Literature DB >> 29270053

Using family history forms in pediatric oncology to identify patients for genetic assessment.

A Hamilton1, E Smith2, J Hamon3, E Tomiak1,2, M Bassal1,3, S L Sawyer1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We set out to identify and offer genetic testing to the 5%-10% of pediatric cancer patients who have been estimated to carry germline mutations in inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. Clinical genetic testing has become widely available, and thus in busy oncology clinics, tools are needed to identify patients who could benefit from a referral to genetics.
METHODS: We studied the clinical utility of administering a family history form in the pediatric oncology long-term follow-up clinic to identify patients who might have an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome. Genetic testing involved primarily Sanger sequencing in clia (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments)-certified laboratories.
RESULTS: Of 57 patients who completed forms, 19 (33.3%) met criteria for referral to genetics. A significant family history of cancer was present for 4 patients, and 12 patients underwent genetic testing. Of 18 genetic tests ordered, none identified a pathogenic mutation, likely because of a small sample size and a candidate-gene approach to testing. Three families were also identified for further assessment based on a family history of breast cancer, with two of families having members eligible for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing in pediatric oncology patients is important to guide the management of patients who have an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome and to identify other family members at risk when mutations are identified. When no mutations are identified, that information is often reassuring to families who are worried about siblings. However, in the absence of an identified genetic cause in a patient, some uncertainty remains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer genetics; family histories; genomics; inherited cancer predisposition syndromes; pediatric genetic testing; pediatric oncology

Year:  2017        PMID: 29270053      PMCID: PMC5736483          DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  15 in total

1.  The McGill Interactive Pediatric OncoGenetic Guidelines: An approach to identifying pediatric oncology patients most likely to benefit from a genetic evaluation.

Authors:  Catherine Goudie; Hallie Coltin; Leora Witkowski; Stephanie Mourad; David Malkin; William D Foulkes
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Hereditary cancer risk assessment in a pediatric oncology follow-up clinic.

Authors:  Sara Knapke; Rajaram Nagarajan; Judy Correll; Debra Kent; Karen Burns
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Biallelic mutations in BRCA1 cause a new Fanconi anemia subtype.

Authors:  Sarah L Sawyer; Lei Tian; Marketta Kähkönen; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Martin Kircher; Jacek Majewski; David A Dyment; A Micheil Innes; Kym M Boycott; Lisa A Moreau; Jukka S Moilanen; Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  Mainstreaming genetic testing of cancer predisposition genes.

Authors:  Nazneen Rahman
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 5.  10 rare tumors that warrant a genetics referral.

Authors:  Kimberly C Banks; Jessica J Moline; Monica L Marvin; Anna C Newlin; Kristen J Vogel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  The effectiveness of family history questionnaires in cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Susan Randall Armel; Jeanna McCuaig; Amy Finch; Rochelle Demsky; Tony Panzarella; Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Genetic testing and tumor surveillance for children with cancer predisposition syndromes.

Authors:  Aarati Rao; Jennifer Rothman; Kim E Nichols
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 8.  Recognition of genetic predisposition in pediatric cancer patients: An easy-to-use selection tool.

Authors:  Marjolijn C J Jongmans; Jan L C M Loeffen; Esmé Waanders; Peter M Hoogerbrugge; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Roland P Kuiper; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Germline Mutations in Predisposition Genes in Pediatric Cancer.

Authors:  Jinghui Zhang; Michael F Walsh; Gang Wu; Kim E Nichols; Michael N Edmonson; Tanja A Gruber; John Easton; Dale Hedges; Xiaotu Ma; Xin Zhou; Donald A Yergeau; Mark R Wilkinson; Bhavin Vadodaria; Xiang Chen; Rose B McGee; Stacy Hines-Dowell; Regina Nuccio; Emily Quinn; Sheila A Shurtleff; Michael Rusch; Aman Patel; Jared B Becksfort; Shuoguo Wang; Meaghann S Weaver; Li Ding; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; Amar Gajjar; David W Ellison; Alberto S Pappo; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A novel Fanconi anaemia subtype associated with a dominant-negative mutation in RAD51.

Authors:  Najim Ameziane; Patrick May; Anneke Haitjema; Henri J van de Vrugt; Sari E van Rossum-Fikkert; Dejan Ristic; Gareth J Williams; Jesper Balk; Davy Rockx; Hong Li; Martin A Rooimans; Anneke B Oostra; Eunike Velleuer; Ralf Dietrich; Onno B Bleijerveld; A F Maarten Altelaar; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Hans Joenje; Gustavo Glusman; Jared Roach; Leroy Hood; David Galas; Claire Wyman; Rudi Balling; Johan den Dunnen; Johan P de Winter; Roland Kanaar; Richard Gelinas; Josephine C Dorsman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.