| Literature DB >> 29259209 |
Wei-Ming Huang1,2, Hao-Min Cheng3,2, Chi-Jung Huang3,2, Chao-Yu Guo4, Dai-Yin Lu1,2, Ching-Wei Lee1,2, Pai-Feng Hsu1,2,4, Wen-Chung Yu1,2, Chen-Huan Chen1,2,4, Shih-Hsien Sung5,6,7.
Abstract
Hemographic indices have been associated with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. We therefore investigated the prognostic values of hemographic indices in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). Patients hospitalized primarily for AHF were drawn from an intramural registry. Hemographic indices, including white blood cell counts, neutrophil counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, reciprocal of lymphocyte (RL) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio were recorded. Among a total of 1923 participants (mean age 76 ± 12 years, 68% men), 875 patients died during a mean follow-up of 28.6 ± 20.7 months. Except for white blood cell counts, all the other hemographic indices were related to mortality, independently. In a forward stepwise Cox regression analysis among hemographic indices, RL was the strongest predictor (HR and 95% CI per-1SD:1.166,1.097-1.240) for mortality, after accounting for confounders. However, conditioned on the survivals, the hemographic indices were independently related to mortality within 3 years of follow-up, rather than beyond. Hemographic indices were independent risk factors of mortality in patients hospitalized for AHF, especially in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function. As an acute presentation of inflammation, hemographic indices might be useful to identify subjects at risk of mortality soon after the index hospitalization.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29259209 PMCID: PMC5736628 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17754-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics of the study population.
| Survived, n = 1048 | Mortality, n = 875 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 74.8 ± 13.9 | 78.3 ± 10.7 | <0.01 |
|
| 697(66.6) | 610(69.7) | 0.14 |
|
| 103.1 ± 21.9 | 99.0 ± 21.6 | <0.01 |
|
| 229 (21.9) | 175 (20.0) | 0.34 |
|
| 381(36.5) | 379(43.3) | <0.01 |
|
| |||
| Hypertension | 651(62.1) | 501(57.3) | 0.03 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 384(36.6) | 339(38.7) | 0.34 |
| Coronary artery disease | 364(34.7) | 314(35.9) | 0.60 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 321(30.6) | 244(27.9) | 0.19 |
| Stroke | 96(9.2) | 74(8.5) | 0.59 |
|
| |||
| LVEF (%) | 55.4 ± 20.0 | 53.4 ± 20.7 | 0.03 |
| LV mass (gm) | 282.9 ± 113.5 | 284.0 ± 105.9 | 0.82 |
| E/A ratio | 1.05 ± 0.66 | 1.15 ± 0.82 | 0.10 |
| Septal E/E’ | 17.4 ± 8.0 | 18.3 ± 7.8 | 0.16 |
|
| |||
| *WBC count (/mm3) | 6924.68 ± 1.41 | 7156.48 ± 1.47 | 0.051 |
| *Neutrophil count (/mm3) | 4602.56 ± 1.57 | 5006.10 ± 1.64 | <0.01 |
| *Lymphocyte count (/mm3) | 1269.69 ± 1.63 | 1077.20 ± 1.68 | <0.01 |
| Reciprocal of Lymphocyte | 6.45 ± 5.63 | 8.07 ± 7.07 | <0.01 |
| Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio | 4.76 ± 5.35 | 6.26 ± 6.80 | <0.01 |
| Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (k/mm3) | 173.1 ± 120.9 | 207.0 ± 246.7 | <0.01 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 12.13 ± 2.33 | 11.57 ± 2.11 | <0.01 |
| Platelet count (k/mm3) | 203.8 ± 92.8 | 201.4 ± 92.1 | 0.57 |
|
| |||
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.78 ± 1.48 | 1.92 ± 1.27 | 0.03 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 56.0 ± 30.4 | 48.3 ± 27.6 | <0.01 |
| Sodium (mEq/L) | 138.9 ± 4.2 | 138.6 ± 5.3 | 0.15 |
| Potassium (mEq/L) | 4.10 ± 0.73 | 4.11 ± 0.71 | 0.78 |
| *NT-proBNP (pg/ml), n = 646 | 4818.3 ± 3.6 | 8395.1 ± 3.5 | <0.01 |
|
| |||
| Antiplatelet | 715(71.7) | 623(71.2) | 0.82 |
| Beta-blocker | 727(69.4) | 494(56.5) | <0.01 |
| RAS blockade | 905(86.4) | 699(79.9) | <0.01 |
| Spironolactone | 628(59.9) | 467(53.4) | <0.01 |
*Geometric means and standard deviation.
