Literature DB >> 29266516

How to kill a tree: empirical mortality models for 18 species and their performance in a dynamic forest model.

Lisa Hülsmann1,2,3, Harald Bugmann2, Maxime Cailleret2,4, Peter Brang1.   

Abstract

Dynamic Vegetation Models (DVMs) are designed to be suitable for simulating forest succession and species range dynamics under current and future conditions based on mathematical representations of the three key processes regeneration, growth, and mortality. However, mortality formulations in DVMs are typically coarse and often lack an empirical basis, which increases the uncertainty of projections of future forest dynamics and hinders their use for developing adaptation strategies to climate change. Thus, sound tree mortality models are highly needed. We developed parsimonious, species-specific mortality models for 18 European tree species using >90,000 records from inventories in Swiss and German strict forest reserves along a considerable environmental gradient. We comprehensively evaluated model performance and incorporated the new mortality functions in the dynamic forest model ForClim. Tree mortality was successfully predicted by tree size and growth. Only a few species required additional covariates in their final model to consider aspects of stand structure or climate. The relationships between mortality and its predictors reflect the indirect influences of resource availability and tree vitality, which are further shaped by species-specific attributes such as maximum longevity and shade tolerance. Considering that the behavior of the models was biologically meaningful, and that their performance was reasonably high and not impacted by changes in the sampling design, we suggest that the mortality algorithms developed here are suitable for implementation and evaluation in DVMs. In the DVM ForClim, the new mortality functions resulted in simulations of stand basal area and species composition that were generally close to historical observations. However, ForClim performance was poorer than when using the original, coarse mortality formulation. The difficulties of simulating stand structure and species composition, which were most evident for Fagus sylvatica L. and in long-term simulations, resulted from feedbacks between simulated growth and mortality as well as from extrapolation to very small and very large trees. Growth and mortality processes and their species-specific differences should thus be revisited jointly, with a particular focus on small and very large trees in relation to their shade tolerance.
© 2017 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  European tree species; dynamic vegetation models; empirical mortality models; forest inventory data; forest reserves; generalized logistic regression; individual tree mortality; tree growth

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29266516     DOI: 10.1002/eap.1668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  4 in total

1.  Canopy mortality has doubled in Europe's temperate forests over the last three decades.

Authors:  Cornelius Senf; Dirk Pflugmacher; Yang Zhiqiang; Julius Sebald; Jan Knorn; Mathias Neumann; Patrick Hostert; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Early-Warning Signals of Individual Tree Mortality Based on Annual Radial Growth.

Authors:  Maxime Cailleret; Vasilis Dakos; Steven Jansen; Elisabeth M R Robert; Tuomas Aakala; Mariano M Amoroso; Joe A Antos; Christof Bigler; Harald Bugmann; Marco Caccianaga; Jesus-Julio Camarero; Paolo Cherubini; Marie R Coyea; Katarina Čufar; Adrian J Das; Hendrik Davi; Guillermo Gea-Izquierdo; Sten Gillner; Laurel J Haavik; Henrik Hartmann; Ana-Maria Hereş; Kevin R Hultine; Pavel Janda; Jeffrey M Kane; Viachelsav I Kharuk; Thomas Kitzberger; Tamir Klein; Tom Levanic; Juan-Carlos Linares; Fabio Lombardi; Harri Mäkinen; Ilona Mészáros; Juha M Metsaranta; Walter Oberhuber; Andreas Papadopoulos; Any Mary Petritan; Brigitte Rohner; Gabriel Sangüesa-Barreda; Jeremy M Smith; Amanda B Stan; Dejan B Stojanovic; Maria-Laura Suarez; Miroslav Svoboda; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Ricardo Villalba; Alana R Westwood; Peter H Wyckoff; Jordi Martínez-Vilalta
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Tree mortality submodels drive simulated long-term forest dynamics: assessing 15 models from the stand to global scale.

Authors:  Harald Bugmann; Rupert Seidl; Florian Hartig; Friedrich Bohn; Josef Brůna; Maxime Cailleret; Louis François; Jens Heinke; Alexandra-Jane Henrot; Thomas Hickler; Lisa Hülsmann; Andreas Huth; Ingrid Jacquemin; Chris Kollas; Petra Lasch-Born; Manfred J Lexer; Ján Merganič; Katarína Merganičová; Tobias Mette; Brian R Miranda; Daniel Nadal-Sala; Werner Rammer; Anja Rammig; Björn Reineking; Edna Roedig; Santi Sabaté; Jörg Steinkamp; Felicitas Suckow; Giorgio Vacchiano; Jan Wild; Chonggang Xu; Christopher P O Reyer
Journal:  Ecosphere       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.593

4.  An evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling.

Authors:  Timothy Thrippleton; Lisa Hülsmann; Maxime Cailleret; Harald Bugmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.