Eric Rubenstein1, Julie Daniels1, Laura A Schieve2, Deborah L Christensen2, Kim Van Naarden Braun2, Catherine E Rice3,4, Amanda V Bakian5, Maureen S Durkin6, Steven A Rosenberg7, Russell S Kirby8, Li-Ching Lee9. 1. 1 Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2. 2 National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. 3 Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. 4 Emory Autism Center, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. 5 Division of Child Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 6. 6 Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 7. 7 Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 8. 8 Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. 9. 9 Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although data on publicly available special education are informative and offer a glimpse of trends in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and use of educational services, using these data for population-based public health monitoring has drawbacks. Our objective was to evaluate trends in special education eligibility among 8-year-old children with ASD identified in the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. METHODS: We used data from 5 Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network sites (Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, and North Carolina) during 4 surveillance years (2002, 2006, 2008, and 2010) and compared trends in 12 categories of special education eligibility by sex and race/ethnicity. We used multivariable linear risk regressions to evaluate how the proportion of children with a given eligibility changed over time. RESULTS: Of 6010 children with ASD, more than 36% did not receive an autism eligibility in special education in each surveillance year. From surveillance year 2002 to surveillance year 2010, autism eligibility increased by 3.6 percentage points ( P = .09), and intellectual disability eligibility decreased by 4.6 percentage points ( P < .001). A greater proportion of boys than girls had an autism eligibility in 2002 (56.3% vs 48.8%). Compared with other racial/ethnic groups, Hispanic children had the largest increase in proportion with autism eligibility from 2002 to 2010 (15.4%, P = .005) and the largest decrease in proportion with intellectual disability (-14.3%, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Although most children with ASD had autism eligibility, many received special education services under other categories, and racial/ethnic disparities persisted. To monitor trends in ASD prevalence, public health officials need access to comprehensive data collected systematically, not just special education eligibility.
OBJECTIVE: Although data on publicly available special education are informative and offer a glimpse of trends in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and use of educational services, using these data for population-based public health monitoring has drawbacks. Our objective was to evaluate trends in special education eligibility among 8-year-old children with ASD identified in the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. METHODS: We used data from 5 Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network sites (Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, and North Carolina) during 4 surveillance years (2002, 2006, 2008, and 2010) and compared trends in 12 categories of special education eligibility by sex and race/ethnicity. We used multivariable linear risk regressions to evaluate how the proportion of children with a given eligibility changed over time. RESULTS: Of 6010 children with ASD, more than 36% did not receive an autism eligibility in special education in each surveillance year. From surveillance year 2002 to surveillance year 2010, autism eligibility increased by 3.6 percentage points ( P = .09), and intellectual disability eligibility decreased by 4.6 percentage points ( P < .001). A greater proportion of boys than girls had an autism eligibility in 2002 (56.3% vs 48.8%). Compared with other racial/ethnic groups, Hispanic children had the largest increase in proportion with autism eligibility from 2002 to 2010 (15.4%, P = .005) and the largest decrease in proportion with intellectual disability (-14.3%, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Although most children with ASD had autism eligibility, many received special education services under other categories, and racial/ethnic disparities persisted. To monitor trends in ASD prevalence, public health officials need access to comprehensive data collected systematically, not just special education eligibility.
Entities:
Keywords:
autism spectrum disorder; prevalence; special education; surveillance; trends
Authors: Ellen Giarelli; Lisa D Wiggins; Catherine E Rice; Susan E Levy; Russell S Kirby; Jennifer Pinto-Martin; David Mandell Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2009-11-08 Impact factor: 2.554
Authors: Stephen J Blumberg; Matthew D Bramlett; Michael D Kogan; Laura A Schieve; Jessica R Jones; Michael C Lu Journal: Natl Health Stat Report Date: 2013-03-20
Authors: Coleen A Boyle; Sheree Boulet; Laura A Schieve; Robin A Cohen; Stephen J Blumberg; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp; Susanna Visser; Michael D Kogan Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-05-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Deborah L Christensen; Jon Baio; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Deborah Bilder; Jane Charles; John N Constantino; Julie Daniels; Maureen S Durkin; Robert T Fitzgerald; Margaret Kurzius-Spencer; Li-Ching Lee; Sydney Pettygrove; Cordelia Robinson; Eldon Schulz; Chris Wells; Martha S Wingate; Walter Zahorodny; Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2016-04-01
Authors: Marco Solmi; Minjin Song; Dong Keon Yon; Seung Won Lee; Eric Fombonne; Min Seo Kim; Seoyeon Park; Min Ho Lee; Jimin Hwang; Roberto Keller; Ai Koyanagi; Louis Jacob; Elena Dragioti; Lee Smith; Christoph U Correll; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Giovanni Croatto; Andre F Carvalho; Jae Won Oh; San Lee; Corentin J Gosling; Keun-Ah Cheon; Dimitris Mavridis; Che-Sheng Chu; Chih-Sung Liang; Joaquim Radua; Laurent Boyer; Guillaume Fond; Jae Il Shin; Samuele Cortese Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Amy N Esler; Jeannette Sample; Jennifer Hall-Lande; Bryn Harris; Catherine Rice; Jenny Poynter; Russell S Kirby; Lisa Wiggins Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2022-02-25
Authors: Eric Rubenstein; Deborah B Ehrenthal; Jenna Nobles; David C Mallinson; Lauren Bishop; Marina C Jenkins; Hsiang-Hui Kuo; Maureen S Durkin Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 4.615