Skin injury is the second most common clinical manifestation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Estrogen may affect the onset and development of SLE through its receptor. In this study, we investigated the role of estrogen membrane receptor G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) in skin injury of SLE. We found that skin injury induced by SLE serum was more severe in female mice and required monocytes. Estrogen promoted activation of monocytes induced by lupus IgG through the membrane receptor GPER1 which was located in lipid rafts. Blockade of GPER1 and lipid rafts reduced skin inflammation induced by SLE serum. The results we obtained suggest that GPER1 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of skin inflammation induced by lupus IgG and might be a therapeutic target in skin lesions of patients with SLE.
Skin injury is the second most common clinical manifestation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Estrogen may affect the onset and development of SLE through its receptor. In this study, we investigated the role of estrogen membrane receptor G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) in skin injury of SLE. We found that skin injury induced by SLE serum was more severe in female mice and required monocytes. Estrogen promoted activation of monocytes induced by lupus IgG through the membrane receptor GPER1 which was located in lipid rafts. Blockade of GPER1 and lipid rafts reduced skin inflammation induced by SLE serum. The results we obtained suggest that GPER1 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of skin inflammation induced by lupus IgG and might be a therapeutic target in skin lesions of patients with SLE.
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by high levels of autoantibodies and multi-organ tissue damage (including the kidney, skin, lungs, brain, and heart) (1, 2). The prevalence of SLE in population ranges from 20 to 150 cases per 100,000, with up to 90% affecting women of childbearing age (3, 4). The female-to-male ratio in prepuberty is 3:1, and this ratio increases to 10:1 during the reproductive age and decreases again to 8:1 after menopause (5). In SLEpatients, serum estrogen levels are much higher than in healthy subjects and correlated with disease severity (6, 7). Using of exogenous estrogen could increase the risk of SLE development in healthy women and exacerbate the disease in SLEpatients and mouse models (8–10). It was reported that in (NZB × NZW)F1 mice, lupus development was strongly influenced by gender, and lupus incidence was higher, and survival time was reduced in female mice compared with males (11). In addition, exogenous estrogens also could accelerate lupus development and autoantibody production in male and female (NZB × NZW)F1 mice (12, 13). These data suggest that estrogen may have an important role in the onset and development of SLE.Estrogens have important influences on several immune functions (14). It has been shown that female sex hormones could affect T cell function and antibody production in B cells. Estrogens are a class of sex steroid hormones that were synthesized from cholesterol. Three forms of physiological estrogens exist in female animals: estrone (E1), estradiol (E2, or 17-β estradiol), and estriol (E3). E2 is the staple product of this process and the most potent estrogen during the childbearing age (15). Estrogen binds two types of receptors, which were named nuclear receptors (ERα and ERβ) and cell membrane receptors [G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) and ER-X], to trigger direct and indirect responses within the cell (16). ERα and ERβ which belong to the superfamily of nuclear receptors are soluble receptors that shuttle between the cytoplasm and the nucleus (17). After binding estrogen-responsive elements (EREs) and recruiting co-regulatory and chromatin remodeling proteins, ERα or ERβ regulates transcription of target genes (18). GPR30 which is now named GPER1 is a seven transmembrane-domain G protein-coupled receptor. As an integral membrane estrogen receptor, GPER1 can elicit rapid estrogen-responsive signaling independent of ERα and ERβ (19).It has been shown that mortality and glomerulonephritis severity were significantly decreased in ERα-deficient female (NZB × NZW)F1 mice (20), and ERα activation has an immunostimulatory role in murine lupus, whereas ERβ activation performs mild immunosuppressive effects (21). In human studies, it has been found that polymorphisms of ERα but not ERβ may be associated with susceptibility or development of SLE (22, 23). These data suggest that ERα plays a main role in mediating the effects of estrogens in SLE. However, the role of estrogen membrane receptor GPER1 in the onset and development of SLE remains unclear.In the patients with SLE, skin injury is the second most common clinical manifestation (24). However, the role of estrogen in the development of skin inflammation is not well known. In this study, we investigated the role and mechanism of estrogen in the development of skin inflammation in SLE. We found that estrogen could promote the development of skin injury induced by SLE serum through GPER1 and that lipid rafts serve an important function in the regulatory effect of GPER1 in skin inflammation induced by SLEIgG.
