| Literature DB >> 29264571 |
Melissa J Schoelwer1, Vidhya Viswanathan2, Amy Wilson3, Corina Nailescu3, Erik A Imel1,4.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Hypercalcemia is reported as a rare finding in adrenal insufficiency, but is not well described in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).Entities:
Keywords: adrenal insufficiency; congenital adrenal hyperplasia; hypercalcemia; hypercalciuria; nephrocalcinosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29264571 PMCID: PMC5686705 DOI: 10.1210/js.2017-00145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Endocr Soc ISSN: 2472-1972
Figure 1.Flow diagram of patient selection. ICD9, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; NCCAH, nonclassic congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
Patient Characteristics
| No. (% of total) | 40 (100) | 33 (84) | 6 (15) | 3 (8) |
| Male sex, % | 50 | 52 | 50 | 100 |
| Salt-wasting CAH subtype, % | 90 | 91 | 83 | 100 |
Twelve of the total of 40 patients had at least one renal ultrasound assessment.
Figure 2.Comparison of 304 simultaneous measurements of 17OHP (log-scale) and serum calcium concentrations. Multiple data points are plotted for each patient (range, 0 to 25 per patient). Normal calcium range is highlighted in the gray box. There was a positive correlation (r = 0.170; P = 0.003), which remained significant after adjusting for age (r = 0.132; P = 0.024). To convert calcium mg/dL to mmol/L, multiply by 0.25. To convert 17OHP ng/dL to nmol/L, multiply by 0.0303.
Patients With Hypercalciuria and/or Nephrocalcinosis
| Sex | F | M | M | M | M | F | F |
| Highest Ca level, mg/dL | 11.0 | 14.2 | 10.9 | 11.3 | 12.5 | 11.5 | 11.6 |
| Mean Ca level, mg/dL | 10.2 | 12.2 | 10.3 | 10.1 | 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.3 |
| Total no. of Ca measurements | 26 | 15 | 26 | 48 | 22 | 15 | 14 |
| Ca range (min–max) | 9.5–11 | 10.6–14.2 | 9.2–10.9 | 9.5–11.3 | 9.5–12.5 | 9.7–11.5 | 9.8–11.6 |
| Age at first elevated Ca measurement, d | 15 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 16 | 16 |
| Age at last elevated Ca measurement, mo | 22 | Unresolved at 5 | 0.3 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 21 |
| Hypercalciuria | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Laboratory testing performed | |||||||
| Ca, mg/dL | 10 | 13.9 | — | — | 11.2 | 10.6 | 10.4 |
| Phos, mg/dL | 5.2 | 4.4 | — | — | 9 | — | — |
| PTH, pg/mL | 25 | <1 | — | — | — | 31 | 46 |
| 25D, ng/mL | 29 | 43.9 | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1,25D, pg/mL | 69 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Ur Ca/Cr | 0.8 at 9 mo | 2 at 5 mo | 0.55 at 11 mo | 0.83 at 2 mo | 0.56 at 5 mo | 0.73 at 2 y | 0.81 at 2 y |
| Nephrocalcinosis | No | Yes | No imaging | Yes | Yes | No imaging | No imaging |
| HTN | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Abbreviations: —, no data; 1,25D, calcitriol; 25D: calcidiol; Ca, calcium; HTN, hypertension; max, maximum; min, minimum; Phos, phosphorus; PTH, parathyroid hormone; Ur Ca/Cr, urine calcium to creatinine ratio.
Patients are twin sisters.
Conversion factors for SI units: Ca, multiply by 0.25 to get mmol/L; Phos, multiply by 0.323 to get mmol/L; PTH, multiply by 1 to get ng/L; 25D, multiply by 2.496 to get nmol/L; 1,25D, multiply by 2.6 to get pmol/L.
Serum samples drawn simultaneously, not at the time of hypercalcemia, for patients 1 and 7.
Patient was treated for presumed hypercalciuria based on nephrocalcinosis and Ur Ca/Cr ratio >75th percentile for age before treatment.