Literature DB >> 29257748

Utility of cone-beam computed tomography angiography for the assessment of vertebral artery dissection.

Kenji Fukuda1, Toshio Higashi2, Masakazu Okawa1, Juntaro Matsumoto1, Koichi Takano3, Tooru Inoue1.   

Abstract

Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) has been recognized as a cause of headache and stroke. Accurate evaluation of dissection using several modalities such as catheter-based angiography, CT angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for subsequent management. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare cone-beam computed tomography angiography (CBCT-A) with other image modalities for the evaluation of the detailed structures of VAD. Twenty-five consecutive cases identified as having VAD were included. They underwent catheter-based angiography (2D-digital subtraction angiography [DSA], 3D-DSA, and CBCT-A), CTA, and MRI for the diagnosis of VAD. CBCT-A was performed following conventional angiography. Dissecting lesions were evaluated for the presence of intimal flap/double lumen, wall thickening, and enhancement of outer wall. This study results showed that CBCT-A was the most superior modality to detect intimal flap/double lumen (found in 56% of the cases) due to its high spatial resolution. MRI was superior for the assessment of wall thickening as an intramural hematoma in 76% of the cases. However, wall thickening was detected in 44% of cases using CBCT-A. In 5 cases, enhancement of outer wall was identified only in CBCT-A. In conclusion, CBCT-A provides detailed luminal and wall morphology of VADs. CBCT-A is useful for the accurate diagnosis of VADs.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-beam computed tomography angiography; Enhancement of outer wall; Intimal flap/double lumen; Vertebral artery dissection; Wall thickening/intramural hematoma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29257748     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  1 in total

1.  A case of multiple Vertebrobasilar artery fenestration misdiagnosed as vertebral artery dissection.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Xiaokai Wang; Xiaohua Li; Huifeng Zheng; Zhiyong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.474

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.