Alfonso Rodriguez-Lainz1, Mariana McDonald2, Maureen Fonseca-Ford1, Ana Penman-Aguilar3, Stephen H Waterman4, Benedict I Truman5, Martin S Cetron1, Chesley L Richards6. 1. 1 Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. 2 Office of the Director, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. 3 Office of Minority Health & Health Equity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. 4 Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. 5 Office of the Director, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 6. 6 Office of Public Health Scientific Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Despite increasing diversity in the US population, substantial gaps in collecting data on race, ethnicity, primary language, and nativity indicators persist in public health surveillance and monitoring systems. In addition, few systems provide questionnaires in foreign languages for inclusion of non-English speakers. We assessed (1) the extent of data collected on race, ethnicity, primary language, and nativity indicators (ie, place of birth, immigration status, and years in the United States) and (2) the use of data-collection instruments in non-English languages among Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-supported public health surveillance and monitoring systems in the United States. METHODS: We identified CDC-supported surveillance and health monitoring systems in place from 2010 through 2013 by searching CDC websites and other federal websites. For each system, we assessed its website, documentation, and publications for evidence of the variables of interest and use of data-collection instruments in non-English languages. We requested missing information from CDC program officials, as needed. RESULTS: Of 125 data systems, 100 (80%) collected data on race and ethnicity, 2 more collected data on ethnicity but not race, 26 (21%) collected data on racial/ethnic subcategories, 40 (32%) collected data on place of birth, 21 (17%) collected data on years in the United States, 14 (11%) collected data on immigration status, 13 (10%) collected data on primary language, and 29 (23%) used non-English data-collection instruments. Population-based surveys and disease registries more often collected data on detailed variables than did case-based, administrative, and multiple-source systems. CONCLUSIONS: More complete and accurate data on race, ethnicity, primary language, and nativity can improve the quality, representativeness, and usefulness of public health surveillance and monitoring systems to plan and evaluate targeted public health interventions to eliminate health disparities.
OBJECTIVE: Despite increasing diversity in the US population, substantial gaps in collecting data on race, ethnicity, primary language, and nativity indicators persist in public health surveillance and monitoring systems. In addition, few systems provide questionnaires in foreign languages for inclusion of non-English speakers. We assessed (1) the extent of data collected on race, ethnicity, primary language, and nativity indicators (ie, place of birth, immigration status, and years in the United States) and (2) the use of data-collection instruments in non-English languages among Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-supported public health surveillance and monitoring systems in the United States. METHODS: We identified CDC-supported surveillance and health monitoring systems in place from 2010 through 2013 by searching CDC websites and other federal websites. For each system, we assessed its website, documentation, and publications for evidence of the variables of interest and use of data-collection instruments in non-English languages. We requested missing information from CDC program officials, as needed. RESULTS: Of 125 data systems, 100 (80%) collected data on race and ethnicity, 2 more collected data on ethnicity but not race, 26 (21%) collected data on racial/ethnic subcategories, 40 (32%) collected data on place of birth, 21 (17%) collected data on years in the United States, 14 (11%) collected data on immigration status, 13 (10%) collected data on primary language, and 29 (23%) used non-English data-collection instruments. Population-based surveys and disease registries more often collected data on detailed variables than did case-based, administrative, and multiple-source systems. CONCLUSIONS: More complete and accurate data on race, ethnicity, primary language, and nativity can improve the quality, representativeness, and usefulness of public health surveillance and monitoring systems to plan and evaluate targeted public health interventions to eliminate health disparities.
Keywords:
ethnic groups; health disparities measurement; immigrant; language barriers; nativity; population surveillance
Authors: Rashida Dorsey; Garth Graham; Sherry Glied; David Meyers; Carolyn Clancy; Howard Koh Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Andrea L Steege; Sherry L Baron; Suzanne M Marsh; Cammie Chaumont Menéndez; John R Myers Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Stephen J Liu; Kashif Iqbal; Sue Shallow; Suzanne Speers; Elena Rizzo; Kristin Gerard; Tasha Poissant; R Monina Klevens Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2015-02
Authors: Beth L Rubenstein; Stefanie Campbell; Alysha R Meyers; David A Crum; Clifford S Mitchell; Jeré Hutson; D'Ann L Williams; Schabbethai S Senesie; Zunera Gilani; Steven Reynolds; Bianca Alba; Stephanie Tavitian; Kristian Billings; Lina Saintus; Stephen B Martin; Hugh Mainzer Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Michael A Flynn; Pietra Check; Andrea L Steege; Jacqueline M Sivén; Laura N Syron Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alissa C Kress; Asia Asberry; Julio Dicent Taillepierre; Michelle M Johns; Pattie Tucker; Ana Penman-Aguilar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Radhika Gharpure; Zachary A Marsh; Danielle M Tack; Sarah A Collier; Jonathan Strysko; Logan Ray; Daniel C Payne; Amanda G Garcia-Williams Journal: J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 5.235
Authors: Oluwafemi P Owodunni; Elliott R Haut; Dauryne L Shaffer; Deborah B Hobson; Jiangxia Wang; Gayane Yenokyan; Peggy S Kraus; Jonathan K Aboagye; Katherine L Florecki; Kristen L W Webster; Christine G Holzmueller; Michael B Streiff; Brandyn D Lau Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 3.240