Literature DB >> 29264169

Risk factors for fever and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Aso Omer Rashid1,2, Saman Salih Fakhulddin1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is commonly used in the management of large renal stones. Postoperative infections are one of the most common complications of this procedure. The present study is to determine and assess the factors that may increase the risk to develop fever and urinary sepsis after PCNL.
METHODS: A total of 60 patients (38 males and 22 females) with a mean age of 40.25 years enrolled in this study in Sulaimania Teaching Hospital. Patients had renal stone disease need operation with different socioeconomic status, body mass index and different type and size of stones were included in this study. Patients with preoperative positive urine culture and sensitivity were excluded. Preoperative investigations done for all patients. All Patients received prophylactic antibiotic gentamicin intravenously at the induction of anaesthesia. Renal pelvis urine sample were taken from all patients after puncturing the pelvicalyceal system and send for culture and sensitivity. Patients were monitored closely in the postoperative period for the development of fever and sepsis.
RESULTS: Mean duration of the operations was 77.08 min ranged 40-120 min. All patients had postoperative nephrostomy tube. Seventeen (28.33%) patients developed post PCNL fever and the statistically significant factors for post PCNL fever were diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.001), stone burden (p = 0.001), number of the stones (p < 0.001), degree of hydronephrosis (p = 0.001), duration of the operation (p < 0.001), residual stones (p = 0.001) and number of tracts (p = 0.038). Three (5.00%) patients developed post PCNL sepsis, and the statistically significant risk factors for post PCNL sepsis were duration of the operation (p = 0.013) and intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drop in haemoglobin (HB) level (p = 0.046).
CONCLUSION: DM, staghorn stones, degree of hydronephrosis, duration of the operation and number of tracts are risk factors for post PCNL fever, while number of stones, intraoperative blood loss, duration of the operation and residual stones are risk factors for post PCNL sepsis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fever; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Renal stones; Sepsis; Urinary tract infection

Year:  2016        PMID: 29264169      PMCID: PMC5730806          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Urol        ISSN: 2214-3882


Introduction

Stone disease is common and affects 0.131% of the population at any time [1]. Numerous factors influence choice of treatment, such as stone characteristic, availability of equipment, complications and additional procedures required together with patient preference [2]. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective, safe and preferred treatment option for complex or large volume nephrolithiasis [3], [4]. However, PCNL carries a considerable risk, fever occur in 21%–39.8% of the patients [5]. Fever following PCNL may be secondary to urinary tract infection (UTI) which is significant clinically regarding the development of post-PCNL sepsis [6]. Determining which patients are at greatest risk is extremely important [7], [8]. However, fever may also originate from the release of the inflammatory mediators during surgical manipulation, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [8], [9]. Several studies showed post-PCNL urosepsis occurs in 0.3%–9.3% of patients, it is potentially life threatening condition and the most common cause of death [6], [8], [10]. Factors found to increase the risk of urosepsis are female sex, diabetes mellitus (DM), body mass index (BMI), and pelvicalyceal system dilatation [9], [11]. Several intraoperative factors are average renal pressure sustained during PCNL, operative time, number of tracts and degree of blood loss [6], [8]. Urosepsis that occur as a result of manipulation during PCNL can be catastrophic despite negative preoperative bladder urine culture and prophylactic antibiotic [9], [12]. Positive renal pelvis urine culture is regarded as a significant risk factor for post PCNL fever [12], [13]. Positive stone and pelvic urine culture is better predictors of the potential post-PCNL sepsis than bladder urine culture. One of the most important aspects of study in the management of complications of PCNL is the use of prophylactic antibiotic for prevention of sepsis [14], [15]. The use of short course of preoperative antibiotic has been found to significantly decrease the rate of post-PCNL fever and sepsis. American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotic preoperatively for a duration of less than 24 h [8]. The Clavien grading system is an excellent classification system that provides an objective grading system for complications of PCNL. The simplicity and ease of use of the Clavien classification system to 8 grade postoperative complications has resulted in its widespread adoption in surgery [16], [17], [18].

