INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used in the resection of superficial esophageal cancers. Since its use has been extended to cases involving large esophageal tumors occupying nearly the whole or the whole circumference of the lumen, the occurrence of esophageal stricture has increased. Although endoscopic injection of triamcinolone (TA) is widely used for the prevention of postoperative stricture, a significant number of patients still develop stricture after TA injection therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to identify the clinical parameters that predispose post-ESD patients to esophageal stricture after TA injection therapy. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients who were diagnosed with superficial esophageal cancer and subsequently underwent ESD were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, 53 patients and 57 lesions bearing mucosal defects covering greater than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference after ESD were treated with TA injection therapy. The rate of esophageal stricture was found to be highest in cases involving mucosal defects that covered more than seven-eighths of the circumference. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic TA injection is not sufficient for preventing esophageal stricture in patients bearing mucosal defects covering more than seven-eighths of the esophageal circumference after ESD.
INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used in the resection of superficial esophageal cancers. Since its use has been extended to cases involving large esophageal tumors occupying nearly the whole or the whole circumference of the lumen, the occurrence of esophageal stricture has increased. Although endoscopic injection of triamcinolone (TA) is widely used for the prevention of postoperative stricture, a significant number of patients still develop stricture after TA injection therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to identify the clinical parameters that predispose post-ESD patients to esophageal stricture after TA injection therapy. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients who were diagnosed with superficial esophageal cancer and subsequently underwent ESD were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, 53 patients and 57 lesions bearing mucosal defects covering greater than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference after ESD were treated with TA injection therapy. The rate of esophageal stricture was found to be highest in cases involving mucosal defects that covered more than seven-eighths of the circumference. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic TA injection is not sufficient for preventing esophageal stricture in patients bearing mucosal defects covering more than seven-eighths of the esophageal circumference after ESD.