| Literature DB >> 29258171 |
Javier Fernández-Catalá1, Laura Cano-Casanova2, María Ángeles Lillo-Ródenas3, Ángel Berenguer-Murcia4, Diego Cazorla-Amorós5.
Abstract
The elimination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at low concentration is a subject of great interest because these compounds are very harmful for the environment and human health. In this work, we have developed a synthesis methodology of TiO₂ that allows obtaining meso-macroporous materials with hierarchical porosity and with high thermal stability for their application as photocatalysts in the removal of VOCs, specifically propene. The materials synthesized in this work were characterized by Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TG), and nitrogen adsorption. It is observed that the samples calcined at 250 °C and 500 °C present a high photoactivity for the photooxidation of propene, which is similar to the benchmark material P25 (commercial TiO₂). Moreover, the textural properties are better than those for P25, indicating that the samples are interesting for the preparation of photocatalysts with different conformations, such as in the form of coatings and fillings in different size scales.Entities:
Keywords: TiO2; hierarchical porosity; photocatalytic activity; propene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29258171 PMCID: PMC6149674 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22122243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1XRD patterns of TiO2 samples. Key: A = anatase; R = rutile.
Crystallite size and phase composition of the TiO2 samples prepared in this study (see Sample Characterization (Section 3.3) for full details).
| Samples | Crystal Phase Composition | Crystallite Size (nm) |
|---|---|---|
| TiO2_AS | 100% Anatase | 6 |
| TiO2_W | 100% Anatase | 7 |
| TiO2_250 | 100% Anatase | 7 |
| TiO2_500 | 100% Anatase | 13 |
| TiO2_700 | 100% Anatase | 26 |
| TiO2_900 | 100% Rutile | 48 |
Figure 2TG curves of the TiO2 samples prepared in this study.
Figure 3FTIR spectra of the TiO2 samples prepared in this study.
Figure 4UV–VIS absorption spectra of the TiO2 prepared samples.
Absorption edge wavelengths (nm), band gap (Eg) and crystal phase composition values of the TiO2 samples prepared in this study. The data for benchmark material P25 are shown for comparison purposes. Key: A = anatase; R = rutile.
| Samples | λ (nm) | Eg (Ev) | Crystal Phase Composition |
|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2_AS | 391 | 3.17 | 100% A |
| TiO2_W | 377 | 3.29 | 100% A |
| TiO2_250 | 390 | 3.17 | 100% A |
| TiO2_500 | 383 | 3.23 | 100% A |
| TiO2_700 | 381 | 3.25 | 100% A |
| TiO2_900 | 414 | 2.99 | 100% R |
| P25 | 409 | 3.03 | 80% A + 20% R |
Figure 5Isotherms of N2 at 77 K for the different TiO2 samples prepared in this study. The adsorption isotherm of the benchmark material P25 is also shown for comparison purposes.
Textural properties of the TiO2 samples prepared in this study derived from the analysis of the N2 adsorption isotherms. The data for benchmark material P25 are shown for comparison purposes.
| Samples | SBET (m2/g) | Vtotal,0.95 (cm3/g) | VN2DR (cm3/g) | Mean Pore Size (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2_AS | 96 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 6.2 |
| TiO2_W | 201 | 0.43 | 0.07 | 8.8 |
| TiO2_250 | 212 | 0.42 | 0.08 | 6.2 |
| TiO2_500 | 85 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 8.7 |
| TiO2_700 | 7 | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| TiO2_900 | 4 | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| P25 | 55 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 7.6 |
Figure 6SEM of the different TiO2 samples prepared in this study. Scale bar: 1 μm.
Figure 7TEM of the different TiO2 samples prepared in this study. Insets: higher magnification images for all samples. Scale bar for all images except TiO2_900: 20 nm; Scale bar for sample TiO2_900: 0.2 μm. Scale bars for insets: 5 nm.
Crystalline size with TEM and XRD of TiO2 samples. The mean crystallite size from TEM analysis was performed by counting 100 separate particles (unless stated otherwise) and averaging the results.
| Samples | Crystallite Size (nm) “TEM” | Crystallite Size (nm) “XRD” |
|---|---|---|
| TiO2_AS | 6.4 ± 1.0 | 6 |
| TiO2_W | 7.1 ± 0.9 | 7 |
| TiO2_250 | 7.2 ± 0.9 | 7 |
| TiO2_500 | 12.9 ± 1.5 | 13 |
| TiO2_700 | 80 ± 20 (50 part.) | 26 |
| TiO2_900 | 270 ± 90 (30 part.) | 48 |
Figure 8In situ XRD patterns at different temperatures of TiO2 samples.
Phase composition and crystallite size of TiO2 samples obtained in XRD in situ at different temperatures and dwelling times. A = anatase; R = rutile.
| Samples | Phase Composition | Anatase Crystallite Size (nm) |
|---|---|---|
| TiO2_AS_0 min | A (100%) | 7 |
| TiO2_250_0 min | A (100%) | 7 |
| TiO2_250_30 min | A (100%) | 7 |
| TiO2_250_60 min | A (100%) | 7 |
| TiO2_500_0 min | A (100%) | 11 |
| TiO2_500_30 min | A (100%) | 13 |
| TiO2_500_60 min | A (100%) | 14 |
| TiO2_700_0 min | A (100%) | 31 |
| TiO2_700_30 min | A (100%) | 33 |
| TiO2_700_60 min | A (100%) | 34 |
| TiO2_900_0 min | A (75%) + R (25%) | 48 |
| TiO2_900_30 min | A (35%) + R (65%) | 49 |
| TiO2_900_60 min | A (3%) + R (97%) | 51 |
Figure 9Conversion of propene for TiO2 samples and P25.