Literature DB >> 29267947

ART, Stoffenmanager, and TRA: A Systematic Comparison of Exposure Estimates Using the TREXMO Translation System.

Nenad Savic1, Bojan Gasic2, David Vernez1.   

Abstract

Several occupational exposure models are recommended under the EU's REACH legislation. Due to limited availability of high-quality exposure data, their validation is an ongoing process. It was shown, however, that different models may calculate significantly different estimates and thus lead to potentially dangerous conclusions about chemical risk. In this paper, the between-model translation rules defined in TREXMO were used to generate 319000 different in silico exposure situations in ART, Stoffenmanager, and ECETOC TRA v3. The three models' estimates were computed and the correlation and consistency between them were investigated. The best correlated pair was Stoffenmanager-ART (R, 0.52-0.90), whereas the ART-TRA and Stoffenmanager-TRA correlations were either lower (R, 0.36-0.69) or no correlation was found. Consistency varied significantly according to different exposure types (e.g. vapour versus dust) or settings (near-field versus far-field and indoors versus outdoors). The percentages of generated situations for which estimates differed by more than a factor of 100 ranged from 14 to 97%, 37 to 99%, and 1 to 68% for Stoffenmanager-ART, TRA-ART, and TRA-Stoffenmanager, respectively. Overall, the models were more consistent for vapours than for dusts and solids, near-fields than for far-fields, and indoor than for outdoor exposure. Multiple linear regression analyses evidenced the relationship between the models' parameters and the relative differences between the models' predictions. The relative difference can be used to estimate the consistency between the models. Furthermore, the study showed that the tiered approach is not generally applicable to all exposure situations. These findings emphasize the need for a multiple-model approach to assessing critical exposure scenarios under REACH. Moreover, in combination with occupational exposure measurements, they might also be used for future studies to improve prediction accuracy.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECETOC TRA; Stoffenmanager; TREXMO; advanced REACH tool; consistency; occupational exposure models

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29267947     DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxx079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health        ISSN: 2398-7308            Impact factor:   2.179


  4 in total

Review 1.  Validity of Tier 1 Modelling Tools and Impacts on Exposure Assessments within REACH Registrations-ETEAM Project, Validation Studies and Consequences.

Authors:  Urs Schlueter; Martin Tischer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Evaluating the Theoretical Background of STOFFENMANAGER® and the Advanced REACH Tool.

Authors:  Antti Joonas Koivisto; Michael Jayjock; Kaarle J Hämeri; Markku Kulmala; Patrick Van Sprang; Mingzhou Yu; Brandon E Boor; Tareq Hussein; Ismo K Koponen; Jakob Löndahl; Lidia Morawska; John C Little; Susan Arnold
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.779

Review 3.  Extension of the Advanced REACH Tool (ART) to Include Welding Fume Exposure.

Authors:  Aduldatch Sailabaht; Fan Wang; John Cherrie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models' Reliability.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Francesca Borghi; Davide Campagnolo; Sabrina Rovelli; Marta Keller; Giacomo Fanti; Andrea Cattaneo; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.