Literature DB >> 29260798

Potential for intermittent stimulation of nucleus basalis of Meynert to impact treatment of alzheimer's disease.

David T Blake1, Alvin V Terry2, Marc Plagenhoef2, Christos Constantinidis3, Ruifeng Liu4.   

Abstract

The brain's cholinergic arousal pathways decline in parallel with the brain's executive functions in aging and Alzheimer's Disease. The frontline and currently most effective approach to treating Alzheimer's disease is the administration of cholinesterase inhibitors, which, in a dose dependent manner, improve the symptoms of cognitive decline over the first months of treatment before further decline occurs. We recently showed that intermittent deep brain stimulation of the nucleus basalis of Meynert improves working memory function in young adult monkeys, and that this improvement depended on cholinergic function. Within minutes, the monkeys' ability to remember stimuli over a delay period improved. Over months, the monkeys performed the working memory task better even in the absence of stimulation. Here, we show historical data from our monkey colony in which more than two dozen animals have performed the same behavioral task to asymptotic performance levels. Using a distribution based on our historical data, we estimate that the monkeys receiving intermittent stimulation leapt over the performance level of 32-44 percent of peer animals in the first several months after stimulation was initiated. Implications for a parallel increase in cognitive function for early Alzheimer's patients are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer's Disease; acetylcholine; deep brain stimulation

Year:  2017        PMID: 29260798      PMCID: PMC5731511          DOI: 10.1080/19420889.2017.1389359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Integr Biol        ISSN: 1942-0889


The cholinergic hypothesis of cognitive deficits related to age and Alzheimer's Disease dates to the 1970s, when scientists began to notice clear correlations between the losses in cognition and cholinergic function. Physiological abnormalities observed in Alzheimer's Disease include choline transport, acetylcholine release, expression of cholinergic receptors, neurotrophin support, and perhaps axonal transport. Cholinesterase inhibitors and some cholinergic agonists improve the cognitive deficits associated with Alzheimer's Disease, while some anticholinergic agents worsen specific cognitive deficits observed in the dementia. The relationship between cholinergic function and cognition are regionally restricted to the brain's cholinergic arousal pathways, which notably include the pedunculopontine and laterodorsal tegmental nucleus, the nucleus basalis of Meynert and substantia innominata, the medial septum, and the diagonal band of Broca. The frontline treatment for Alzheimer's Disease is the administration of cholinesterase inhibitors, the most prevalent of which is donepezil (Aricept). Subjects are typically prescribed 5 mg/day of donepezil, then increase their dosage, if tolerated, to 10 mg, and finally up to 23 mg. The highest dose leads over 30% of patients to discontinue use from the side effect profile which most notably includes nausea, vomiting, and related gastrointestinal symptoms. In patients who tolerate the highest dose, cognitive symptoms improve across several cognitive domains over a three month period. By one year after treatment, cognitive function has returned to the baseline that existed before donepezil use, and declines with aging thereafter. We explored the contribution of cholinergic modulation to executive function by combining deep brain stimulation of the nucleus basalis of Meynert with a working memory task in the Rhesus monkey. We found that concurrent intermittent stimulation boosted working memory function. Although animals had been trained to asymptotic levels of performance before initiating stimulation, in the following months their working memory improved even in the absence of concurrent stimulation. The magnitude of the long-term effect was approximately four times as large as the magnitude of the short-term effect. However, the changes in performance in these monkeys could not be easily translated to the projected impact on a human who could receive the same treatment. We therefore compiled a database of working memory performance of 25 Rhesus monkeys from our colony, all of which had performed the same task to asymptotic performance levels for thousands of behavioral trials. For each animal, we found a working memory delay interval for which the percentage of correct trials was as close to 80% as possible, and always between 70 and 90 percent correct, at the conclusion of asymptotic training. We scaled that delay to estimate the interval at which that animal would have been correct in 80% of the trials by interpolation and comparison with memory performance in our published work. Lastly, we superimposed the long-term changes in memory performance of our three animals, using an interval for which they were correct on 80% of the trials, on this historic distribution. As can be seen in Fig. 1, the delays changed from 1.5 to 8 seconds, 3 to 10 seconds, and 6 to 30 seconds. These changes corresponded to percentile shifts of 32, 36, and 44 percent, and spanned a large range of the distribution of working memory abilities.
Figure 1.

