Literature DB >> 29260229

Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials.

Carrol Gamble1, Ashma Krishan2, Deborah Stocken3,4, Steff Lewis5, Edmund Juszczak6, Caroline Doré7, Paula R Williamson1, Douglas G Altman8, Alan Montgomery9, Pilar Lim10, Jesse Berlin11, Stephen Senn12, Simon Day13, Yolanda Barbachano14, Elizabeth Loder15.   

Abstract

Importance: While guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials exists, there is an absence of guidance covering the required content of statistical analysis plans (SAPs) to support transparency and reproducibility. Objective: To develop recommendations for a minimum set of items that should be addressed in SAPs for clinical trials, developed with input from statisticians, previous guideline authors, journal editors, regulators, and funders. Design: Funders and regulators (n = 39) of randomized trials were contacted and the literature was searched to identify existing guidance; a survey of current practice was conducted across the network of UK Clinical Research Collaboration-registered trial units (n = 46, 1 unit had 2 responders) and a Delphi survey (n = 73 invited participants) was conducted to establish consensus on SAPs. The Delphi survey was sent to statisticians in trial units who completed the survey of current practice (n = 46), CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) and SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guideline authors (n = 16), pharmaceutical industry statisticians (n = 3), journal editors (n = 9), and regulators (n = 2) (3 participants were included in 2 groups each), culminating in a consensus meeting attended by experts (N = 12) with representatives from each group. The guidance subsequently underwent critical review by statisticians from the surveyed trial units and members of the expert panel of the consensus meeting (N = 51), followed by piloting of the guidance document in the SAPs of 5 trials. Findings: No existing guidance was identified. The registered trials unit survey (46 responses) highlighted diversity in current practice and confirmed support for developing guidance. The Delphi survey (54 of 73, 74% participants completing both rounds) reached consensus on 42% (n = 46) of 110 items. The expert panel (N = 12) agreed that 63 items should be included in the guidance, with an additional 17 items identified as important but may be referenced elsewhere. Following critical review and piloting, some overlapping items were combined, leaving 55 items. Conclusions and Relevance: Recommendations are provided for a minimum set of items that should be addressed and included in SAPs for clinical trials. Trial registration, protocols, and statistical analysis plans are critically important in ensuring appropriate reporting of clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29260229     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.18556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  107 in total

1.  The Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Dimairo; Philip Pallmann; James Wason; Susan Todd; Thomas Jaki; Steven A Julious; Adrian P Mander; Christopher J Weir; Franz Koenig; Marc K Walton; Jon P Nicholl; Elizabeth Coates; Katie Biggs; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Michael A Proschan; John A Scott; Yuki Ando; Daniel Hind; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-06-17

2.  Statistical considerations in reporting cardiovascular research.

Authors:  Merry L Lindsey; Gillian A Gray; Susan K Wood; Douglas Curran-Everett
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Pharmacoepidemiology: Using randomised control trials and observational studies in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Thomas M Caparrotta; James W Dear; Helen M Colhoun; David J Webb
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  How to assess applicability and methodological quality of comparative studies of operative interventions in orthopedic trauma surgery.

Authors:  Kim Luijken; Bryan J M van de Wall; Lotty Hooft; Luke P H Leenen; R Marijn Houwert; Rolf H H Groenwold
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  The RESOLVE Trial for people with chronic low back pain: statistical analysis plan.

Authors:  Matthew K Bagg; Serigne Lo; Aidan G Cashin; Rob D Herbert; Neil E O'Connell; Hopin Lee; Markus Hübscher; Benedict M Wand; Edel O'Hagan; Rodrigo R N Rizzo; G Lorimer Moseley; Tasha R Stanton; Christopher G Maher; Stephen Goodall; Sopany Saing; James H McAuley
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Principles of Good Clinical Trial Design.

Authors:  Ming-Wen An; Quyen Duong; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Study of Peri-Articular Anaesthetic for Replacement of the Knee (SPAARK): statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of peri-articular liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine hydrochloride compared with bupivacaine hydrochloride alone.

Authors:  Jamie R Stokes; Ariel Wang; Lisa Poulton; Ines Rombach; Hemant Pandit; Ruth Knight
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Baby-OSCAR: Outcome after Selective early treatment for Closure of patent ductus ARteriosus in preterm babies-a statistical analysis plan for short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bell; Samir Gupta; Edmund Juszczak; Pollyanna Hardy; Louise Linsell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  The adaptive designs CONSORT extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Dimairo; Philip Pallmann; James Wason; Susan Todd; Thomas Jaki; Steven A Julious; Adrian P Mander; Christopher J Weir; Franz Koenig; Marc K Walton; Jon P Nicholl; Elizabeth Coates; Katie Biggs; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Michael A Proschan; John A Scott; Yuki Ando; Daniel Hind; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Resuscitation in Paediatric Sepsis Using Metabolic Resuscitation-A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (RESPOND PICU): Study Protocol and Analysis Plan.

Authors:  Luregn J Schlapbach; Kristen Gibbons; Roberta Ridolfi; Amanda Harley; Michele Cree; Debbie Long; David Buckley; Simon Erickson; Marino Festa; Shane George; Megan King; Puneet Singh; Sainath Raman; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.