater samples and their comparison with WHO in different aquifers, Medak district, Telangana State, South India.
| pH | EC | TDS | TH | F- | Cl- | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Na+ | K+ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | 169 | 108 | 50 | 0.2 | 18 | 25 | 21 | 4 | 10 | 2.4 | 14 | 1 | |
| 234 | 150 | 100 | 0.4 | 31 | 36 | 23 | 4 | 20 | 10 | 18 | 1 | ||
| 384 | 246 | 115 | 0.4 | 92 | 36 | 70 | 6.6 | 14 | 55 | 44 | 1 | ||
| Maximum | 3170 | 2029 | 1550 | 7.4 | 527 | 959 | 328` | 440 | 164 | 380 | 145 | 24 | |
| 2350 | 1504 | 870 | 6.4 | 323 | 604 | 249 | 299 | 102 | 680 | 134 | 21 | ||
| 880 | 563 | 375 | 2.2 | 329 | 355 | 254 | 97 | 80 | 195 | 95 | 4 | ||
| Mean | 864.9 | 554 | 240.22 | 2.76 | 306.44 | 245 | 158.4 | 69 | 52 | 72.0 | 65.36 | 3.2 | |
| 794.2 | 508.3 | 240 | 1.51 | 200.5 | 213.13 | 155.12 | 80.45 | 45.67 | 122.35 | 51.25 | 2.83 | ||
| 583.23 | 373.27 | 212.50 | 1.36 | 218.38 | 146.26 | 168.15 | 33.92 | 35.27 | 124.50 | 67.30 | 1.40 | ||
| WHO highest limits | 6.5–9.2 | 1500 | 1500 | 500 | 1.5 | 600 | 600 | 600 | 45 | 200 | 150 | 200 | 12 |
| % of sample exceeding highest limit | 10 | 1 | 2 | 57 | Nil | 1 | Nil | 51 | Nil | 10 | Nil | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 17 | Nil | 1 | Nil | 58 | Nil | 21 | Nil | 4 | ||
| Nil | Nil | Nil | 50 | Nil | Nil | Nil | 1 | Nil | 30 | Nil | Nil |
Granitic.
Basaltic.
Laterite aquifers.
Fig. 3Relation between a) Fluoride and pH, b) F- and c) F- and d) F- and Ca2+ e) fluoride concentrations and different aquifers.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data accessibility |