Literature DB >> 29269805

Reduction of DMSO concentration in cryopreservation mixture from 10% to 7.5% and 5% has no impact on engraftment after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: results of a prospective, randomized study.

Iwona Mitrus1, Andrzej Smagur2, Wojciech Fidyk2, Malwina Czech3, Magdalena Prokop3, Agata Chwieduk2, Magdalena Glowala-Kosinska2, Tomasz Czerw2, Malgorzata Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka2, Wlodzimierz Mendrek2, Katarzyna Michalak2, Maria Sadus-Wojciechowska2, Jacek Najda2, Jerzy Holowiecki2, Sebastian Giebel2.   

Abstract

The procedure of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (autoPBSCT) requires cryopreservation of cells in a mixture containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). DMSO is necessary to secure cell viability, however, its infusion may be toxic to stem cell recipient. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of DMSO concentration on engraftment after autoPBSCT.One-hundred-fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of three study arms; their leukapheresis products were cryopreserved in 10%, 7.5% or 5% DMSO. The study groups did not differ with regard to the diagnosis (mainly lymphomas and multiple myeloma), age, conditioning regimen, and the number of transplanted hematopoietic stem cells. 143 patients were treated with autoPBSCT. The frequency of adverse effects during and shortly after infusion was the lowest in 5% DMSO arm (p = 0.02 compared to 10% DMSO). 4 patients died due to infection before the engraftment. The median time to leukocyte and neutrophil recovery was 10 days in all study groups (p = 0.36 and p = 0.2). As well, the median day of platelet recovery was the same for all DMSO concentrations and equaled 15 days (p = 0.61).In view of these results, 5% DMSO mixture may be considered a new standard in cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29269805     DOI: 10.1038/s41409-017-0056-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of freshly cultured versus cryopreserved mesenchymal stem cells in animal models of inflammation: A pre-clinical systematic review.

Authors:  Chintan Dave; Shirley H J Mei; Andrea McRae; Christine Hum; Katrina J Sullivan; Josee Champagne; Tim Ramsay; Lauralyn McIntyre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Adverse reactions of dimethyl sulfoxide in humans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bennedikte Kollerup Madsen; Maria Hilscher; Dennis Zetner; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-11-05

3.  Cryopreserved Spontaneous Spheroids from Compact Bone-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Hongwei Dong; Xianqi Li; Kai Chen; Ni Li; Hideaki Kagami
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 4.  Cryopreservation as a Key Element in the Successful Delivery of Cell-Based Therapies-A Review.

Authors:  Julie Meneghel; Peter Kilbride; G John Morris
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-11-26

5.  Infecting human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Hector Huerga Encabo; Rachel Ulferts; Aneesh Sharma; Rupert Beale; Dominique Bonnet
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-10-06

6.  Towards Reduction or Substitution of Cytotoxic DMSO in Biobanking of Functional Bioengineered Megakaryocytes.

Authors:  Denys Pogozhykh; Dorothee Eicke; Oleksandr Gryshkov; Willem F Wolkers; Kai Schulze; Carlos A Guzmán; Rainer Blasczyk; Constança Figueiredo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.