Literature DB >> 29265594

Short- and long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy using biological mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective cohort study of 224 consecutive patients.

R McLean1, M Kipling2, E Musgrave3, M Mercer-Jones1.   

Abstract

AIM: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is potentially a safe and effective operation to correct pelvic organ prolapse and to treat obstructive defaecation and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. This study aimed to evaluate, in a prospective, consecutive cohort of patients, the long-term clinical outcomes following LVMR, patient-reported functional and quality of life outcomes, and urinary and sexual dysfunction.
METHOD: Data on 224 patients who underwent LVMR with Permacol™ biological mesh were collected prospectively from May 2008 to October 2016. Outcome measures were complications, recurrence, mortality, patient satisfaction, patient-reported functional and quality of life outcomes, and urinary and sexual dysfunction. Scores were compared using the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: There was no mortalities associated with LVMR in this series; complications occurred in 10.7% of patients (4.9% early, 5.8% late). Mesh-related morbidity was 0.45% and vaginal suture-related morbidity was 1.33%. Recurrence occurred in 25 patients (11.4%), 5% at 12 months, 10.7% at 5 years. Significant improvement in patient-reported functional outcomes were seen (P < 0.001) for both constipation and faecal incontinence symptoms. Furthermore, significant improvement in quality of life outcomes for patients with constipation, faecal incontinence and prolapse persisted through follow-up (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was positive for > 90% of patients during follow-up. Symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, urge incontinence and dyspareunia improved significantly postoperatively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: LVMR using Permacol is associated with low morbidity and mortality, recurrence and, additionally, significantly improved constipation, faecal incontinence and prolapse functional and quality of life outcomes, with associated improvement in urogynaecological symptoms. Colorectal Disease
© 2017 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy; Permacol mesh; outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29265594     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ventral Prosthesis Rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Manatakis; Nikolaos Gouvas; George Pechlivanides; Evangelos Xynos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-19

2.  A systematic literature review on solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: is there a therapeutic consensus in 2018?

Authors:  Claire Gouriou; Marion Chambaz; Alain Ropert; Guillaume Bouguen; Véronique Desfourneaux; Laurent Siproudhis; Charlène Brochard
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A prospective pilot study on MRI visibility of iron oxide-impregnated polyvinylidene fluoride mesh after ventral rectopexy.

Authors:  K E Laitakari; J K Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; E Pääkkö; P Ohtonen; T T Rautio
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Altemeier perineal rectosigmoidectomy with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for a female adolescent with complete rectal prolapse: A case report.

Authors:  Tetsu Yamamoto; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Kiyoe Takai; Takahito Taniura; Yuki Uchida; Kazunari Ishitobi; Noriyuki Hirahara; Yoshitsugu Tajima
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Mesh safety in pelvic surgery: Our experience and outcome of biological mesh used in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Authors:  Anastasia Tsiaousidou; Linda MacDonald; Kawan Shalli
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 6.  Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E M van der Schans; M A Boom; M El Moumni; P M Verheijen; I A M J Broeders; E C J Consten
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Functional Outcome after Laparoscopic Posterior Sutured Rectopexy Versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: Six-year Follow-up of a Double-blind, Randomized Single-center Study.

Authors:  Jin Hidaka; Hossam Elfeki; Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen; Søren Laurberg; Lilli Lundby
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-08-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.