Literature DB >> 29268724

Surgical treatment of ankle fracture with or without deltoid ligament repair: a comparative study.

Hong-Mou Zhao1, Jun Lu1, Feng Zhang2, Xiao-Dong Wen1, Yi Li1, Ding-Jun Hao3, Xiao-Jun Liang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deltoid ligament (DL) rupture is commonly seen in clinical practice; however the need to explore and surgically repair it is still in debate. The objective of the current study is to compare the outcomes of surgical treatment of ankle fracture with or without DL repair.
METHODS: Between 2009 and 2015, Seventy-four ankle fractures with DL rupture were identified and followed. Twenty patients were treated with surgical repair of the DL, while 54 were not. The pre- and post-operative medial clear space (MCS) were measured and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used for functional evaluation. According to the radiological malreduction of MCS, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each potential relative factor were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean followup time was 53.7 months. The mean MCS preoperatively, postoperatively, and at last followup time were 8.7 ± 2.4 (range, 6.2-14.8) mm, 3.7 ± 0.9 (range, 2.6-6.4) mm, 3.6 ± 1.0 (range, 2.6-6.8) mm, respectively. The mean AOFAS score was 86.4 ± 8.1 (range, 52-100) points, and the mean VAS was 1.4 ± 1.4 (range, 0-7) points. During followup, 14.9% (11/74) cases were found to be malreduced (MCS>5 mm), and 5.4% (4/74) went on to failure. Surgical repair of DL can significantly decrease the postoperative MCS (P<0.05), and can also decrease the malreduction rate (P<0.05). AO/OTA type-C ankle fractures showed a positive correlation with malreduction (OR = 4.38, P = 0.03). In this type of injury, surgical repair of the DL can significantly decrease the malreduction rate (P<0.05). No significant difference was found between the AO/OTA type-B fracture with or without DL repair.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of the DL is helpful in decreasing the postoperative MCS and malreduction rate, especially for the AO/OTA type-C ankle fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle fracture; Deltoid ligament; Medial clear space; Syndesmosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29268724      PMCID: PMC5740931          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1907-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


Background

The deltoid ligament (DL) rupture is highly relevant in clinical practice where ankle injuries are commonly encountered [1-4]. An arthroscopic study reported a partial or total rupture of the deltoid ligament in 39.6% of ankle fracture patients [5]. Another magnetic resonance imaging investigation reported 58.3% of acute ankle fractures have been found with tears of the deltoid ligament [4]. However, in ankle fractures combined with DL rupture, the necessity of surgical repair of the deltoid ligament is always in debate. Early studies suggested that exploration of the medial side of the ankle and repair of the deltoid ligament were not necessary after anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation of the lateral malleolus [6-9]. A prospective randomized study reported no difference in early mobilization or in long term results between deltoid ligament repaired and unrepaired groups [9]. However, another study reported that unrepaired deltoid ligament may be a source of persistent pain or pronation deformity when not appropriately treated [10]. Johnson and Hill [11] reported 30 patients with combined fibular fracture and deltoid ligament rupture, where the fibula was fixed and the deltoid ligament was left unrepaired, and the results showed poor symptomatic and functional result in 41% of patients. Until now, the dilemma of whether the deltoid ligament should be surgically repaired in acute ankle fracture is still controversial. Thus, we retrospectively studied the ankle fracture patients with DL rupture in our center to evaluate the need for surgical repair of the deltoid ligament.

Methods

The current study was approved by the research board in our hospital. The authors retrospectively studied the clinical and radiological outcomes of operative treatment of ankle fractures with DL rupture between March 2009 and December 2015. The inclusion criteria contained: (1) adults greater than 18 years old; (2) with acute closed ankle fractures treated operatively; (3) with preoperative medial clear space (MCS) ≥ 6 mm in anterior-posterior ankle X-rays; (4) and at least 12 months followup. The exclusion criteria contained: (1) the time of injury to surgical intervention more than 14 days; (2) open ankle fractures; (3) DL rupture combined with medial malleolar fracture; (4) pathological fractures; (5) with preoperative dysfunction of the lower limb. A total of 2432 ankle fractures treated operatively were identified initially. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, seventy-four patients with 52 males and 22 females were included in current study (Fig. 1). The average age was 39.5 ± 15.5 (range, 18–76) years. Causes of fracture included 42 sprains, 13 falls from height, 12 traffic injuries and 7 sports injuries. According to the AO/OTA classification system [12], 49 type-B and 25 type-C were included; according to Lauge-Hansen classification system [13], there were 49 supination-external rotation (SER), 19 pronation-external rotation (PER) and 6 pronation-abduction (PA) injuries. The preoperative MCS was 8.7 ± 2.4 (range, 6.2–14.8) mm. Twenty patients were treated with surgical repair of DL, and 54 patients were not. The basic information in two groups was similar (Table 1).
Fig. 1

