Literature DB >> 2926846

Cervical spine immobilization of penetrating neck wounds in a hostile environment.

G I Arishita1, J S Vayer, R F Bellamy.   

Abstract

Current guidelines concerning trauma suggest that cervical spine immobilization be performed on all patients with penetrating wounds of the neck. This study was undertaken to examine the risks and benefits likely to be found when such care is provided in a hazardous environment, such as the battlefield, or the scene of a terrorist attack or domestic criminal action. Data for casualties from the Vietnam conflict were reviewed to determine the potential benefit of cervical spine immobilization on the battlefield. In this population, penetrating cervical cord injury was always fatal and usually immediately so. Only 1.4% of all casualties who were candidates for immobilization might have benefitted from the care. However, the risk of performing immobilization in a hazardous environment is substantial since about 10% of casualties are incurred while helping other casualties. Mandatory immobilization of all casualties with penetrating neck wounds sustained in an environment hazardous to first aid providers has an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2926846     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198903000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  2 in total

Review 1.  Tactical combat casualty care in the Canadian Forces: lessons learned from the Afghan war.

Authors:  Erin Savage; Colleen Forestier; Nicholas Withers; Homer Tien; Dylan Pannell
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Chinese expert consensus on the treatment of modern combat-related spinal injuries.

Authors:  Zhao-Wen Zong; Hao Qin; Si-Xu Chen; Jia-Zhi Yang; Lei Yang; Lin Zhang; Wen-Qiong Du; Xin Zhong; Ren-Jie Zhou; Dan Tan; Hao Wu
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2019-02-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.