| Literature DB >> 29262805 |
R Haridian Sosa-Barrios1,2, Victor Burguera3,4, Nuria Rodriguez-Mendiola3, Cristina Galeano3, Sandra Elias3, Gloria Ruiz-Roso3, Sara Jimenez-Alvaro3, Fernando Liaño3,5,6, Maite Rivera-Gorrin3,7,4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is an important technique providing relevant information to guide diagnosis and treatment in renal disease. As an invasive procedure it has complications. Most studies up to date have analysed complications related to bleeding. We report the largest single-center experience on routine Doppler ultrasound (US) assessment post PRB, showing incidence and natural history of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) post PRB.Entities:
Keywords: Arteriovenous fistula; Diagnostic and interventional nephrology; Doppler scan; Post biopsy complication; Renal biopsy; Renal ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29262805 PMCID: PMC5738109 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0786-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Fig. 1Color Doppler ultrasound image of an AV fistula in a transplant kidney. The image is from a convexe transducer showing the upper pole. The fistula is evident as a coloured area < 1 cm from the renal capsule. Red, yellow, green and blue are seen within it, suggesting high velocity, disturbed flow
Fig. 2The flow waveform is characterized by high velocities throughout with reduced systolic-diastolic difference and high, arterialized venous flow on spectral analysis
Baseline characteristics of NK and TK patients undergoing PRB with and without AVF
| NK | NK AVF | TK | TK AVF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| no AVF | no AVF | |||
| No. pts | 158 | 17 | 124 | 28 |
| Age | 57.8 ± 17.4 | 57.68 ± 19.81 | 51.8 ± 11.6 | 51.04 ± 8.33 |
| Gender (%male) | 57.6 | 34.4 | 71.7 | 65.5 |
| Diabetes (%) | 17.6 | 11.7 | 19.5 | 10.7 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 139.6 ± 11 | 139.3 ± 9 | 152.5 ± 12 | 150.2 ± 8 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 79.8 ± 8 | 79.3 ± 9 | 84.6 ± 6 | 86.1 ± 4 |
| Hypertension (%) | 60.8 | 64.7 | 85.8 | 85.7 |
| Passes | 1.32 | 1.39 | 1.45 | 1.33 |
| Cores | 1.11 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.11 |
| Glomeruli | 9.36 | 8.46 | 10.2 | 11.4 |
Post renal biopsy complication studies characteristics
| Study | Journal | Year | N. Pts | Kidney Type | Technique | Avf Considered | Routine US Post PRB | Incidence | Outcome | Done By |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deane C et al | Urol Radiol | 1992 | 126 | Transplant | Not specified | Yes | Yes | 17.5% | 63% closure | Not specified |
| Merkus JW et al | Br J Surg | 1993 | 62 | Transplant | Not specified | Yes | Within 2w post PRB | 10% | Closure/asymp. | Not specified |
| Brandenburg VM et al | Clin Nephrol | 2002 | 72 | Transplant | US guided | Yes | 4-6 h post PRB | 17% | 50% Closure | Nephrologist |
| Whittier WL et al | J Am Soc Nephrol | 2004 | 750 | Native | US guided by Radiologists | Yes | No | 0.4% | Not specified | Nephrologist |
| Shidham GB et al | Nephrology | 2005 | 645 | Native | US to locate | Yes | Inmediate post PRB | 0.64% | Embolized | Not specified |
| Maya ID et al | Semin Dial | 2007 | 129 | Native | Blind 64/US 65 | No | Inmediate post PRB | – | – | Rad/Nep |
| Tondel C et ala | Clin J Am Soc Nephrol | 2012 | 9288 | Native | US guided by Radiologists | No | No | – | – | Rad/Nep |
| Korbet SM et al | Am J Nephrology | 2014 | 1055 | Native | US guided by Radiologists | No | No | – | – | Rad/Nep |
| Lubomirova M et ala | OA Maced J Med Sci | 2015 | 516 | Both | US guided/Blind | Yes | 1 day post PRB | 0.8% | – | Nephrologist |
aMulticenter. Rad = Radiology. Nep = Nephrology