Since its launch, the journal has maintained a constant interest for papers with strong methodological components. A few recent examples include the i3C method for analyzing chromatin conformation without chemical cross‐linking (Brant et al, 2016), a deep learning classifier for high‐content imaging data (Kraus et al, 2017), and an RNA‐seq‐based approach for synthetic circuit characterization and debugging (Gorochowski et al, 2017). After discussions with authors and readers and consultation with our Editorial Advisory Board, we concluded that a dedicated Methods section would provide a more visible home to studies with a primary focus on methodological developments in all flavors of systems and synthetic biology. In line with the scope of the journal, Method articles published in Molecular Systems Biology should report technologies that are likely to be broadly adopted by the scientific community and have a clear potential to reveal new biology. Even if new fundamental discoveries are not necessarily expected, new methods should be applied to a concrete biological question.Our new Methods section will present both experimental and computational methods that put forward novel concepts, open new areas of research, or allow the formulation of new biological questions. We will also publish original approaches that show significantly improved performance over existing methodologies or allow analyses at scales or at levels of accuracy that were not possible thus far. When possible, measures of performance, validation of predictions, and systematic benchmarking with independent datasets should be reported. To ensure reproducibility and wide dissemination, it is particularly important that Methods are rigorously documented. Ease of implementation, precise description of protocols, and availability of the relevant reagents, software components, and datasets are further important criteria since they all facilitate the broad adoption of a new method across different labs.We are proud to launch our Methods section with a string of papers reporting exciting new technologies (Lawson et al, 2017; Schmierer et al, 2017 and Weile et al, 2017). Weile et al (2017) systematically map functional missense variation in human genes to identify disease variants. They present an innovative approach based on a new deep mutational scanning strategy combined with machine learning that produces complete functional maps for full‐length proteins. The studies by Lawson et al (2017) and Schmierer et al describe methodologies for characterizing genotype–phenotype relationships. In the first study, Lawson et al (2017) combine single‐molecule live‐cell microscopy phenotyping with in situ genotyping by sequential fluorescent hybridization of barcoded plasmids. Their method enables for the first time the application of sensitive time‐lapse imaging to the analysis of large genetic libraries and thus allows mapping genetic diversity to dynamic molecular phenotypes. Schmierer et al, 2017, address the important issue of reproducibility and robustness in genome‐scale CRISPR‐based functional screens. They show that massively parallel lineage tracing through the inclusion of random sequence labels provides an elegant method to improve the accuracy, precision, and statistical power of large‐scale functional screens.We are confident that the addition of this new Methods section to the content of Molecular Systems Biology will appeal to a broad range of researchers, and we enthusiastically invite the community to submit high‐quality method papers reporting innovative methodological advances that will drive new discoveries and bring the field forward.
Authors: Thomas E Gorochowski; Amin Espah Borujeni; Yongjin Park; Alec Ak Nielsen; Jing Zhang; Bryan S Der; D Benjamin Gordon; Christopher A Voigt Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 11.429
Authors: Jochen Weile; Song Sun; Atina G Cote; Jennifer Knapp; Marta Verby; Joseph C Mellor; Yingzhou Wu; Carles Pons; Cassandra Wong; Natascha van Lieshout; Fan Yang; Murat Tasan; Guihong Tan; Shan Yang; Douglas M Fowler; Robert Nussbaum; Jesse D Bloom; Marc Vidal; David E Hill; Patrick Aloy; Frederick P Roth Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 11.429
Authors: Oren Z Kraus; Ben T Grys; Jimmy Ba; Yolanda Chong; Brendan J Frey; Charles Boone; Brenda J Andrews Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 11.429
Authors: Michael J Lawson; Daniel Camsund; Jimmy Larsson; Özden Baltekin; David Fange; Johan Elf Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 11.429
Authors: Bernhard Schmierer; Sandeep K Botla; Jilin Zhang; Mikko Turunen; Teemu Kivioja; Jussi Taipale Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 11.429