The flowchart of the patients’ selection

Table 1

Basic information and functional outcomes between deltoid ligament repaired and unrepaired patients

DL repaired (n = 20)DL unrepaired (n = 54) P-value
Gender (M/F)16/436/180.39
Side (L/R)12/830/240.80
Causes of injury
 Sprain10320.75
 Fall from high49
 Traffic injury39
 Sports injury34
AO (Lauge-Hansen) classification
 Type-B (SER)12370.49
 Type-C (PER/PA)817
Mean follow-up time46.9 ± 22.556.3 ± 23.90.13
MCS (mm)9.5 ± 1.88.4 ± 2.50.08
Post-operative MCS (mm)3.3 ± 0.33.8 ± 1.00.03
Follow-up MCS (mm)3.2 ± 0.33.8 ± 1.20.03
Syndesmosis fixation9210.63
Malreduction (%)0 (0)11 (20.4)0.03
Failure (%)0 (0)4 (7.4)0.57
AOFAS88.0 ± 5.885.9 ± 8.70.32
VAS1.2 ± 0.81.6 ± 1.60.29

M Male, F Female, L Left, R Right, SER Supination-external rotation, PER Pronation-external rotation, PA Pronation-abduction, MCS Medial clear space, AOFAS American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle and hindfoot score, VAS Visual analogue scale

The flowchart of the patients’ selection Basic information and functional outcomes between deltoid ligament repaired and unrepaired patients M Male, F Female, L Left, R Right, SER Supination-external rotation, PER Pronation-external rotation, PA Pronation-abduction, MCS Medial clear space, AOFAS American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle and hindfoot score, VAS Visual analogue scale All patients were treated with a similar surgical protocol. For the AO/OTA type-B fracture, the fibular length and rotation was restored, and fixed with a small-fragment plate and screws. The posterior malleolar fracture was reduced and fixed for fragments larger than 10% of the articular surface based on the lateral X-ray. If the syndesmotic complex was disrupted, as indicated by its widening during operation, one or two screws were placed across it. For the AO/OTA type-C fracture, the fibula fracture was openly reduced and fixed if it involved the distal two-thirds fragment, but most of the proximal one third fibula fractures were left without fixation after the length and rotation were restored and syndesmotic screws were placed. The posterior malleolar fracture was treated similar to the AO/OTA type-B fracture. For the patients who underwent repair of the DL, reinsertion to the medial malleolus or talus was achieved by suturing directly to the bone, and enhanced with a suture anchor (Fig. 2). The superficial component ruptures were sutured with absorbable suture.
Fig. 2

a The preoperative X-ray showed enlargement of the medial clear space. b MRI revealed the totally rupture of the deep layer of deltoid ligament (arrow). c The postoperative X-ray showed good reduction of the medial clear space. d Intraoperative photo showed rupture of the deltoid ligament (arrow). e A suture anchor was placed in the talus insertion of the deep layer of deltoid ligament (arrow). (f and g) The deep (arrow) and superficial layers were sutured

a The preoperative X-ray showed enlargement of the medial clear space. b MRI revealed the totally rupture of the deep layer of deltoid ligament (arrow). c The postoperative X-ray showed good reduction of the medial clear space. d Intraoperative photo showed rupture of the deltoid ligament (arrow). e A suture anchor was placed in the talus insertion of the deep layer of deltoid ligament (arrow). (f and g) The deep (arrow) and superficial layers were sutured Postoperatively, all patients were immobilized in a short leg cast. At 6 weeks, the cast was taken off, followed by aggressive range of motion and strengthening exercises. The syndesmosis screw was removed in 8 to 12 weeks before full weight-bearing.