Patients and methods

Clinical data's collection

We performed a prospective clinical study in 60 patients, 38 males (63.3%) and 22 females (36.7%), who underwent PCNL in the Sulaimaniyah Teaching Hospital between June 2013 and June 2014. The study was approved by the Iraqi Board of Urology and Local Ethical Committee of the hospital. Patients with different age, gender, socioeconomic status, weight, different type and size of stones were included in this study. Preoperative fever, positive urine culture and nephrostomy tube were excluded from the study.

Patient preparation and operation

Patients were evaluated by history, physical examination, and investigations. All patients had mid-urine exam and culture. Haematological and biochemical determination, bleeding profiles, viral screen, blood group and cross match with compatible blood preparation were performed in all the patients. All patients had ultrasound examinations of the kidney and bladder and imaging study like KUB and excretory urography. In some patients with unclear anatomy of urinary tract, computed tomography (CT) with contrast enhancement was performed. Preoperative information including age, sex, BMI, DM, degree of hydronephrosis, number and size of the stones were recorded. All patients received a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics at the induction of anaesthesia. After patient intubation and induction of anaesthesia, the ipsilateral ureter was catheterized, then the patient turned prone. The costo-vertebral area prepared for needle puncture. Once percutaneous access achieved into the pelvicalyceal of the kidney, urine from the pelvicalyceal system was aspirate and sent to the laboratory as a pelvic urine for culture. Any growth of more than 100,000 bacteria was regarded as a positive urine culture (infected urine). The tract then dilated using concentric metal dilators (20–30 Fr) according to the stone burden and a suitable Amplatz sheath size was placed in the tract to continue the procedure using pneumatic lithotripsy under low pressure irrigation.

Post-operative management

All patients were left with a nephrostomy tube for at least 48 h with or without double J (JJ) stent insertion. Postoperatively the number of tracts, operative time and results of pelvic urine culture were collected. Postoperative International Sepsis Definitions Conference of 2001 was used to identify patients with SIRS. According to it if there is development of two or more of four criteria, namely fever less than 36 °C or greater than 38 °C, heart rate greater than 100 beats/min, respiratory rate greater than 20 breaths/min or PaCO2 lower than 32 mmHg, and white blood cell (WBC) count greater than 12 × 109/L or less than 4 × 109/L, the patient is documented to have fever and sepsis when there is SIRS with documented infection. Any development of fever were followed. Development of persistent rising fever, rigor, tachycardia, tachypnoea and changing level of consciousness, the patient was regarded as entering a state of sepsis, and was kept in intensive care unit until all signs and symptoms of sepsis returned to normal.

Data entry and analysis

The data were entered into a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet after data cleaning and then were transported into SPSS (IBM, IL, USA) for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, numbers and percentage) were calculated for variables. Probability measure were used, the analytical statistics was done to find the relations between variables with p value < 0.05 considered as significant.

Results

General patient informations

Sixty patients (38 males and 22 females) were included in this study, their mean age was 40.25 years. The mean number of stones was 2.32, and the mean size of stones was 30.8 mm (Table 1). The history and physical examinations of patients were shown in Table 2.
Table 1

General information, haematological and biochemical determination of patients before operation (n = 60).

VariableMin–maxMean ± SD
Age (year)3.5–76.040.25 ± 15.43
No. of stones1–62.32 ± 1.37
Size of stones (mm)11–70.030.8 ± 13.6
WBC (×109/L)7.2−137.670 ± 2.097
HB (g/dL)10.4–17.413.99 ± 1.61
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)1.33–8.563.26 ± 1.53
Serum creatinine (μmol/L)26.52–212.1685.13 ± 33.59

WBC, white blood cell count; HB, haemoglobin.

Table 2

Patients information during history and physical examinations (n = 60).

