Literature DB >> 29258946

Differential Tumor Progression Patterns in Skull Base Versus Non-Skull Base Meningiomas: A Critical Analysis from a Long-Term Follow-Up Study and Review of Literature.

Amey R Savardekar1, Devi Prasad Patra1, Shyamal Bir1, Jai Deep Thakur1, Nasser Mohammed1, Papireddy Bollam1, Maria-Magdalena Georgescu2, Anil Nanda3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze the differences in tumor progression patterns and histopathologic characteristics between skull base meningiomas (SBMs) and non-skull base meningiomas (NSBMs).
METHODS: Retrospective data of 382 patients with SBMs and 200 patients with NSBMs who underwent primary microsurgical resection between January 1995 and December 2016 were analyzed. Data related to clinical history, neuroimaging, surgical technique, and follow-up were reviewed. A separate prospective cohort of 78 meningiomas operated on from June 2016 to July 2017 was analyzed (World Health Organization [WHO] grade and Ki-67 proliferation index) for biologic comparison.
RESULTS: Skull base location, WHO grade II tumor, and subtotal resection were independent predictors of unfavorable outcome. The overall tumor progression rate in the SBM group (33%) was higher than in the NSBM group (19.7%) (P = 0.006) (mean follow-up period, 51 months). The 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 78%, 60%, and 45% in the SBM group, whereas it was 90%, 80%, and 53% in the NSBM group, respectively. Interestingly, there was no difference in the median PFS after 10 years of follow-up (SBMs 210 months vs. NSBM 212 months, P = 0.93). In the prospective cohort of 78 meningiomas, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of WHO grade I tumors and in the mean Ki-67 index of WHO grade I meningiomas between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: There is a divergent tumor progression pattern for surgically treated SBMs vis-à-vis NSBMs. Differences in tumor biology and the proportion of Simpson grade I resections are likely attributable factors.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracranial meningioma; Long-term follow-up; Meningioma surgery; Non–skull base meningiomas; Progression-free survival; Recurrence; Skull base meningiomas; Tumor progression rate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29258946     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  20 in total

1.  Meningiomas: skull base versus non-skull base.

Authors:  Torstein R Meling; Michele Da Broi; David Scheie; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  WHO grade I meningiomas: classification-tree for prognostic factors of survival.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Lemée; Holger Joswig; Michele Da Broi; Marco Vincenzo Corniola; David Scheie; Karl Schaller; Eirik Helseth; Torstein R Meling
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Value of K i -67 Labeling Index in Predicting Recurrence of WHO Grade I Cranial Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Jose Gabrielle Matias; Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Brendan Martin; Ankush Bajaj; Ewa Borys; Edward Melian; Kevin Barton; Douglas E Anderson; Vikram C Prabhu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-09-06

4.  Case Series of Skull Base Meningioma Resection in the Octogenarian Population.

Authors:  Dorian M Kusyk; Gordon Mao; Rocco Dabecco; Alexander K Yu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-02-18

5.  Residual Tumor Volume and Tumor Progression after Subtotal Resection and Observation of WHO Grade I Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Colin J Przybylowski; Benjamin K Hendricks; Charuta G Furey; Joseph D DiDomenico; Randall W Porter; Nader Sanai; Kaith K Almefty; Andrew S Little
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-09-09

6.  Activity of PD-1 blockade with nivolumab among patients with recurrent atypical/anaplastic meningioma: phase II trial results.

Authors:  Wenya Linda Bi; Lakshmi Nayak; David M Meredith; Joseph Driver; Ziming Du; Samantha Hoffman; Yvonne Li; Eudocia Quant Lee; Rameen Beroukhim; Mikael Rinne; Ricardo McFaline-Figueroa; Ugonma Chukwueke; Christine McCluskey; Sarah Gaffey; Andrew D Cherniack; Jennifer Stefanik; Lisa Doherty; Christina Taubert; Meghan Cifrino; Deborah LaFrankie; Thomas Graillon; Patrick Y Wen; Keith L Ligon; Ossama Al-Mefty; Raymond Y Huang; Alona Muzikansky; E Antonio Chiocca; Sandro Santagata; Ian F Dunn; David A Reardon
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Pre-operative MRI Radiomics for the Prediction of Progression and Recurrence in Meningiomas.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Ko; Yang Zhang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Kai-Ting Chang; Tai-Yuan Chen; Sher-Wei Lim; Te-Chang Wu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Genetic and histologic spatiotemporal evolution of recurrent, multifocal, multicentric and metastatic glioblastoma.

Authors:  Maria-Magdalena Georgescu; Adriana Olar
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 7.801

9.  Radiomics approach for prediction of recurrence in skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Tai-Yuan Chen; Sher-Wei Lim; Te-Chang Wu; Yu-Ting Kuo; Ching-Chung Ko; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Long-Term Clinical Outcome of First Recurrence Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Yuki Kuranari; Ryota Tamura; Noboru Tsuda; Kenzo Kosugi; Yukina Morimoto; Kazunari Yoshida; Masahiro Toda
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.