Literature DB >> 29260537

Diffuse optical tomography using semiautomated coregistered ultrasound measurements.

Atahar Mostafa1, Hamed Vavadi2, K M Shihab Uddin1, Quing Zhu1.   

Abstract

Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) has demonstrated huge potential in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring. DOT image reconstruction guided by ultrasound (US) improves the diffused light localization and lesion reconstruction accuracy. However, DOT reconstruction depends on tumor geometry provided by coregistered US. Experienced operators can manually measure these lesion parameters; however, training and measurement time are needed. The wide clinical use of this technique depends on its robustness and faster imaging reconstruction capability. This article introduces a semiautomated procedure that automatically extracts lesion information from US images and incorporates it into the optical reconstruction. An adaptive threshold-based image segmentation is used to obtain tumor boundaries. For some US images, posterior shadow can extend to the chest wall and make the detection of deeper lesion boundary difficult. This problem can be solved using a Hough transform. The proposed procedure was validated from data of 20 patients. Optical reconstruction results using the proposed procedure were compared with those reconstructed using extracted tumor information from an experienced user. Mean optical absorption obtained from manual measurement was 0.21±0.06  cm-1 for malignant and 0.12±0.06  cm-1 for benign cases, whereas for the proposed method it was 0.24±0.08  cm-1 and 0.12±0.05  cm-1, respectively. (2017) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  digital image processing; tomographic image processing; tomography; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29260537      PMCID: PMC5746059          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.12.121610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  19 in total

1.  Estimate of tissue composition in malignant and benign breast lesions by time-domain optical mammography.

Authors:  Giovanna Quarto; Lorenzo Spinelli; Antonio Pifferi; Alessandro Torricelli; Rinaldo Cubeddu; Francesca Abbate; Nicola Balestreri; Simona Menna; Enrico Cassano; Paola Taroni
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Fast and efficient image reconstruction for high density diffuse optical imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  Xue Wu; Adam T Eggebrecht; Silvina L Ferradal; Joseph P Culver; Hamid Dehghani
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system.

Authors:  B Fischl; M I Sereno; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Diffuse Optics for Tissue Monitoring and Tomography.

Authors:  T Durduran; R Choe; W B Baker; A G Yodh
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2010-07

6.  Improving breast cancer diagnosis by reducing chest wall effect in diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Feifei Zhou; Atahar Mostafa; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Automated data selection method to improve robustness of diffuse optical tomography for breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  Hamed Vavadi; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Breast cancer detection based on incremental biochemical and physiological properties of breast cancers: a six-year, two-site study.

Authors:  Britton Chance; Shoko Nioka; Jun Zhang; Emily F Conant; Emily Hwang; Susanne Briest; Susan G Orel; Mitchell D Schnall; Brian J Czerniecki
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 9.  Review of MR image segmentation techniques using pattern recognition.

Authors:  J C Bezdek; L O Hall; L P Clarke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Parametric estimation of 3D tubular structures for diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Fridrik Larusson; Pamela G Anderson; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Misha E Kilmer; Angelo Sassaroli; Sergio Fantini; Eric L Miller
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  4 in total

1.  Compact ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography system for breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  Hamed Vavadi; Atahar Mostafa; Feifei Zhou; K M Shihab Uddin; Murad Althobaiti; Chen Xu; Rajeev Bansal; Foluso Ademuyiwa; Steven Poplack; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Reducing image artifact in diffuse optical tomography by iterative perturbation correction based on multiwavelength measurements.

Authors:  K M Shihab Uddin; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Enhanced diffuse optical tomographic reconstruction using concurrent ultrasound information.

Authors:  G Di Sciacca; L Di Sieno; A Farina; P Lanka; E Venturini; P Panizza; A Dalla Mora; A Pifferi; P Taroni; S R Arridge
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  An Automated Preprocessing Method for Diffuse Optical Tomography to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Murad Althobaiti; Hamed Vavadi; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.