Literature DB >> 2926692

Physiology of lateral line mechanoreceptive regions in the elasmobranch brain.

H Bleckmann1, O Weiss, T H Bullock.   

Abstract

The physiology of mechanoreceptive lateral line areas was investigated in the thornback guitarfish, Platyrhinoidis triseriata, from medulla to telecephalon, using averaged evoked potentials (AEPs) and unit responses as windows to brain functions. Responses were analysed with respect to frequency sensitivity, intensity functions, influence of stimulus repetition rate, response latency, receptive field (RF) organization and multimodal interaction. 1. Following a quasi-natural vibrating sphere stimulus, neural responses were recorded in the medullary medial octavolateralis nucleus (MON), the dorsal (DMN) and anterior (AN) nucleus of the mesencephalic nuclear complex, the diencephalic lateral tuberal nucleus (LTN), and a telencephalic area which may correspond to the medial pallium (Figs. 2, 3, 13, 14, 15, 16). 2. Within the test range of 6.5-200 Hz all lateral line areas investigated responded to minute water vibrations. Best frequencies (in terms of displacement) were between 75 and 200 Hz with threshold values for AEPs as low as 0.005 microns peak-to-peak (p-p) water displacement calculated at the skin surface (Fig. 6). 3. AEP-responses to a vibrating sphere stimulus recorded in the MON are tonic or phasic-tonic, i.e., responses are strongest at stimulus onset but last for the whole stimulus duration in form of a frequency following response (Fig. 3). DMN and AN responses are phasic or phasic-tonic. Units recorded in the MON are phase coupled to the stimulus, those recorded in the DMN, AN or LTN are usually not (Figs. 5, 8, 9). Diencephalic LTN and telencephalic lateral line responses (AEPs) often are purely phasic. However, in the diencephalic LTN tonic and/or off-responses can be recorded (Fig. 11). 4. For the frequencies 25, 50, and 100 Hz, the dynamic intensity range of lateral line areas varies from 12.8 to at least 91.6 dB (AEP) respectively 8.9 and 92 dB (few unit and single unit recordings) (Fig. 7). 5. Mesencephalic, diencephalic, and telecephalic RFs, based on the evaluation of AEPs or multiunit activity (MUA), are usually contralateral (AN and LTN) or ipsi- and contralateral (telencephalon) and often complex (Figs. 10, 12, 16). 6. In many cases no obvious interactions between different modalities (vibrating sphere, electric field stimulus, and/or a light flash) were seen. However, some recording sites in the mesencephalic AN and the diencephalic LTN showed bimodal interactions in that an electric field stimulus decreased or increased the amplitude of a lateral line response and vice versa (Fig. 13 B).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2926692     DOI: 10.1007/BF00610440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  26 in total

1.  Functional organization of the electroreceptive midbrain in an elasmobranch (Platyrhinoidis triseriata). A single-unit study.

Authors:  J Schweitzer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Unit activity of ganglionic and medullary second order neurones in the eel lateral line system.

Authors:  E Alnaes
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1973-06

3.  Representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of the cat.

Authors:  M M Merzenich; M D Reid
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-09-13       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Acousticolateral processing in the torus semicircularis of the trout Salmo gairdneri.

Authors:  L J Nederstigt; N A Schellart
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Functional organization of some auditory nuclei in the guinea fowl demonstrated by the 2-deoxyglucose technique.

Authors:  H Scheich; B A Bonke; D Bonke; G Langner
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Distinct auditory and lateral line nuclei in the midbrain catfishes.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1977-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Functional organization in electroreceptive midbrain of the catfish.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  An electrosensory area in the telencephalon of the little skate, Raja erinacea.

Authors:  D Bodznick; R G Northcutt
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-04-23       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Tonotopic organization in the midbrain of a teleost fish.

Authors:  S M Echteler
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  ELECTRICAL RESPONSES FROM THE LATERAL-LINE NERVES OF FISHES : V. RESPONSES IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM.

Authors:  H Hoagland
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1934-09-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral and central processing of lateral line information.

Authors:  H Bleckmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The time course and frequency content of hydrodynamic events caused by moving fish, frogs, and crustaceans.

Authors:  H Bleckmann; T Breithaupt; R Blickhan; J Tautz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Adaptive responses of peripheral lateral line nerve fibres to sinusoidal wave stimuli.

Authors:  Joachim Mogdans; Christina Müller; Maren Frings; Ferdinand Raap
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Central representation of spatial and temporal surface wave parameters in the African clawed frog.

Authors:  Francisco Branoner; Zhivko Zhivkov; Ulrike Ziehm; Oliver Behrend
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Two-dimensional receptive fields of midbrain lateral line units in the goldfish, Carassius auratus.

Authors:  Kai Voges; Horst Bleckmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Responses of brainstem lateral line units to different stimulus source locations and vibration directions.

Authors:  Silke Künzel; Horst Bleckmann; Joachim Mogdans
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Responses of medullary lateral line units of the rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and the nase, Chondrostoma nasus, to vortex streets.

Authors:  Jan Winkelnkemper; Simon Kranz; Horst Bleckmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Hydrodynamic perception in true seals (Phocidae) and eared seals (Otariidae).

Authors:  Wolf Hanke; Sven Wieskotten; Christopher Marshall; Guido Dehnhardt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 1.836

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.