OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of sleeve gastrectomy on shoe size one year after the procedure. To our knowledge, no study has yet been conducted addressing this issue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were prepared for sleeve gastrectomy were eligible for the study, and all data and preoperative shoe sizes were recorded in our prospective database. At the 12th month of follow-up, each patient's excess weight loss % was calculated, and their shoe sizes were recorded by verbal report. Arbitrary or half-size changes were not taken into consideration. The probability of a change in shoe size and the effects of age, sex, preoperative body mass index, and 12th month excess weight loss % on this change were investigated. p<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: The subjects of the study were 212 patients who completed their 12-month follow-ups after sleeve gastrectomy between January 2012 and February 2016. The mean shoe size was 41.5; this decreased to 40.5 one year after sleeve gastrectomy (p<0.001). In patients with body mass index (BMI)>50, both the mean decrease (p=0.008) and the percentage of at least two size decreases (p=0.009) were significantly higher than those in patients with BMI<40. Age, sex, and excess weight loss % did not have any significant effects on shoe size. CONCLUSION: Sleeve gastrectomy was clearly associated with decrease in shoe size after 12 months. Only preoperative body mass index was found to be directly associated with this decrease.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of sleeve gastrectomy on shoe size one year after the procedure. To our knowledge, no study has yet been conducted addressing this issue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were prepared for sleeve gastrectomy were eligible for the study, and all data and preoperative shoe sizes were recorded in our prospective database. At the 12th month of follow-up, each patient's excess weight loss % was calculated, and their shoe sizes were recorded by verbal report. Arbitrary or half-size changes were not taken into consideration. The probability of a change in shoe size and the effects of age, sex, preoperative body mass index, and 12th month excess weight loss % on this change were investigated. p<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: The subjects of the study were 212 patients who completed their 12-month follow-ups after sleeve gastrectomy between January 2012 and February 2016. The mean shoe size was 41.5; this decreased to 40.5 one year after sleeve gastrectomy (p<0.001). In patients with body mass index (BMI)>50, both the mean decrease (p=0.008) and the percentage of at least two size decreases (p=0.009) were significantly higher than those in patients with BMI<40. Age, sex, and excess weight loss % did not have any significant effects on shoe size. CONCLUSION: Sleeve gastrectomy was clearly associated with decrease in shoe size after 12 months. Only preoperative body mass index was found to be directly associated with this decrease.
Authors: Daniel P Schauer; David E Arterburn; Edward H Livingston; Karen J Coleman; Steve Sidney; David Fisher; Patrick OʼConnor; David Fischer; Mark H Eckman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: David E Arterburn; Maren K Olsen; Valerie A Smith; Edward H Livingston; Lynn Van Scoyoc; William S Yancy; George Eid; Hollis Weidenbacher; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Emily E Johnson; Annie N Simpson; Jillian B Harvey; Mark A Lockett; Karl T Byrne; Kit N Simpson Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Marie Ng; Tom Fleming; Margaret Robinson; Blake Thomson; Nicholas Graetz; Christopher Margono; Erin C Mullany; Stan Biryukov; Cristiana Abbafati; Semaw Ferede Abera; Jerry P Abraham; Niveen M E Abu-Rmeileh; Tom Achoki; Fadia S AlBuhairan; Zewdie A Alemu; Rafael Alfonso; Mohammed K Ali; Raghib Ali; Nelson Alvis Guzman; Walid Ammar; Palwasha Anwari; Amitava Banerjee; Simon Barquera; Sanjay Basu; Derrick A Bennett; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Jed Blore; Norberto Cabral; Ismael Campos Nonato; Jung-Chen Chang; Rajiv Chowdhury; Karen J Courville; Michael H Criqui; David K Cundiff; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Lalit Dandona; Adrian Davis; Anand Dayama; Samath D Dharmaratne; Eric L Ding; Adnan M Durrani; Alireza Esteghamati; Farshad Farzadfar; Derek F J Fay; Valery L Feigin; Abraham Flaxman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Atsushi Goto; Mark A Green; Rajeev Gupta; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Graeme J Hankey; Heather C Harewood; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon Hay; Lucia Hernandez; Abdullatif Husseini; Bulat T Idrisov; Nayu Ikeda; Farhad Islami; Eiman Jahangir; Simerjot K Jassal; Sun Ha Jee; Mona Jeffreys; Jost B Jonas; Edmond K Kabagambe; Shams Eldin Ali Hassan Khalifa; Andre Pascal Kengne; Yousef Saleh Khader; Young-Ho Khang; Daniel Kim; Ruth W Kimokoti; Jonas M Kinge; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Soewarta Kosen; Gene Kwan; Taavi Lai; Mall Leinsalu; Yichong Li; Xiaofeng Liang; Shiwei Liu; Giancarlo Logroscino; Paulo A Lotufo; Yuan Lu; Jixiang Ma; Nana Kwaku Mainoo; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ali H Mokdad; Joanna Moschandreas; Mohsen Naghavi; Aliya Naheed; Devina Nand; K M Venkat Narayan; Erica Leigh Nelson; Marian L Neuhouser; Muhammad Imran Nisar; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Samuel O Oti; Andrea Pedroza; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Nobhojit Roy; Uchechukwu Sampson; Hyeyoung Seo; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Kenji Shibuya; Rahman Shiri; Ivy Shiue; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Vegard Skirbekk; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Lela Sturua; Bryan L Sykes; Martin Tobias; Bach X Tran; Leonardo Trasande; Hideaki Toyoshima; Steven van de Vijver; Tommi J Vasankari; J Lennert Veerman; Gustavo Velasquez-Melendez; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Theo Vos; Claire Wang; XiaoRong Wang; Elisabete Weiderpass; Andrea Werdecker; Jonathan L Wright; Y Claire Yang; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Jihyun Yoon; Seok-Jun Yoon; Yong Zhao; Maigeng Zhou; Shankuan Zhu; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Emmanuela Gakidou Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 79.321