Matthew R Grossman1, Matthew J Lipshaw2, Rachel R Osborn3, Adam K Berkwitt2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; and matthew.grossman@yale.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; and. 3. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a growing problem and poses a significant burden on the health care system. The traditional Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (FNASS) assessment approach may lead to unnecessary opioid treatment of infants with NAS. We developed a novel assessment approach and describe its effect on the management of infants with NAS. METHODS: We retrospectively compared treatment decisions of 50 consecutive opioid-exposed infants managed on the inpatient unit at the Yale New Haven Children's Hospital. All infants had FNASS scores recorded every 2 to 6 hours but were managed by using the Eat, Sleep, Console (ESC) assessment approach. Actual treatment decisions made by using the ESC approach were compared with predicted treatment decisions based on recorded FNASS scores. The primary outcome was postnatal treatment with morphine. RESULTS: By using the ESC approach, 6 infants (12%) were treated with morphine compared with 31 infants (62%) predicted to be treated with morphine by using the FNASS approach (P < .001). The ESC approach started or increased morphine on 8 days (2.7%) compared with 76 days (25.7%) predicted by using the FNASS approach (P < .001). There were no readmissions or adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Infants managed by using the ESC approach were treated with morphine significantly less frequently than they would have been by using the FNASS approach. The ESC approach is an effective method for the management of infants with NAS that limits pharmacologic treatment and may lead to substantial reductions in length of stay.
OBJECTIVES:Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a growing problem and poses a significant burden on the health care system. The traditional Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (FNASS) assessment approach may lead to unnecessary opioid treatment of infants with NAS. We developed a novel assessment approach and describe its effect on the management of infants with NAS. METHODS: We retrospectively compared treatment decisions of 50 consecutive opioid-exposed infants managed on the inpatient unit at the Yale New Haven Children's Hospital. All infants had FNASS scores recorded every 2 to 6 hours but were managed by using the Eat, Sleep, Console (ESC) assessment approach. Actual treatment decisions made by using the ESC approach were compared with predicted treatment decisions based on recorded FNASS scores. The primary outcome was postnatal treatment with morphine. RESULTS: By using the ESC approach, 6 infants (12%) were treated with morphine compared with 31 infants (62%) predicted to be treated with morphine by using the FNASS approach (P < .001). The ESC approach started or increased morphine on 8 days (2.7%) compared with 76 days (25.7%) predicted by using the FNASS approach (P < .001). There were no readmissions or adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS:Infants managed by using the ESC approach were treated with morphine significantly less frequently than they would have been by using the FNASS approach. The ESC approach is an effective method for the management of infants with NAS that limits pharmacologic treatment and may lead to substantial reductions in length of stay.
Authors: Jessica N Snowden; A Akshatha; Robert D Annett; Margaret M Crawford; Abhik Das; Lori A Devlin; Rosemary D Higgins; Zhuopei Hu; Elizabeth Lindsay; Stephanie Merhar; Clare Campbell Nesmith; Heather Pratt-Chavez; Judith Ross; Alan E Simon; M Cody Smith; Christine B Turley; Anita Walden; Leslie Young; Bonny Whalen Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2019-07-19
Authors: Michael T Favara; Jessica Smith; Daniela Friedman; Margaret Lafferty; David Carola; Susan Adeniyi-Jones; Jay Greenspan; Zubair H Aghai Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Nathan M Money; Alan R Schroeder; Ricardo A Quinonez; Timmy Ho; Jennifer R Marin; Elizabeth R Wolf; Daniel J Morgan; Sanket S Dhruva; Eric R Coon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Andrew E Weller; Richard C Crist; Benjamin C Reiner; Glenn A Doyle; Wade H Berrettini Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Tomoyuki Mizuno; Brooks T McPhail; Suyog Kamatkar; Scott Wexelblatt; Laura Ward; Uwe Christians; Henry T Akinbi; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 6.447