Clinical and radiographic examination

The preoperative, postoperative and final followup anterior-posterior ankle joint X-rays were analyzed. The MCS was measured with Harper’s method [7]. The MCS ≥ 5 mm at any postoperative followup time was defined as malreduction. Treatment failure was defined as symptomatic malreduction and need for any revision surgery. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for functional evaluation at the final followup time [11]. For the failure cases, the AOFAS and VAS scores before revision were included as the final outcomes.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis of the included data was performed using Student t test or Pearson chi-square test with the level of significance set at α = 0.05. According to the malreduction rate, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for the potential relative factor. The statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).

Results

The mean followup time was 53.7 ± 23.8 (range, 14–97) months. The mean AOFAS at followup time was 86.4 ± 8.1 (range, 52–100) points; and the mean VAS was 1.4 ± 1.4 (range, 0–7) points. The mean postoperative MCS was 3.7 ± 0.9 (range, 2.6–6.4) mm, which was significantly decreased from the preoperative value (P<0.01), and maintained at the last followup time (3.6 ± 1.0 (range, 2.6–6.8) mm). No malreduction or failures occurred in the DL repair group, however, the malreduction rate was 20.4% in unrepair group (P = 0.03). The failure rate was 7.4% in the unrepair group, but no significant difference was detected with the numbers available. According to the current study, the mean postoperative MCS was significantly smaller in the DL repair group (P = 0.03), and also smaller at the followup time (P = 0.03, Table 1). This may be because of the higher malreduced rate in the unrepair group. If the malreducted patients were excluded, the mean MCS decreased to 3.3 ± 0.4 mm postoperatively and 3.2 ± 0.4 mm at final followup time; and the difference disappeared when compared with repair group. No significant difference was detected for AOFAS and VAS scores with the numbers available. The characteristics of the malreduced patients were summarized in Table 2. Four patients were considered failures and were revised 4–16 months after the initial operation. The other 7 patients all reached good functional outcomes, and painless walking although with increased MCS. The mean AOFAS score of the other 7 patients was 86.6 ± 3.3 (range, 85–95) points, and with a mean VAS score of 1.6 ± 1.1 (range, 0–3) points with a mean follow-up time of 62.6 months. According to our current results, OTA type-C injury was positively correlated with malreduction (Table 3). No correlation was found between malreduction and treatment methods. When compared to the functional outcomes with respect to the OTA classification, the malreduction rate in unrepaired Type-C patients was significantly higher than in unrepaired Type-B patients and repaired Type-C patients (Table 4).
Table 2

Characters of malreducted and failure patients

CasesGenderAge (y)Causes of injuryClassificationFibular fixationPM fixationSS fixationDL repairFU (m)AOFASVASReversion time (m)Reversion procedures
AOLH
1Male25SprainType-CPER-3YesNoNoNo56853
2Male42SprainType-CPER-3NoNoYesNo36882
3Male22FallType-BSER-4YesNoYesNo96882
4Male39SprainType-BSER-4YesNoNoNo58911
5Male28SportType-CPER-4YesYesNoNo86950
6Male18SportType-BSER-4YesNoNoNo5953a 7a 11Fibular lengthen, medial debridement and repair
7Male47TrafficType-CPA-3YesNoYesNo6763a 6a 7Fibular lengthen, SS fixation, medial debridement and repair
8Male52TrafficType-BSER-4YesYesNoNo94881
9Male27SportType-CPER-3YesNoYesNo7664a 6a 16Fibular lengthen, SS fixation, medial debridement and repair
10Male21FallType-CPER-4YesNoYesNo47911
11Female49FallType-CPA-3YesNoNoNo4163a 6a 4SS fixation, medial debridement and repair

aThe functional score before reversion surgery

y Year, m Months, AO AO classification, LH Lauge-Hansen classification, PM Posterior malleolus, SS Syndesmosis screw, DL Deltoid ligament, FU Follow-up time, PER Pronation-external rotation, SER Supination-external rotation, PA Pronation-adduction, AOFAS American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle and hindfoot score, VAS Visual analogue scale

