Literature DB >> 29260125

Comparison of the reliability and efficacy of LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy and a conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the surgical treatment of grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids.

Mustafa Celalettin Haksal1, Ali Çiftci2, Çağrı Tiryaki2, Murat Burç Yazıcıoğlu2, Mehmet Özyıldız2, Selim Yiğit Yıldız2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of LigaSure-assisted hemorrhoidectomy and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy as a conventional method in our clinic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent LigaSure-assisted hemorrhoidectomy or conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids in our clinic between 2009 and 2014 were included in this study. The patient data were reviewed by screening records. Gender, age, preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, operation time, presence of thrombosis, number of packages, hospitalization time, early and late postoperative complications, prolonged pain presence, and follow-up period were recorded.
RESULTS: In this period, surgical interventions were performed on 365 patients diagnosed with hemorrhoids. Among these, 159 underwent LigaSure-assisted operations, while 206 were operated on by conventional methods. One hundred forty-four (39.5%) cases were female, while 221 (60.5%) cases were male. The median age of the patients was 40 (19-82) years in the LigaSure group and 41 (16-78) years in the conventional method group. The operation time was 15 (4-60) min in the LigaSure group and 20 (6-40) min in the conventional method group. Postoperative analgesics were given to the 182 (88.3%) cases in the conventional group and 107 (67.3%) cases in the LigaSure group. The time required for returning to normal daily activity was 6 (1-15) days in the LigaSure group and 7 (1-30) days in the conventional method group.
CONCLUSION: In this study, LigaSure was determined to be superior to a conventional method in terms of operation time, hospitalization period, postoperative analgesic requirements, time required for returning to normal daily activity, and postoperative bleeding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemorrhoids; LigaSure; hemorrhoidectomy; milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy

Year:  2017        PMID: 29260125      PMCID: PMC5731556          DOI: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Surg        ISSN: 2564-6850


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of Ligasure Hemorrhoidectomy with Conventional Ferguson's Hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Rahul Khanna; Seema Khanna; Shilpi Bhadani; Sanjay Singh; Ajay K Khanna
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  A randomized clinical trial comparing Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Nuhi Arslani; Leonardo Patrlj; Zoran Rajković; Dino Papeš; Silvio Altarac
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing.

Authors:  J S Kennedy; P L Stranahan; K D Taylor; J G Chandler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Prospective randomized trial of submucosal hemorrhoidectomy with radiofrequency bistoury vs. conventional Parks' operation.

Authors:  V Filingeri; G Gravante; E Baldessari; M Grimaldi; C U Casciani
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  G Milito; F Cadeddu; M G Muzi; C Nigro; A M Farinon
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Clinical experience of sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure.

Authors:  Yuan-Chang Chung; Hue-Jean Wu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Randomized controlled trial of LigaSure with submucosal dissection versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Jaw-Yuan Wang; Chien-Yu Lu; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Fang-Ming Chen; Che-Jen Huang; Yu-Sheng Huang; Tsung-Jen Huang; Jan-Sing Hsieh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure for haemorrhoids.

Authors:  M Y Mastakov; P G Buettner; Y-H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Randomized clinical trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  K-Y Tan; T Zin; H-L Sim; P-L Poon; A Cheng; K Mak
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Comparison of vessel sealing systems with conventional.

Authors:  Kemal Peker; Abdullah Inal; Huriye Güllü; Düriye Gül; Murat Sahin; Ayca Dumanli Ozcan; Kemal Kılıç
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 0.611

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  An update on surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bianca Aibuedefe; Sarah M Kling; Matthew M Philp; Howard M Ross; Juan Lucas Poggio
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.