| Literature DB >> 29260667 |
Glenn Patriquin, Michael Drebot, Teri Cole, Robbin Lindsay, Emily Schleihauf, B Lynn Johnston, Kristina Dimitrova, Maya Traykova-Andonova, Angela Mask, David Haldane, Todd F Hatchette.
Abstract
Using residual serum samples from Nova Scotia, Canada, we found that 87.8% of tested deer and an estimated 20.6% of the human population were infected with Jamestown Canyon virus. Human seropositivity reached 48.2% in 1 region. This virus may be an underrecognized cause of disease in Nova Scotia.Entities:
Keywords: Atlantic; Bunyaviridae; California serogroup; Canada; Jamestown Canyon virus; Nova Scotia; arbovirus; bunyavirus; seroprevalence; viral encephalitis; viral meningitis; viruses; zoonotic
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29260667 PMCID: PMC5749476 DOI: 10.3201/eid2401.170484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
FigurePopulation density and boundaries of DHAs in Nova Scotia, Canada, at the time of sample collection from white-tailed deer in 2009 and humans in 2012 for study of Jamestown Canyon virus seroprevalence. H, capital city of Halifax; S, Sydney; A, community A; B, community B. Numbers on map indicate number of human serum samples screened in each DHA. Population density map modified from its original format (). DHA, District Health Authority.
White-tailed deer seropositivity for Jamestown Canyon virus, Nova Scotia, Canada*
| No. white-tailed deer | No. (%) seropositive | No. seronegative | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, n =82 | 72 (87.8) | 10 | NA* |
| Community | 1.000 | ||
| A, n =40 | 35 (87.5) | 5 | |
| B, n =42 | 37 (88.1) | 5 |
|
| Sex | 0.713 | ||
| Male, n =40 | 35 (87.5) | 5 | |
| Female, n =37 | 34 (91.9) | 3 | |
| Unknown, n =5 | 3 (60.0) | 2 | |
| Age | 0.0567 | ||
| Adult, n =58 | 54 (93.1) | 4 | |
| Immature, n =24 | 18 (75.0) | 6 | |
| *NA, not applicable. | |||
Human Jamestown Canyon virus seropositivity by sex and age, Nova Scotia, Canada
| Characteristic | No. tested | No. (%) positive | Adjusted proportion (95% CI) | p value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.013 | |||
| M | 151 | 51 (33.8) | 26.8 (19.9–35.0) | |
| F | 150 | 30 (20.0) | 14.4 (9.3–21.5) | |
| Age group, y | 0.024 | |||
| 10–19 | 43 | 6 (14.0) | 10.8 (4.0–25.8) | |
| 20–29 | 54 | 13 (24.1) | 20.4 (11.0–34.5) | |
| 30–39 | 52 | 12 (23.1) | 14.1 (6.9–26.7) | |
| 40–49 | 60 | 15 (25.0) | 20.4 (1.6–33.3) | |
| 50–59 | 61 | 21 (34.4) | 27.8 (17.1–41.7) | |
| 60–64 | 31 | 14 (45.2) | 33.0 (17.7–53.0) | |
| District Health Authority | 0.004 | |||
| 1 | 81 | 39 (48.2) | 48.2† (37.4–59.1) | |
| 2–8 | 115 | 26 (22.6) | 22.6† (15.8–31.4) | |
| 9 | 105 | 16 (15.2) | 15.2† (9.5–23.5) |
|
| Total no. | 301 | 81 (26.9) | 20.6 (16.0–25.9) |
*Pearson χ2 for test by DHA; corrected Pearson χ2 for test by sex; logistic regression test for trend by age group. †Adjustment was unnecessary for estimates made by the DHA because weighting was done by this authority.