Parametern (%)
DM
 Positive8 (13.3)
 Negative52 (86.7)
Hypertension
 Positive11 (18.3)
 Negative49 (81.7)
PCNL
 Positive2 (3.3)
 Negative58 (96.7)
URS
 Positive11 (18.3)
 Negative49 (81.7)
History of open renal surgery
 Positive17 (28.3)
 Negative43 (71.7)
History of ESWL
 Positive24 (40.0)
 Negative36 (60.0)

DM, diabetes mellitus; PCNL, percutaneous nephrolithotomy; URS, ureterorenoscopy; ESWL, extra-corporeal lithotripsy.

General information, haematological and biochemical determination of patients before operation (n = 60). WBC, white blood cell count; HB, haemoglobin. Patients information during history and physical examinations (n = 60). DM, diabetes mellitus; PCNL, percutaneous nephrolithotomy; URS, ureterorenoscopy; ESWL, extra-corporeal lithotripsy.

Intraoperative data

Number of tracts created were: 45 (75.0%) one tract, 14 (23.3%) two tracts and one (1.7%) had three tracts. Location of stones: 17 are pelvic (28.3%), 24 (40.0%) are calyceal and combined pelvic and calyceal stones in 19 patients (31.7%). Thirteen patients (21.7%) had severe hydronephrosis, 36 patients (60.0%) had moderate hydronephrosis and 11 patients (18.3%) had mild hydronephrosis. Nine patients (15.0%) had staghorn calculi, 9 (15.0%) had partial staghorn calculi and 42 (70.0%) had non staghorn calculi.

Operative care findings

JJ stent was inserted in 51 patients (85.0%), and nephrostomy tube was inserted in all patients (100%). Blood transfusion was given to five (8.3%) patients, and pelvic urine positive was found in five (8.3%) patients. Residual stone was seen in 19 (31.7%) patients.

Postoperative data

Duration of operation was (77.08 ± 21.53) min (mean ± SD), WBC was (10.946 ± 2.892) × 109/L, haemoglobin was (12.45 ± 1.48) g/dL, blood urea nitrogen was (3.213 ± 1.702) mmol/L (Table 3).
Table 3

Shows mean and standard deviations of duration of the operation and postoperative investigations.

VariableMinMaxMean ± SD
Duration of operation (min)4012077.08 ± 21.53
WBC (×109/L)62510.946 ± 2.892
HB (g/dL)9.916.512.45 ± 1.48
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)1.42811.4243.213 ± 1.702
Serum creatinine (μmol/L)17.680265.2000100.776 ± 45.084

WBC, white blood cell; HB, haemoglobin.

Shows mean and standard deviations of duration of the operation and postoperative investigations. WBC, white blood cell; HB, haemoglobin.

Fever occurrence

Fever >38°C postoperatively developed with p value statistically significant in 17 (28.3%) patients totally; five (62.5%) diabetic patients, seven (77.8%) staghorn stone, four (44.4%) partial staghorn stone, 10 (27.8%) moderate hydronephrosis, six (54.5%) mild hydronephrosis, and 10 patients with residual stones see (Table 4).
Table 4

Incidences of sepsis and fever.

