Literature DB >> 29256376

Evaluation of Best Practices for the Euthanasia of Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

Kathleen E Scott1, Lauren A Bracchi2, Mia T Lieberman1, Nichola J Hill1, Tyler J Caron1, Mary M Patterson3.   

Abstract

Although zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) have been used in biomedical research for many years, no published reports are available about euthanizing these small birds. In this study, we compared 5 methods for zebra finch euthanasia: sodium pentobarbital (NaP) given intracoelomically with physical restraint but no anesthesia; isoflurane anesthesia followed by intracoelomic injection of NaP; and CO2 asphyxiation at 20%, 40%, and 80% chamber displacement rates (percentage of chamber volume per minute). Birds undergoing euthanasia were videorecorded and scored by 2 observers for behaviors potentially related to discomfort or distress. Time to recumbency and time until respiratory arrest (RA) were also assessed. RA was achieved faster by using NaP in a conscious bird compared to using isoflurane anesthesia followed by NaP; however, neither method caused behaviors that might affect animal welfare, such as open-mouth breathing, to any appreciable extent. Among the CO2 treatment groups, there was an inverse correlation between the chamber displacement rate used and the duration of open-mouth breathing, onset of head retroflexion, and time to RA. The results demonstrate that the intracoelomic administration of NaP in an awake, restrained zebra finch is a rapid and effective method of euthanasia. If CO2 is used to euthanize these birds, a high displacement rate (for example, 80%) will minimize the duration of the procedure and associated behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29256376      PMCID: PMC5710160     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  9 in total

1.  Recommendations for euthanasia of experimental animals: Part 2. DGXT of the European Commission.

Authors:  B Close; K Banister; V Baumans; E M Bernoth; N Bromage; J Bunyan; W Erhardt; P Flecknell; N Gregory; H Hackbarth; D Morton; C Warwick
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  The effect of light level, CO2 flow rate, and anesthesia on the stress response of mice during CO2 euthanasia.

Authors:  Karin Powell; Kelly Ethun; Douglas K Taylor
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 12.625

3.  Reactions of laying hens and broilers to different gases used for stunning poultry.

Authors:  A B Webster; D L Fletcher
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Sedation or inhalant anesthesia before euthanasia with CO2 does not reduce behavioral or physiologic signs of pain and stress in mice.

Authors:  Helen Valentine; Wendy O Williams; Kirk J Maurer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  On-farm euthanasia of broiler chickens: effects of different gas mixtures on behavior and brain activity.

Authors:  M A Gerritzen; B Lambooij; H Reimert; A Stegeman; B Spruijt
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The effect of carbon dioxide flow rate on the euthanasia of laboratory mice.

Authors:  C M Moody; B Chua; D M Weary
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Physiological, Behavioral, and Histological Responses of Male C57BL/6N Mice to Different CO2 Chamber Replacement Rates.

Authors:  Gregory P Boivin; Michael A Bottomley; Emily S Dudley; Patricia A Schiml; Christopher N Wyatt; Nadja Grobe
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research.

Authors:  Kp Suresh
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-01

9.  Combining nitrous oxide with carbon dioxide decreases the time to loss of consciousness during euthanasia in mice--refinement of animal welfare?

Authors:  Aurelie A Thomas; Paul A Flecknell; Huw D R Golledge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.