Table 3

The correlation of relative factors and malreduction

Relative factorsOR95% CI P-value
Female gender0.200.02–1.670.14
Left side0.590.16–2.120.42
Classification
 Type-C4.381.14–16.790.03
Treatment
 Fibular fixation0.500.05–5.300.56
 PM fixation0.320.06–1.590.16
 SS fixation0.870.23–3.280.84
 DL repair0.090.01–1.640.10

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, PM Posterior malleolus, SS Syndesmosis screw, DL Deltoid ligament

Table 4

Outcomes of patients with and without deltoid ligament repair according to different AO classification

DL repaired (n = 20)DL unrepaired (n = 54)
Type-B (n = 12)Type-C (n = 8)Type-B (n = 37)Type-C (n = 17)
MCS (mm)9.7 ± 1.69.4 ± 1.88.4 ± 2.68.4 ± 2.5
Post-operative MCS (mm)3.3 ± 0.33.3 ± 0.33.6 ± 1.04.1 ± 1.1
Follow-up MCS (mm)3.2 ± 0.33.2 ± 0.43.5 ± 1.04.1 ± 1.2
Malreduction (%)0 (0)0 (0)# 4 (10.8)* 7 (41.2)*#
Failure (%)0 (0)0 (0)1 (2.7)3 (17.6)
AOFAS86.8 ± 4.889.8 ± 7.486.3 ± 7.584.9 ± 11.1
VAS1.3 ± 0.61.0 ± 1.11.4 ± 1.32.1 ± 2.2

MCS Medial clear space, AOFAS American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle and hindfoot score, VAS Visual analogue scale

* P<0.05. # P<0.05

Characters of malreducted and failure patients aThe functional score before reversion surgery y Year, m Months, AO AO classification, LH Lauge-Hansen classification, PM Posterior malleolus, SS Syndesmosis screw, DL Deltoid ligament, FU Follow-up time, PER Pronation-external rotation, SER Supination-external rotation, PA Pronation-adduction, AOFAS American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle and hindfoot score, VAS Visual analogue scale The correlation of relative factors and malreduction OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, PM Posterior malleolus, SS Syndesmosis screw, DL Deltoid ligament Outcomes of patients with and without deltoid ligament repair according to different AO classification MCS Medial clear space, AOFAS American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle and hindfoot score, VAS Visual analogue scale * P<0.05. # P<0.05

Discussion

DL is a complex ligament structure spanning from the medial malleolus to the navicular, talus, and calcaneus bones, and it plays a role in limiting the anterior and posterior translation of the talus and restrains talar abduction. DL repair is performed more frequently than expected, particularly in Weber type B fractures [5]. Surgical treatment of intraarticular fractures is well-accepted as malreduction of the articular surface may cause post-traumatic osteoarthritis rapidly. However, the need for surgical repair of the ruptured DL after the anatomic reduction of the bony structures is still under debate. Early studies showed that reconstruction of a ruptured DL was not necessary. Harper [7] reported 36 patients, all without repair of DL, and the results show no morbidity or evidence of ligamentous instability. Stromsoe et al. [9] reported a prospective randomized study including 50 patients, where the results showed no difference was found between groups. Baird et al. [6] reported 24 ankle fracture patients with DL rupture, with 21 patients without repair of the DL reaching a good to excellent rate of 90%; however, of the 3 patients with DL repair, 2 had poor results. So, the author concluded that exploration of the medial side of the ankle and repair of the DL are not necessary unless reduction of the lateral malleolus fails to reduce the talus within the ankle mortise. However, Zeegers and van der Werken [8] reported 28 patients without repair of the DL, and 8 (28.6%) had poor results. Johnson and Hill [11] reported 30 patients with combined fibula fracture and DL rupture, where the fibula was fixed and DL was left unrepaired, and the results showed poor symptomatic and functional result in 41% of patients. Tejwani et al. [14] reported that the functional outcome for those with a bimalleolar fracture is worse than that for those with a lateral malleolar fracture and disruption of the DL. In our current study, the functional outcomes between the DL repaired and unrepaired patients reached no significant difference with the numbers available. However, the malreduction rate was significantly higher in DL unrepaired group (0% versus 20.4%). And, in the malreducted patients, 36% (4/11) failed and required revision; although the other 64% (7/11) with increased posterior MCS reached good functional outcomes with a mean 5 years followup. For the Weber type-B (SER-4) ankle fracture with DL rupture combined with syndesmosis instability, the use of a syndesmosis screw for temporary fixation was showed to increase the functional outcomes while without DL repair [15]. In our current study, we included 49 Weber type-B patients with DL rupture, and 17 with syndesmosis fixation, and 1 (5.9%) with malreduction of medial malleolar space but with good functional outcomes and without pain. According to our current results, the functional outcomes and radiological outcomes for the Weber type-B patients with DL rupture reached no significant difference with or without DL repair (Table 4). The Weber type-C fractures showed a positive correlation with malreduction in our current study (OR = 5.53, Table 3). However, if the DL was repaired, the malreduction rate decreased significantly even in Weber type-C fracture patients (P = 0.04). Lee et al. [16] reported that in the case of high-grade unstable fractures of the lateral malleolus, repair of the anterior DL was adequate for restoring medial stability. We do agree with Hintermann et al. [10] that careful reconstruction of the medial ligaments of the ankle is needed if restoration of full mechanical stability is not proven after internal fixation of Weber type-C ankle fracture. Many authors agreed that after anatomical reconstruction of the lateral malleolus with congruity of the ankle mortise there is no need to explore and repair the ruptured DL [7, 8, 17]. According to our current results, for the Weber type-B ankle fractures, DL repair may be not a necessary procedure after anatomic reduction of the bony structures (Fig. 3, Table 4); however, not for the type-C fractures (Fig. 4, Table 4).
Fig. 3