VariableTotal (n)Fever
p-ValueSepsis
p-Value
Present, n (%)Not present, n (%)Present, n (%)Not present, n (%)
Sex
 Male3811 (28.9)27 (71.1)0.8902 (5.3)36 (94.7)0.902
 Female226 (27.3)16 (72.6)1 (4.5)21 (95.5)
BMI group
 Under weight70 (0.0)7 (100.0)0 (0.0)7 (100.0)
 Normal62 (33.3)4 (66.7)0 (0.0)6 (100.0)
 Over weight257 (28.0)18 (72.0)0.4463 (12.0)22 (88.0)0.243
 Obese228 (36.4)14 (63.6)0 (0.0)22 (100.0)
Diabetes mellitus
 Positive85 (62.5)3 (37.5)0.0011 (12.5)7 (87.5)0.296
 Negative5212 (23.1)40 (76.9)2 (3.8)50 (96.2)
Stone burden
 Staghorn97 (77.8)2 (22.2)1 (11.1)8 (88.9)
 Partial staghorn94 (44.4)5 (55.6)0.0011 (11.1)8 (88.9)0.364
 Not staghorn426 (14.3)36 (85.7)1 (2.4)41 (97.6)
Degree of hydronephrosis
 Severe131 (7.7)12 (92.3)0.001(0.0)13 (100.0)0.349
 Moderate3610 (27.8)26 (72.2)3 (8.3)33 (91.7)
 Mild116 (54.5)5 (45.5)0 (0.0)11 (100.0)
JJ stent
 Inserted5117 (33.3)34 (66.7)0.0413 (5.9)48 (94.1)0.243
 Not inserted90 (0.0)9 (100.0)0 (0.0)9 (100.0)
Pelvis urine C/S
 Positive53 (60.0)2 (40.0)0.1010 (0.0)5 (100.0)0.591
 Negative5514 (25.5)41 (74.5)3 (5.5)52 (94.5)
Residual stones1952.63%47.36%15.7%84.21%
 <5 mm92 (22.2)7 (77.8)0.0011 (11.1)8 (88.9)0.001
 5–10 mm54 (80.0)1 (20.1)0 (0.0)5 (100.0)
 >10 mm54 (80.0)1 (20.1)2 (40.0)3 (60.0)
No residual stones417 (17.07)34 (82.92)0 (100)41 (100)
Total601743357

BMI, body mass index; JJ, double J ureteric catheter; C/S, culture and sensitivity test; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Incidences of sepsis and fever. BMI, body mass index; JJ, double J ureteric catheter; C/S, culture and sensitivity test; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Sepsis occurrence

Sepsis developed in three patients (5.0%) with p = 0.902, statistically not significant. Sepsis with a p value statistically significant occurs in three (12.0%) over weight patients, one diabetic patient (12.5%); one patient (11.1%) out of nine with staghorn stone burden, one patient (11.1%) out of nine with partial staghorn stone and one patient (2.4%) out of 42 with non staghorn stone (Table 4). Fever with p value of <0.001 is statistically significant found in patients with rising WBC and rising serum creatinine, number of stones and duration of the operation. Sepsis with p value statistically significant found in patients with prolonged duration of the operation, rising WBC and decreased haemoglobin (Table 5).
Table 5

Patient conditions in relation with fever and sepsis.

Patients conditionFever presentn = 17, mean ± SDFever not presentn = 43, mean ± SDp-ValueSepsis presentn = 3, mean ± SDSepsis not presentn = 57, mean ± SDp-Value
Age (year)43.0 ± 12.439.1 ± 16.50.31452.6 ± 13.439.60 ± 15.40.155
No. of stones3.47 ± 1.371.86 ± 1.08<0.0014.33 ± 1.522.21 ± 1.290.008
Size of stones (mm)42.2 ± 13.126.3 ± 11.1<0.00140.0 ± 10.030.3 ± 13.70.238
No. of tracts1.47 ± 0.511.19 ± 0.450.0381.33 ± 0.571.26 ± 0.480.808
Duration of the operation (min)97.65 ± 14.3768.9 ± 18.2<0.001106.67 ± 11.5475.5 ± 20.80.013
WBC(×109/L)13.370 ± 3.4699.674 ± 2.205<0.00117.500 ± 6.50010.601 ± 2.209<0.001
HB (g/dL)11.85 ± 1.1812.69 ± 1.530.04810.80 ± 0.7212.54 ± 1.460.046
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)0.11 ± 0.333.07 ± 10.080.3233.63 ± 4.503.19 ± 9.740.670
Serum creatinine (μmol/L)129.95 ± 0.7289.28 ± 0.330.001144.09 ± 0.4198.12 ± 0.510.091

WBC, white blood cell; HB, haemoglobin.