Shifts in working memory delay as percentile changes. The working memory delay at which animals were 80% correct was estimated based on data from 25 historical records from our colony. The change in percentile of three animals trained with intermittent stimulation are shown with dotted and dashed lines.

Shifts in working memory delay as percentile changes. The working memory delay at which animals were 80% correct was estimated based on data from 25 historical records from our colony. The change in percentile of three animals trained with intermittent stimulation are shown with dotted and dashed lines. The remaining question is how a 30–40 percentile shift in performance would alter age-related decline. Cholinergic modulation of cognition is reasonably comparable in older and younger subjects. In working memory, a 30 percentile change would make an average human 65 year old have a superior working memory to an average 25 year old, thereby erasing all age related decline in working memory. The earliest deficits differentiating an Alzheimer's Disease patient from a control are in delayed recall, a measure of episodic memory, and the deficit is a little more than one standard deviation. The question of how intermittent stimulation could impact such a patient group remains an open one, with many caveats about the potential pitfalls of translation. However, the potential to markedly improve cognition in Alzheimer's patients is a straightforward prediction from these studies.
  13 in total

Review 1.  On neurodegenerative diseases, models, and treatment strategies: lessons learned and lessons forgotten a generation following the cholinergic hypothesis.

Authors:  R T Bartus
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 2.  Hypothalamic regulation of sleep and circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Clifford B Saper; Thomas E Scammell; Jun Lu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Health economic evaluation of treatments for Alzheimer's disease: impact of new diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  A Wimo; C Ballard; C Brayne; S Gauthier; R Handels; R W Jones; L Jonsson; A S Khachaturian; M Kramberger
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Intermittent Stimulation of the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert Improves Working Memory in Adult Monkeys.

Authors:  Ruifeng Liu; Jonathan Crawford; Patrick M Callahan; Alvin V Terry; Christos Constantinidis; David T Blake
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Alzheimer's disease: a disorder of cortical cholinergic innervation.

Authors:  J T Coyle; D L Price; M R DeLong
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Cognitive functions of cortical acetylcholine: toward a unifying hypothesis.

Authors:  M Sarter; J P Bruno
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1997-02

7.  Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia: loss of neurons in the basal forebrain.

Authors:  P J Whitehouse; D L Price; R G Struble; A W Clark; J T Coyle; M R Delon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  High-dose donepezil (23 mg/day) for the treatment of moderate and severe Alzheimer's disease: drug profile and clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Cummings; David Geldmacher; Martin Farlow; Marwan Sabbagh; Daniel Christensen; Peter Betz
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.243

9.  Effectiveness of treatment with donepezil hydrochloride and changes in regional cerebral blood flow in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Tsunetaka Yoshida; Sangkil Ha-Kawa; Masafumi Yoshimura; Kenji Nobuhara; Toshihiko Kinoshita; Satoshi Sawada
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 10.  The cholinergic hypothesis of age and Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive deficits: recent challenges and their implications for novel drug development.

Authors:  A V Terry; J J Buccafusco
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  3 in total

1.  Rhythmicity of Prefrontal Local Field Potentials after Nucleus Basalis Stimulation.

Authors:  Balbir Singh; Xue-Lian Qi; David T Blake; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-02-03

2.  Nucleus basalis stimulation enhances working memory by stabilizing stimulus representations in primate prefrontal cortical activity.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Qi; Ruifeng Liu; Balbir Singh; David Bestue; Albert Compte; Almira I Vazdarjanova; David T Blake; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 3.  Cholinergic Deep Brain Stimulation for Memory and Cognitive Disorders.

Authors:  Saravanan Subramaniam; David T Blake; Christos Constantinidis
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.472

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.