| Literature DB >> 29268812 |
K A M Gaythorpe1, C L Trotter1, B Lopman2, M Steele2, A J K Conlan1.
Abstract
Norovirus is one of the leading causes of viral gastroenteritis worldwide and responsible for substantial morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. To further understanding of the epidemiology and control of norovirus, there has been much recent interest in describing the transmission dynamics of norovirus through mathematical models. In this study, we review the current modelling approaches for norovirus transmission. We examine the data and methods used to estimate these models that vary structurally and parametrically between different epidemiological contexts. Many of the existing studies at population level have focused on the same case notification dataset, whereas models from outbreak settings are highly specific and difficult to generalise. In this review, we explore the consistency in the description of norovirus transmission dynamics and the robustness of parameter estimates between studies. In particular, we find that there is considerable variability in estimates of key parameters such as the basic reproduction number, which may mean that the effort required to control norovirus at the population level may currently be underestimated.Entities:
Keywords: Basic reproduction number; estimating disease prevalence; mathematical modelling; norovirus; transmission
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29268812 PMCID: PMC5851036 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268817002692
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Infect ISSN: 0950-2688 Impact factor: 4.434
Fig. 1.Diagram of citations between reviewed works divided by setting [10, 20, 21, 31, 35, 43, 46–48, 52–54, 59, 69]. Boxes show first authors of each study. Arrows denote that the study may have been influenced by earlier studies, established through citation, and arrow colour varies for ease of reading. Boxes with white backgrounds indicate a study has estimated and provided a novel value of a reproduction number. Superscript symbols denote co-authorship with * indicating co-authorship with Lopman; ° Simmons and ~ Zelner.
Summary of reviewed studies and their reproduction number estimates where appropriate [10, 20, 31, 35, 43, 46, 48, 52–54, 59, 69]
| Reference | Setting | Data | Model type(s) | Basic/effective | Definitions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence | Population | IID [ | Deterministic | Basic | ||
| O'Neill and Marks [ | School | Absence information and questionnaires | Discrete time Reed-Frost | |||
| Vanderpas | Long- term care facility | Incidence data from stool samples | Deterministic | Effective | ||
| Heijne | Scout jamboree | Case numbers and onset times | N/A | Effective | ||
| Sukhrie | Hospital and care homes | Surveys and incidence data from stool samples | Serial intervals and transmission trees | N/A | Effective | |
| Simmons | Population | IID2 [ | Deterministic | Basic | lead eigenvalue of matrix | |
| Lopman | Population | IID2 [ | Deterministic | |||
| Milbrath | Population | Published shedding durations from challenge studies and outbreak investigations | Deterministic and stochastic | Basic | ||
| Zelner | Households | Incidence data from phone surveys | Discrete stochastic | |||
| Lane [ | Population | IID2 [ | Deterministic | |||
| O'Dea | Multiple hospitals | Survey and simulated data | Stochastic | Basic | ||
| Bartsch | Multiple hospitals | Simulated data | Agent-based Reed-Frost | Estimates used from Simmons | ||
| Steele | Population | Hospitalisation counts | Deterministic | Basic | ||
| Matsuyama | Population | Outbreak case notifications | Deterministic | Effective | ||
Fig. 2.Reproduction number values for the subset of studies, shown in Fig. 1, where reproduction numbers are explicitly mentioned; the x-axis denotes first author [10, 21, 31, 35, 43, 47, 48, 52–54, 69]. Squares denote individual values of the basic reproduction number according to the definition given in the Aims section; circles denote individual values of the effective reproduction number according to the definition given in the Aims section. Filled shapes denote that the value was estimated, empty shapes denote that the value was assumed and lines denote 95% confidence interval ranges if provided. Where mutliple reproduction number values are estimated for different situations, detailed in text, all values are shown.