Literature DB >> 29258933

Comparison of Single-Level and Multilevel Decompressive Laminectomy for Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Utku Adilay1, Bülent Guclu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify whether multiple compressions of nerve roots resulted in poorer surgical outcome when patients were treated with single-level decompressive laminectomy or multilevel decompressive laminectomy. To reach this we compared preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and walking duration of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients treated with single-level and multilevel decompressive laminectomy.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 112 consecutive patients undergoing lumbar decompressive surgery without arthrodesis for LSS between March 2010 and September 2013. Forty-eight patients were treated with single-level laminectomy and 64 patients were treated with multilevel laminectomy. ODI scores, VAS scores, and walking duration were measured for all patients preoperatively and 30 months after decompressive surgery.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64.41 ± 13.4 years. The ODI scores, VAS scores, and walking duration difference between patients treated with single-level laminectomy and multilevel laminectomy were statistically significant and higher for the first group (P < 0.05). There were more operative complications in patients treated with multilevel decompressive laminectomy; however, there was no statistically significant difference between single-level and multilevel decompressed patients regarding complications (P = 0.119). Four of the patients treated with multilevel decompressive laminectomy experienced postoperative spondylolisthesis needing posterior instrumented fusion.
CONCLUSION: Recovery in terms of ODI scores, VAS scores, and walking duration was better in LSS patients undergoing single-level laminectomy than in those undergoing multilevel laminectomy. Also, the rates of operative complications and postoperative follow-up spondylolisthesis were higher in patients treated with multilevel laminectomy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laminectomy; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Spinal stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29258933     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

1.  Patients Undergoing 3-Level-or-Greater Decompression-Only Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Have Similar Outcomes to Those Undergoing Single-Level Surgery at 2 Years.

Authors:  Michael T Nolte; Philip K Louie; Bryce A Basques; Arya G Varthi; Justin C Paul; Krishn Khanna; Tarush Khurana; Arshan Chaudhri; Dino Samartzis; Edward J Goldberg; Howard S An
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 2.  An Algorithmic Approach to Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Evidenced-Based Approach.

Authors:  Sudhir Diwan; Dawood Sayed; Timothy R Deer; Amber Salomons; Kevin Liang
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 3.  A Review of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication: Disease and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Timothy Deer; Dawood Sayed; John Michels; Youssef Josephson; Sean Li; Aaron K Calodney
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Lumbar Pedicular Stress Fracture Post-laminectomy: a Case Report.

Authors:  Noémie Ampe; P Meersman; D Ghysen; B Kegelaers; C Gorris; J Debeuf; P Van Wambeke; M Schreurs
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.