Literature DB >> 29267954

High diagnostic accuracy of histone H4-IgG autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Stefan Vordenbäumen1, Paloma Böhmer1, Ralph Brinks1, Rebecca Fischer-Betz1, Jutta Richter1, Ellen Bleck1, Petra Rengers2, Heike Göhler2, Hans-Dieter Zucht2, Petra Budde2, Peter Schulz-Knappe2, Matthias Schneider1.   

Abstract

Objective: Diagnosis of SLE relies on the detection of autoantibodies. We aimed to assess the diagnostic potential of histone H4 and H2A variant antibodies in SLE.
Methods: IgG-autoantibodies to histones H4 (HIST1H4A), H2A type 2-A (HIST2H2AA3) and H2A type 2-C (HIST2H2AC) were measured along with a standard antibody (SA) set including SSA, SSB, Sm, U1-RNP and RPLP2 in a multiplex magnetic microsphere-based assay in 153 SLE patients [85% female, 41 (13.5) years] and 81 healthy controls [77% female, 43.3 (12.4) years]. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess diagnostic performance of individual markers. Logistic regression analysis was performed on a random split of samples to determine the additional value of histone antibodies in comparison with SA by likelihood ratio test and determination of diagnostic accuracy in the remaining validation samples.
Results: Microsphere-based assay showed good interclass correlation (mean 0.85, range 0.73-0.99) and diagnostic performance in receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve (AUC) range 84.8-93.2) compared with routine assay for SA parameters. HIST1H4A-IgG was the marker with the best individual diagnostic performance for SLE vs healthy (AUC 0.97, sensitivity 95% at 90% specificity). HIST1H4A-IgG was an independent significant predictor for the diagnosis of SLE in multivariate modelling (P < 0.0001), and significantly improved prediction of SLE over SA parameters alone (residual deviance 45.9 vs 97.1, P = 4.3 × 10-11). Diagnostic accuracy in the training and validation samples was 89 and 86% for SA, and 95 and 89% with the addition of HIST1H4A-IgG.
Conclusion: HIST1H4A-IgG antibodies improve diagnostic accuracy for SLE vs healthy.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. [br]For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29267954     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  4 in total

1.  Characterisation of a human antibody that potentially links cytomegalovirus infection with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Jie Ying Jacklyn Neo; Seng Yin Kelly Wee; Isabelle Bonne; Sen Hee Tay; Manfred Raida; Vojislav Jovanovic; Anna-Marie Fairhurst; Jinhua Lu; Brendon J Hanson; Paul A MacAry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Emerging Molecular Markers Towards Potential Diagnostic Panels for Lupus.

Authors:  Gongjun Tan; Binila Baby; Yuqiu Zhou; Tianfu Wu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  A proteomic repertoire of autoantigens identified from the classic autoantibody clinical test substrate HEp-2 cells.

Authors:  Julia Y Wang; Wei Zhang; Jung-Hyun Rho; Michael W Roehrl; Michael H Roehrl
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.988

4.  A Master Autoantigen-ome Links Alternative Splicing, Female Predilection, and COVID-19 to Autoimmune Diseases.

Authors:  Julia Y Wang; Michael W Roehrl; Victor B Roehrl; Michael H Roehrl
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2021-08-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.