Literature DB >> 29259039

Both invasiveness and proliferation criteria predict recurrence of non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas after surgery: a retrospective analysis of a monocentric cohort of 120 patients.

Julie Lelotte1, Anne Mourin2, Edward Fomekong3, Alex Michotte4, Christian Raftopoulos3, Dominique Maiter5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Additional robust criteria to predict early postoperative recurrence of non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMAs) are needed. Recently, a new classification of pituitary tumors has been proposed, which is based on both radiological and histological criteria and allows the grading into 5 groups of different potential aggressiveness. The aim of this study was to use this classification to further characterize predictive factors of recurrence in an independent series of NFMA. CASES AND METHODS: 120 patients operated for a NFMA were analyzed retrospectively. For each of them, the invasion of the cavernous and/or sphenoidal sinuses by the tumor was studied on the preoperative MRI and the proliferative character was based on precise histological and immunohistological examination.
RESULTS: 26% (n = 31) of the adenomas were proliferative and 57% (n = 68) were invasive. The invasive lesions were larger (P < 0.001) and their removal was complete in only 82% of the cases. The distribution of NFMAs was as follows: 32% grade 1a, 11% (proliferative) grade 1b, 42% (invasive) grade 2a and 15% (proliferative and invasive) grade 2b. Their probability of recurrence at 5 years was 20, 39, 44 and 66%, respectively. A young age, the atypical character and the presence of postoperative residual tumor were all independent risk factors of recurrence (P < 0.025). DISCUSSION: The new clinicopathological classification proves to be very useful in predicting the risk of recurrence of non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas after a first surgery. In particular, grade 2b lesions showed an overall likelihood of recurrence that was 8.6 times greater than those of grade 1a.
© 2018 European Society of Endocrinology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29259039     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-17-0965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  16 in total

1.  Predicting early post-operative remission in pituitary adenomas: evaluation of the modified knosp classification.

Authors:  Marie Buchy; Véronique Lapras; Muriel Rabilloud; Alexandre Vasiljevic; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Gérald Raverot
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas: factors affecting postoperative recurrence, and pre- and post-surgical endocrine and visual function.

Authors:  Venkatram Subramanian; Rachel Su Min Lee; Simon Howell; Samuel Gregson; Ian M Lahart; Kalpana Kaushal; Joseph M Pappachan
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Predictive modeling for pituitary adenomas: single center experience in 501 consecutive patients.

Authors:  A L Pappy; A Savinkina; C Bicknese; S Neill; N M Oyesiku; A G Ioachimescu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  Aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas.

Authors:  Gérald Raverot; Mirela Diana Ilie; Hélène Lasolle; Vincent Amodru; Jacqueline Trouillas; Frédéric Castinetti; Thierry Brue
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 5.  Aggressive nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Sérgio Portovedo; Leonardo Vieira Neto; Christina Maeda Takiya; Leandro Miranda-Alves; Paula Soares; Denise Pires de Carvalho
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Identification and Verification of SLC27A1, PTBP1 and EIF5A With Significantly Altered Expression in Aggressive Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Jianhua Cheng; Ruya Sun; Ding Nie; Bin Li; Song Bai Gui; Chu Zhong Li; Ya Zhuo Zhang; Peng Zhao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

7.  Nomogram predictive model of post-operative recurrence in non-functioning pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Wen Lyu; Xu Fei; Cheng Chen; Yuqun Tang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-02

8.  Post-operative volumes following endoscopic surgery for non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas are predictive of further intervention, but not endocrine outcomes.

Authors:  K Seejore; S A Alavi; S M Pearson; J M W Robins; B Alromhain; A Sheikh; P Nix; T Wilson; S M Orme; A Tyagi; N Phillips; R D Murray
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.763

Review 9.  Aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: current practices, controversies, and perspectives, on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  Sam Ng; Mahmoud Messerer; Julien Engelhardt; Michaël Bruneau; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Giulia Cossu; Sebastien Froelich; Torstein R Meling; Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Henry W S Schroeder; Marcos Tatagiba; Idoya Zazpe; Moncef Berhouma; Roy T Daniel; Edward R Laws; Engelbert Knosp; Michael Buchfelder; Henri Dufour; Stéphane Gaillard; Timothée Jacquesson; Emmanuel Jouanneau
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 2.816

10.  Phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR T693) as a Novel Predictor of Recurrence in Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Ashutosh Rai; Liza Das; Kanchan K Mukherjee; Sivashanmugam Dhandapani; Manjul Tripathi; Chirag Kamal Ahuja; Bishan Dass Radotra; Pinaki Dutta
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.