Patient conditions in relation with fever and sepsis. WBC, white blood cell; HB, haemoglobin.

Discussion

There are several studies reported on post PCNL fever, all with different results ranged incidence between 10%–32%, in our study 17 patients (28.3%) developed post PCNL fever (axillary temperature above 38°C). A number of factors may explain the wide variation in the incidence of post PCNL fever among studies. Female sex is a risk factor for the development of post PCNL fever [15] others not [4], in this study female sex was not a risk factor p = 0.890. It was reported in one study that BMI >18.5 kg/m2 was regarded as risk factor for post PCNL fever [6]. In the current study eight of the 17 patients with postoperative fever were obese. No fever was found in underweight patients. The p value for post PCNL fever and BMI was 0.446, showing no statistically significant, this is comparative to a Korean study [5]. DM is regarded as a risk factor for fever post PCNL [8], [5], [16], and in the current study DM is a risk factor for fever; among eight diabetic patients five (62.5%) developed fever with a (p = 0.001). The impact of stone burden as a risk factor for post PCNL fever is clear and confirmed by several studies [8], [5], [19] and in this study stone burden was a major risk factor facilitating the development of post PCNL fever. Hydronephrosis is regarded as a risk factor for post PCNL fever [8], [12], [19]. In the current study the degree of hydronephrosis was also a risk factor for post PCNL fever development (p = 0.001). Postoperative JJ stent insertion can increase the risk of post PCNL fever development [8], [15], and it is the same in the current study (p = 0.041). Positive renal pelvis urine culture is regarded as a significant risk factor for post PCNL fever [9], [12], [13]. In the current study positive renal pelvis urine culture was not a significant risk factor for post PCNL fever. Residual stones of different size is regarded as a risk factor [4], [8], [19], while others denied it [9]. In the current study presence of residual stones was a significant risk factor for post PCNL fever. Number of tracts created, number and size of stones were highly significant risk factors for post PCNL fever development, and this finding is comparative to findings in several studies [5], [7], [8]. Duration of the operation is a risk factor for post PCNL fever [5], [8], [19]. In the current study the operative time was highly significant (p <0.001). Rising WBC counts and postoperative serum creatinine had a significant correlation with post PCNL. A drop in the postoperative HB (p = 0.048). Sepsis after PCNL is uncommon but potentially life threatening [9], [13]. The incidence of postoperative sepsis differs between studies, some reported incidence of 2.4%, others reported incidence of 0.3%–4.7% [7] and 1.4% [17]. In the current study the incidence of post PCNL sepsis was 5.0%, this is comparative with the study done in Massachusetts by Kreydin and Eisner [8] with reported incidence of ∼4.7%. Number of stones was a risk factor for post PCNL sepsis (p = 0.008). Duration of the operation was a risk factor for post PCNL sepsis (p = 0.013). The rising of postoperative WBC counts in patients with continuous fever in the second and third postoperative days related significantly with post PCNL sepsis. A drop of HB postoperative was a risk factor for post PCNL sepsis (p = 0.046). Positive renal pelvis urine culture is regarded as a significant risk factor for post PCNL sepsis by several studies [12]. In the current study positive renal pelvis urine was not a risk factor for post PCNL sepsis.

Conclusion

Predictors of post PCNL fever include: DM, stone burden and number, hydronephrosis, number of tracts, duration of the operation, intraoperative bleeding, presence of residual stones and presence of postoperative JJ stent. Development of post PCNL fever significantly correlated with postoperative rising in WBC and serum creatinine and dropping in the HB levels. Predictors of post PCNL sepsis include: number of stones, duration of the operation, bleeding and presence of residual stones. Development of post PCNL sepsis significantly correlates with postoperative rising in WBC and dropping in the HB levels.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  16 in total

1.  Re: Urinary tract infections and post-operative fever in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Dean Assimos
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery.

