Literature DB >> 29256983

Comparison of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy, PCR and Culture of Corneal Scrapes in the Diagnosis of Acanthamoeba Keratitis.

Joanne W Y Goh1, Rhys Harrison1, Scott Hau2, Claire L Alexander3, Derek M Tole1, Venkata S Avadhanam1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is an uncommon but serious corneal infection, in which delayed diagnosis carries a poor prognosis. Conventional culture requires a long incubation period and has low sensitivity. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) are available alternative diagnostic modalities that have increasing clinical utility. This study compares confocal microscopy, PCR, and corneal scrape culture in the early diagnosis of AK.
METHODS: We reviewed the case notes of patients with a differential diagnosis of AK between June 2016 and February 2017 at the Bristol Eye Hospital, United Kingdom. Clinical features at presentation, and results of IVCM, PCR, and corneal scrape cultures were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 25 case records were reviewed. AK was diagnosed in 14 patients (15 eyes). Based on the definition of "definite AK," the diagnostic sensitivities of IVCM, PCR, and corneal scrape cultures were 100% [95% confidence interval (CI), 63.1%-100%], 71.4% (95% CI, 41.9%-91.6%) and 33.3% (95% CI, 9.9%-65.1%), respectively. The 3 methods showed a specificity of 100% and a positive predictive value of 100%. Using a reference standard of only positive corneal cultures, IVCM, and PCR had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 29.2%-100%) and 75% (95% CI, 19.4%-99.4%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: All 3 diagnostic tests are highly specific, and a positive test result is highly predictive of disease presence. IVCM is both highly sensitive and specific when performed by an experienced operator. PCR is a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of AK because of its wider availability compared with IVCM, and it may be used in combination with IVCM for microbiologic confirmation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29256983     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  18 in total

Review 1.  The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: Global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Lawson Ung; Paulo J M Bispo; Swapna S Shanbhag; Michael S Gilmore; James Chodosh
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Comparison of culture, confocal microscopy and PCR in routine hospital use for microbial keratitis diagnosis.

Authors:  Jeremy J Hoffman; John K G Dart; Surjo K De; Nicole Carnt; Georgia Cleary; Scott Hau
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 3.  Post-keratoplasty Infectious Keratitis: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Management, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Anna Song; Rashmi Deshmukh; Haotian Lin; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta; James Chodosh; Dalia G Said; Harminder S Dua; Darren S J Ting
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-07

4.  Utility of investigation for suspected microbial keratitis: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Stephen Tuft; Catey Bunce; Surjo De; John Thomas
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  Deep learning-based automated diagnosis of fungal keratitis with in vivo confocal microscopy images.

Authors:  Jian Lv; Kai Zhang; Qing Chen; Qi Chen; Wei Huang; Ling Cui; Min Li; Jianyin Li; Lifei Chen; Chaolan Shen; Zhao Yang; Yixuan Bei; Lanjian Li; Xiaohang Wu; Siming Zeng; Fan Xu; Haotian Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 6.  Polymerase Chain Reaction and Its Application in the Diagnosis of Infectious Keratitis.

Authors:  Harry Y Liu; Grant C Hopping; Uma Vaidyanathan; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

Review 7.  Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Grant C Hopping; Uma Vaidyanathan; Harry Liu; Anisha N Somani; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

8.  Evaluation of Acanthamoeba keratitis cases in a tertiary medical care centre over 21 years.

Authors:  Wolfgang List; Wilfried Glatz; Regina Riedl; Georg Mossboeck; Gernot Steinwender; Andreas Wedrich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  A Review of Imaging Biomarkers of the Ocular Surface.

Authors:  William W Binotti; Betul Bayraktutar; M Cuneyt Ozmen; Stephanie M Cox; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.152

10.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Inhibitory Effect of Topical Ophthalmic Agents on Acanthamoeba Viability.

Authors:  Wayne Heaselgrave; Anas Hamad; Steven Coles; Scott Hau
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.