Materials and Methods
Information of SLE Patients
A total of 398 SLEpatients hospitalized in The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College between January 2010 and December 2011 were recruited. All patients fulfilled at least four of the American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE (25). The local ethics committee approved the protocol and written informed consents were obtained.
Mice and Reagents
The Csf-1-deficient mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory, and C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Nanjing University. All mice were housed in the animal facility of Nanjing Medical University.Sera of SLEpatients were collected from The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. We adopt the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology as the classification of SLE. All patients had SLE disease-activity index scores ranging from 0 to 20.Protein G agarose was purchased from Millipore. FITC-conjugated CTB, methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) and β-estradiol 6-(O-carboxy-methyl)oxime: BSA (E2-BSA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. G15 was purchased from TOCRIS bioscience. ICI 182,780 (Fulvestrant), a specific antagonist of nuclear estrogen receptors, was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.Anti-CD11b, TNF-α, and MCP-1 antibodies were purchased from Abcam. Anti-phospho-NF-kB p65rabbit mAb, NF-κB p65rabbit mAb, and GAPDHrabbit mAb antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-CD3, CD20, GPER1, and CD64 antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Injection Protocol
Systemic lupus erythematosus serum (100 µl) or SLEIgG (50 μg/100 μl) was injected intradermally in the back of the neck of treated mice and PBS (100 µl) was used as control. MβCD (1 mg/mouse, in a volume of 100 µl) or G15 (2 μg/mouse, in a volume of 100 µl) were intraperitoneally injected three times a week for 2 weeks before SLE serum injection. Control mice received the same volume of the PBS.
Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Examination of Skin Lesions
Histopathological examination of skin tissue was performed as described earlier (26). After routine fixation and paraffin embedding, tissue sections from skin were cut and stained with H&E. The slides were coded and evaluated in a blinded manner. Skin inflammation severity was scored as described before (26).After deparaffinization and Ag retrieval, the skin tissues were stained with antibodies to CD3, CD11b, CD20, α-NAE, MCP-1, and TNF-α followed by incubation with biotinylated secondary antibodies, avidin–biotin–peroxidase complexes, and 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole-containing H2O2. All sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (26).
Monocyte Differentiation into Dendritic Cells (DCs)
Mononuclear cells isolated from spleens of C57BL/6 mice were incubated in 24-well plates at 37°C for 3 h and then monocytes were obtained after removing suspended lymphocytes. Monocytes were cultured in DMEM medium with 5% FBS, on 37°C, and 5% CO2. Monocytes were stimulated with SLE serum or SLEIgG for 3 and 48 h. Then, we examined the differentiation of monocytes into DCs by light microscopy. RAW264.7 cells were cultured in DMEM medium with 5% FBS, on 37°C, and 5% CO2.
Measurement of MCP-1 and TNF-α
The levels of MCP-1 and TNF-α in supernatants were determined by using a mouseMCP-1 Flex cytokine kit, mouse TNF-α Flex cytokine kit and cytometric bead array according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences).
Western Blotting and Coimmunoprecipitation
Raw264.7 cells were lysed in RIPA buffer, and the supernatants of homogenates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes and stained for p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 and GAPDH.Raw264.7 cells were lysed in RIPA buffer, and homogenates were incubated with protein G beads pre-absorbed with anti-CD64 antibody. Pre- and post-CD64-immunoprecipitated supernatants and anti-CD64 beads were subjected to SDS-PAGE, blotted onto PVDF membranes, and stained for GPER1.