Authors:  Evgeniy I Kreydin; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Predictors of immediate postoperative outcome of single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Khaled Shahrour; Jeffrey Tomaszewski; Tara Ortiz; Emily Scott; Kevan M Sternberg; Stephen V Jackman; Timothy D Averch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United kingdom: results of a prospective data registry.

Authors:  James N Armitage; Stuart O Irving; Neil A Burgess
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  One week of ciprofloxacin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduces upper tract infection and urosepsis: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Paramananthan Mariappan; Gordon Smith; Sami A Moussa; David A Tolley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Paramananthan Mariappan; Gordon Smith; Simon V Bariol; Sami A Moussa; David A Tolley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Role of preoperative and intraoperative factors in mediating infection complication following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  B Lojanapiwat; P Kitirattrakarn
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Prospective comparative study of two protocols of antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Emre Tuzel; Orhan Cem Aktepe; Bulent Akdogan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Complications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Classified by the Modified Clavien Grading System: A Single Center's Experience over 16 Years.

Authors:  Tae Seung Shin; Hyuk Jin Cho; Sung-Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sae Woong Kim; Tae-Kon Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17

10.  Prospective evaluation of complications using the modified Clavien grading system, and of success rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Guy's Stone Score: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Swarnendu Mandal; Apul Goel; Rohit Kathpalia; Satyanarayan Sankhwar; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Bhupender P Singh; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-10
View more
  11 in total

1.  Predictive accuracy of the modified SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for uroseptic shock after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Meng Gao; Zewu Zhu; Minghui Liu; Jinbo Chen; Hequn Chen
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.861

2.  A preoperative nomogram for sepsis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy treating solitary, unilateral and proximal ureteral stones.

Authors:  Yang Xun; Yuanyuan Yang; Xiao Yu; Cong Li; Junlin Lu; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  A randomized study comparing conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus check pyeloscopic percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Rohit Purwar; Vasudevan Thirugnanasambandam; Abdulrazack Mossadeq
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2021-07-14

4.  The characteristics and influencing factors of fever in postoperative patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ying Yu; Jieyu Pu; Tingting Wu; Li Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  The impact of nephrostomy balloon inflation volume on post percutaneous nephrolithotomy hemorrhage.

Authors:  Firas Azar Khori; Mohannad Mueen Al-Naser; Ashraf Suleiman Al-Majali; Mohammad Abdelfattah Al-Serhan; Awad Bakheet Al-Kaabneh; Abdelhakim Saleh Ni'mate; Ayman Ahmad Al-Qaralleh; Abdullah Muhammad Alrababaah; Samer Gaith Al-Jfout; Nizar Jamal Al-Saidah; Ali Ahmad Al-Asmer; Belal Abdullah Al-Khawaldah; Monther Ata Alemoush; Anees Adel Al-Hjazeen
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-08-31

6.  Reducing postoperative morbidity of mini-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Would it help if blood vessels are left unharmed during puncture? A CONSORT-prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Congcong Xu; Sheng Feng; Caixiu Lin; Yichun Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Predictors of urosepsis in struvite stone patients after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Justin Yh Chan; Victor Kf Wong; Julie Wong; Ryan F Paterson; Dirk Lange; Ben H Chew; Kymora B Scotland
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

8.  Predictors of post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy sepsis: The Northern Malaysian experience.

Authors:  Khai Yeong Teh; Teck Meng Tham
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2021-04-13

9.  Unplanned 30-day readmission rates in patients undergoing endo-urological surgeries for upper urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Siddharth Pandey; Ajay Aggarwal; Deepanshu Sharma; Gaurav Garg; Samarth Agarwal; Ashish Sharma; Satyanarayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-08-31

10.  Acute Kidney Injury Post-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL): Prospective Outcomes from a University Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Sunil Pillai; Akshay Kriplani; Arun Chawla; Bhaskar Somani; Akhilesh Pandey; Ravindra Prabhu; Anupam Choudhury; Shruti Pandit; Ravi Taori; Padmaraj Hegde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.