Literature DB >> 29260346

Assessment of mitral regurgitation by 3-dimensional proximal flow convergence using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with echo-Doppler.

Lior Gorodisky1, Yoram Agmon2,3, Moshe Porat1, Sobhi Abadi4, Jonathan Lessick5,6.   

Abstract

To test the feasibility of assessing mitral regurgitation (MR) severity using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) 4D velocity vectors to quantify regurgitant volume (RVol) by analysis of the proximal flow convergence, compared to Doppler based proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) and CMR volume-based methods. In a prospectively designed study, 27 patients with various grades of MR underwent CMR and echo-Doppler on the same day. By CMR, multiple slices were obtained parallel to the mitral valve by phase-contrast imaging, using 3D velocity vectors, as well as short-axis cine images for left and right ventricular volume measurements. Using dedicated software developed in our laboratory, the perimeter of the proximal flow convergence region was semi-automatically measured for each temporal phase, and for each short-axis slice. The CMR-PISA RVol was calculated as the sum of PISA perimeters throughout systole, multiplied by slice width. For comparison, CMR-volumetric RVol was calculated by 2 methods: Volumetric (difference between left and right ventricular stroke volumes) and Flow-based (stroke volume -aortic flow). Echo-PISA RVol was calculated by echo-Doppler based PISA method. RVol by CMR-PISA correlated highly with echo-PISA (r = 0.87) and with CMR-volumetric (r = 0.86) and CMR-flow (r = 0.72). For comparison Doppler-RVol and CMR-volume-based RVol had r = 0.83. On average CMR-PISA was 16 ± 25 ml less than echo-PISA, but 12 ± 22 ml larger than CMR-volumetric RVol. The observed 3D shape of the PISA envelope by 4D-CMR resembled a hemiellipsoid rather than a hemisphere. This feasibility study suggests that CMR-based 4D-PISA may be able to assess MR severity quantitatively without any geometric assumptions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided analysis; Proximal isovelocity surface area; Regurgitant volume; Valve disease

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29260346     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1290-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  20 in total

1.  Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  William A Zoghbi; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Elyse Foster; Paul A Grayburn; Carol D Kraft; Robert A Levine; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Catherine M Otto; Miguel A Quinones; Harry Rakowski; William J Stewart; Alan Waggoner; Neil J Weissman
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Quantification of regurgitant fraction in mitral regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques.

Authors:  Mark W S Kon; Saul G Myerson; Neil E Moat; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2004-07

3.  Proximal flow convergence region as assessed by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: challenging the hemispheric assumption.

Authors:  Chaim Yosefy; Robert A Levine; Jorge Solis; Mordehay Vaturi; Mark D Handschumacher; Judy Hung
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Determination of regurgitant orifice area with the use of a new three-dimensional flow convergence geometric assumption in functional mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Yoshiki Matsumura; Giuseppe Saracino; Kenichi Sugioka; Hung Tran; Neil L Greenberg; Nozomi Wada; Manatomo Toyono; Shota Fukuda; Takeshi Hozumi; James D Thomas; Junichi Yoshikawa; Minoru Yoshiyama; Takahiro Shiota
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Seth Uretsky; Linda Gillam; Roberto Lang; Farooq A Chaudhry; Edgar Argulian; Azhar Supariwala; Srinivasa Gurram; Kavya Jain; Marjorie Subero; James J Jang; Randy Cohen; Steven D Wolff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Inline directionally independent peak velocity evaluation reduces error in peak antegrade velocity estimation in patients referred for cardiac valvular assessment.

Authors:  Philip A Hodnett; Christopher B Glielmi; Amir H Davarpanah; Timothy G Scanlon; Emily Ward; Jeremy D Collins; Peter J Weale; James C Carr
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Evaluation of size and dynamics of the inferior vena cava as an index of right-sided cardiac function.

Authors:  F L Moreno; A D Hagan; J R Holmen; T A Pryor; R D Strickland; C H Castle
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Effective regurgitant orifice area: a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept.

Authors:  M Enriquez-Sarano; J B Seward; K R Bailey; A J Tajik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Determination of Clinical Outcome in Mitral Regurgitation With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Quantification.

Authors:  Saul G Myerson; Joanna d'Arcy; Jonathan P Christiansen; Laura E Dobson; Raad Mohiaddin; Jane M Francis; Bernard Prendergast; John P Greenwood; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Quantification of LV function and mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: multi-center variability and consensus contours.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; David A Bluemke; Brett R Cowan; Matthias G Friedrich; Christopher M Kramer; Raymond Kwong; Sven Plein; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Jos J M Westenberg; Alistair A Young; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Evaluation of mitral regurgitation : How much quantification do we need?]

Authors:  F Kreidel; T Ruf; A Tamm; M Geyer; T Emrich; R S von Bardeleben
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  A Systematic Review of 4D-Flow MRI Derived Mitral Regurgitation Quantification Methods.

Authors:  Benjamin Fidock; Natasha Barker; Nithin Balasubramanian; Gareth Archer; Graham Fent; Abdullah Al-Mohammad; James Richardson; Laurence O'Toole; Norman Briffa; Alexander Rothman; Rob van der Geest; Rod Hose; James M Wild; Andrew J Swift; Pankaj Garg
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-08-02

Review 3.  Assessment of mitral valve regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Andrew J Swift; Liang Zhong; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Tino Ebbers; Jos Westenberg; Michael D Hope; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Jeroen J Bax; Saul G Myerson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Rationale and clinical applications of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of valvular heart disease: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Miroslawa Gorecka; Malenka M Bissell; David M Higgins; Pankaj Garg; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.903

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.