a The preoperative X-ray showed an AO/OTA type-B ankle fracture. b The patient was treated with open reduction and internal fixation of lateral and posterior malleolus, and the medial clear space was back to normal without surgical repair of the deltoid ligament. c Two years followup show good reduction of the medial clear space

Fig. 4

a An AO/OTA type-C ankle fracture with enlarged medial clear space and syndesmotic space. b The patient was fixed with a syndesmotic screw, and the medial clear space was reduced to normal. c One year postoperative X-ray showed malreduction of the medial clear space although without symptoms

a The preoperative X-ray showed an AO/OTA type-B ankle fracture. b The patient was treated with open reduction and internal fixation of lateral and posterior malleolus, and the medial clear space was back to normal without surgical repair of the deltoid ligament. c Two years followup show good reduction of the medial clear space a An AO/OTA type-C ankle fracture with enlarged medial clear space and syndesmotic space. b The patient was fixed with a syndesmotic screw, and the medial clear space was reduced to normal. c One year postoperative X-ray showed malreduction of the medial clear space although without symptoms Limitations of our current study included that we used MCS ≥ 6 mm in anterior-posterior ankle X-ray without stress or gravity-stress, which may have a lower sensitivity, although most authors used MCS ≥ 5 mm on the initial unstressed anterior-posterior X-ray to define the DL rupture [7, 18, 19]. Park et al. [19] showed that measurement of an MCS ≥ 5 mm on stress radiographs taken in dorsiflexion-external rotation yielded a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 61–100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 89–100%) in cadaveric study. Schuberth et al. [20] reported at an MCS ≥ 5 mm, the false-positive rate for deltoid rupture diminished to 26.9%; and with an MCS ≥ 6 mm, the false-positive rate for deltoid rupture was only 7.7%. As expected, larger MCS thresholds usually resulted in higher specificity but lower sensitivity [21]. Our current method ensured a high specificity for diagnosis. The low sensitivity also explained why we have a smaller percentage of medial ligament injury (6.9%) compared with the previous reports (10–22.6%) [8, 14]. For the postoperative evaluation, we used MCS ≥ 5 mm to define the malreduction just in order to increase the sensitivity. The other limitation was our retrospective design, and not a randomized assignment of the groups. However, the baselines of the two groups were similar, and our results showed very useful information for clinical practice which have not been reported before.

