Literature DB >> 2926262

Facial nerve recovery after acoustic neuroma removal.

D A Moffat1, G R Croxson, D M Baguley, D G Hardy.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of 76 patients who underwent acoustic neuroma removal is reported. Facial nerve function prior to surgery and tumour size are assessed with respect to final facial nerve recovery and the need for surgical rehabilitation. Both pre-operative facial weakness and tumour size greater than 2.5 cm. are shown to be predictive factors of poor facial nerve recovery. Multiple surgical rehabilitative procedures are often required when inadequate function and/or cosmetic results are obtained. Primary nerve repair and facial-hypoglossal anastomosis give better rehabilitative results than dynamic and static procedures. The association of tumour size greater than 2.5 cm. with increased risk of poor facial recovery re-emphasizes the need to detect and remove acoustic neuromas at an early stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2926262     DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100108357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  3 in total

1.  Predictive value of postoperative electrophysiologic testing of the facial nerve after cerebellopontine angle surgery.

Authors:  S H Selesnick; G P Digoy; Y Ptachewich; M Rubin; J D Victor
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1998

2.  Prediction of facial nerve function after surgery for cerebellopontine angle tumors: use of a facial nerve stimulator and monitor.

Authors:  P J Kirkpatrick; G Watters; A J Strong; J R Walliker; M J Gleeson
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1991

3.  Cranial nerve preservation in surgery for large acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Andrew J Fishman; John G Golfinos; Noel Cohen; George Alexiades; Alexis H Jackman
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2004-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.