E/A ratio: ratio of the early (E) to late (A) ventricular filling velocities; E/e′: ratio of early ventricular filling velocity (E) to early diastolic tissue velocity mitral annulus; EF: ejection fraction; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; LV: left ventricular; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; RAS blockade: renin-angiotensin system blockade; WBC: white blood cells
Predictors of 5-year mortality identified by uni- and multi-variable Cox regression analysis.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| P |
|
| |
| *While blood cell count, 1 SD = 1.44/mm3 | 1.055 (0.985–1.130) | 0.12 | — | — | — | — |
| *Neutrophil count, 1 SD = 1.60 /mm3 | 1.141 (1.066–1.222) | <0.01 | 1.133 (1.041–1.234) | <0.01 | 1.189 (1.023–1.383) | 0.02 |
| Reciprocal of Lymphocyte, 1 SD = 6.3 | 1.162 (1.115–1.211) | <0.01 | 1.165 (1.096–1.239) | <0.01 | 1.141 (1.017–1.280) | 0.03 |
| Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, 1 SD = 6.1 | 1.160 (1.112–1.210) | <0.01 | 1.162 (1.094–1.235) | <0.01 | 1.137 (1.015–1.274) | 0.03 |
| Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, 1 SD = 189.5 k/mm3 | 1.090 (1.052–1.129) | <0.01 | 1.161 (1.041–1.295) | <0.01 | 1.244 (1.033–1.498) | 0.02 |
Model 1: crude ratio.
Model 2: Adjust age, sex, mean blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, sodium and hemoglobin levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and use of renin-angiotensin system blockade, beta-blockade and spironolactone.
Model 3: Adjust variables in Model 1 PLUS N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).
*Log transformation of while blood cell count and neutrophil count.
Figure 1The Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis of the study population, according to the tertiles of the levels of white blood cell count (A), neutrophil count (B), reciprocal of lymphocyte count (C), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (D), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (E) in the study population.
Figure 2Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of per-1SD increase of reciprocal of lymphocyte count for mortality, after accounting for age and sex, were demonstrated in subgroups of age, gender, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, phenotypes of heart failure and de novo heart failure.
Figure 3Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of per-1SD increase of neutrophil count with log transformation, reciprocal of Lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for mortality in specific follow-up periods, after accounting for age and sex.
The associations of mortality and reciprocal of lymphocytes during the follow-up time slots.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| 17.2 | 1 | < | 1 | < |
|
| 21.2 | 1.23 (0.94–1.62) | 1.02 (0.72–1.44) | ||
|
| 39.5 | 2.29 (1.80–2.93) | 2.01 (1.47–2.73) | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 11.2 | 1 | < | 1 |
|
|
| 19.3 | 1.72 (1.30–2.28) | 1.51 (1.09–2.11) | ||
|
| 21.4 | 1.91 (1.44–2.52) | 1.40 (1.00–1.96) | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 8.6 | 1 |
| 1 |
|
|
| 15.4 | 1.78 (1.15–2.78) | 1.30 (0.75–2.26) | ||
|
| 13.1 | 1.53 (0.95–2.44) | 0.84 (0.46–1.55) | ||
RL: reciprocal of lymphocytes; RL tertiles 1 was with the lowest RL levels; CI: confidence interval; RR: rate ratio; *Adjust for age, sex, mean blood pressure, LVEF, hemoglobin, eGFR, sodium, and prescribed medications.