Conclusions

According to the current study, we concluded that the surgical repair of the DL is helpful in decreasing the postoperative MCS and malreduction rate; especially for the Weber type C ankle fractures. However, the relationship between increased MCS and failure is still unclear. A lot of the patients with increased MCS in the current study still with satisfactory outcomes during long term followup. According to the results, well designed prospective comparative studies focus on the necessary for surgical repair of DL are still needed.
  21 in total

1.  The repair of a ruptured deltoid ligament is not necessary in ankle fractures.

Authors:  K Strömsöe; H E Höqevold; S Skjeldal; A Alho
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-11

2.  Syndesmotic disruption in low fibular fractures associated with deltoid ligament injury.

Authors:  Nabil A Ebraheim; Hossein Elgafy; Thomas Padanilam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Competence of the deltoid ligament in bimalleolar ankle fractures after medial malleolar fixation.

Authors:  P Tornetta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle.

Authors:  B Hintermann; P Regazzoni; C Lampert; G Stutz; A Gächter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-04

5.  Rupture of the deltoid ligament in ankle fractures: should it be repaired?

Authors:  A V Zeegers; C van der Werken
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 6.  The Morphology and Prevalence of the Deltoid Complex Ligament of the Ankle.

Authors:  Kaissar Yammine
Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec       Date:  2016-11-02

Review 7.  Evaluation of the integrity of the deltoid ligament in supination external rotation ankle fractures: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michel P J van den Bekerom; Eduard L A R Mutsaerts; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  The contribution of anterior deltoid ligament to ankle stability in isolated lateral malleolar fractures.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Lee; Kyu Sun Jang; Gi Won Choi; Chan Dong Jeong; Suk Joo Hong; Min A Yoon; Hak Jun Kim
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Authors:  J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Deltoid ligament in acute ankle injury: MR imaging analysis.

Authors:  Min Sun Jeong; Yun Sun Choi; Yun Jung Kim; Jin Su Kim; Ki Won Young; Yoon Young Jung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  [Unstable injuries of the deltoid ligament complex in ankle fractures : How to diagnose, how to treat?]

Authors:  Carsten Schlickewei; Nicola Krähenbühl; Graham John Dekeyser; Megan Mills; Matthias Priemel; Stefan Rammelt; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Deltoid ligament repair reduces and stabilizes the talus in unstable ankle fractures.

Authors:  Bennet A Butler; Eric C Hempen; Mauricio Barbosa; Muturi Muriuki; Robert M Havey; Richard W Nicolay; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-06-04

Review 3.  Outcome of primary deltoid ligament repair in acute ankle fractures: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Motasem Salameh; Abduljabbar Alhammoud; Nedal Alkhatib; Ahmed K Attia; Mohamed M Mekhaimar; Pieter D'Hooghe; Karim Mahmoud
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Therapeutic approach to combined deltoid ligament disruption with lateral malleolus fracture: Current evidence and literature review.

Authors:  Khalil Nasrallah; Shtarker Haim; Bathish Einal
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-03-31

5.  Acute foot and ankle injuries and time return to sport.

Authors:  Gowreeson Thevendran; Anish R Kadakia; Eric Giza; Daniel Haverkamp; Jonkheer Pieter D'Hooghe; Andrea Veljkovic; Nasef Mohamed Nasef Abdelatif
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  Management of deltoid ligament injuries in acute ankle fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael James; Andrew Dodd
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Comparison of deltoid ligament repair and non-repair in acute ankle fracture: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Wenxuan Guo; Wujie Lin; Wenhuan Chen; Yu Pan; Rujie Zhuang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Assessing the Utility of Deltoid Ligament Repair in Ankle Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kiya Shazadeh Safavi; Aryan Rezvani; Cory F Janney; Jie Chen; Waleed Cassis; Navid Darayan; Vinod K Panchbhavi; Daniel C Jupiter
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-19

9.  Transarticular external fixation versus deltoid ligament repair in treating SER IV ankle fractures: a comparative study.

Authors:  Bohua Li; Shanxi Wang; Zhengdong Zhang; Hai Yang; Jun Li; Qin Li; Lei Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Reduction and fixation of anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament avulsion fracture without syndesmotic screw fixation in rotational ankle fracture.

Authors:  Kee Jeong Bae; Seung-Baik Kang; Jihyeung Kim; Jaewoo Lee; Tae Won Go
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 1.671

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.