Literature DB >> 29258944

Management of Isolated Atlas Fractures: A Retrospective Study of 65 Patients.

Hyun Su Kim1, Michael Brendan Cloney1, Tyler R Koski1, Zachary A Smith1, Nader S Dahdaleh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Jefferson fractures, or burst fractures of the C1 vertebra, can be managed surgically or conservatively, depending on their stability.
METHODS: We identified all patients who were treated for a C1 fracture at our institution between 1999 and 2016 for retrospective analysis. Patients with any other concurrent cervical fractures or nontraumatic etiology of fracture were excluded. Stability was defined as either lateral mass displacement ≥7 mm on computed tomography or presence of transverse atlantal ligament disruption on magnetic resonance imaging. We collected data on patients' demographic, clinical, and radiographic presentation and identified variables independently associated with instability at presentation and failure to achieve fusion at follow-up.
RESULTS: We identified 65 patients. On multivariable regression, instability at presentation was independently associated with atlantodens interval (odds ratio [OR] 2.357, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.0629-1.271], P = 0.099) and type 3 fracture (OR 6.081, 95% CI [1.068-34.612], P = 0.042). Failure to achieve fusion was independently associated with age (OR 1.226, 95% CI [1.007-1.495], P = 0.043), motor vehicle collision as mechanism of injury (OR 22834.3, 95% CI [3.135-1.66e8], P = 0.027), and type 2 fracture (OR 168.537, 95% CI [1.743-16292.92], P = 0.028). Type 3 fracture was positively associated with halo vest for management (OR 17.171, 95% CI [2.882-102.289], P = 0.002) and negatively associated with a rigid cervical collar for management (OR 0.0616, 95% CI [0.0104-0.3653], P = 0.002). All 4 patients who underwent surgery presented with unstable fracture (P = 0.0187).
CONCLUSIONS: Atlantodens interval, mechanism of injury, and fracture type affect Jefferson fracture management decisions and outcomes, including instability at presentation and fusion at follow-up. Most fractures were managed nonsurgically regardless of stability.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atlas; C1; Fracture; Jefferson fracture; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29258944     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of isolated C1 fractures: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kyle Samuel Chan; Nathan A Shlobin; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

2.  The relationship between radiologic parameters and transverse atlantal ligament injury obtained from MRI scans in patients with an isolated atlas burst fracture: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jongpil Eun; Youngmin Oh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative treatment for unilateral sagittal split fractures of C1 lateral mass.

Authors:  Whoan Jeang Kim; Jong-Beom Park; Heui-Jeon Park; Kyung-Jin Song; Woo-Kie Min
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Motion-preserving treatment of unstable atlas fracture: transoral anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis using a laminoplasty plate.

Authors:  Xiaobao Zou; Beiping Ouyang; Binbin Wang; Haozhi Yang; Su Ge; Yuyue Chen; Ling Ni; Shuang Zhang; Hong Xia; Zenghui Wu; Xiangyang Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.