Immunofluorescent Staining
After fixing with 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS and cytospuning onto slides, monocytes were permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100 for 5 min at room temperature and blocked with PBS containing 10% normal goat serum for 1 h. Then, the cells were incubated with primary antibodies (CD64 or GPER1) in 0.5% BSA at room temperature for 45 min. The cells were washed after incubating with a secondary antibody and FITC-conjugated CTB for 45 min; the slides were washed three times by PBS. After staining the nuclei with DAPI for 5 min, the slides were mounted with a coverslip using Fluoromount-G, and cells were observed using a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope (26).
Statistics
Statistical evaluations of skin inflammation severity, levels of MCP-1 and TNF-α were performed using Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Estrogen Is Involved in the Pathogenesis of SLE
Because females have high estrogen levels, we investigated female SLEpatients to determine the role of estrogen in the pathogenesis of SLE. We investigated 398 SLEpatients and found that 374 (94.0%) of the patients were females and 279 (83.7%) were in the childbearing age (18–45 years) (Table 1). These data suggest that estrogen may play a role in the pathogenesis of SLE.
Table 1
The demographics of systemic lupus erythematosus patients.
Sex
Female
Male
374
24
Age (years)
Median
34.5 ± 13.4
31.8 ± 13.9
Range
10–69
13–76
<18
23 (6.1%)
2
18–45
313 (83.7%)
20
>45
38 (10.2%)
2
The demographics of systemic lupus erythematosuspatients.To further investigate whether estrogen regulates SLE-related organ and tissue damage, we used an animal model in which SLE serum is administered to induce skin inflammation (26). We injected SLE serum intradermally in female and male C57BL/6 mice. Histopathological examination demonstrated that resulting skin lesions were more severe in female mice than in males (Figure 1A). These data suggest that female mice are more susceptible to SLE serum-induced skin inflammation and estrogen may be involved in the pathogenesis of skin inflammation in SLE. We also use serum from healthy volunteer as negative controls and we did not find skin inflammation induced by healthy volunteer and PBS (Figure S1 in Supplementary Material).
Figure 1
Analysis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) serum-induced skin inflammation in mice and the role of monocytes in this progress. (A) Representative histopathological photomicrograph of the severity and incidence of skin inflammation in female and male C57BL/6 mice sacrificed 3 days after intradermal inoculation of serum (100 µl) from SLE patients (n = 8 per group). H&E, original magnification 20×. (B) Immunohistochemical staining for CD3, CD11b, CD20, and α-NAE expression in skin lesions of C57BL/6 mice 3 days after intradermal inoculation of serum (100 µl) from SLE patients (the scoring system: 0, no positive cells; 1, 1–5 positive cells; 2, 6–10 positive cells; 3, 10–20 positive cells; 4, >20 positive cells in a field). (C) Severity and picture of SLE serum-induced skin inflammation in female Csf-1−/− mice and wild-type mice (n = 5 per group) 3 days after intradermal inoculation of serum (100 µl) from SLE patients. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for MCP-1 and TNF-α expression in skin lesions of C57BL/6 mice 3 days after intradermal inoculation of SLE serum. *P < 0.05.
Analysis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) serum-induced skin inflammation in mice and the role of monocytes in this progress. (A) Representative histopathological photomicrograph of the severity and incidence of skin inflammation in female and male C57BL/6 mice sacrificed 3 days after intradermal inoculation of serum (100 µl) from SLEpatients (n = 8 per group). H&E, original magnification 20×. (B) Immunohistochemical staining for CD3, CD11b, CD20, and α-NAE expression in skin lesions of C57BL/6 mice 3 days after intradermal inoculation of serum (100 µl) from SLEpatients (the scoring system: 0, no positive cells; 1, 1–5 positive cells; 2, 6–10 positive cells; 3, 10–20 positive cells; 4, >20 positive cells in a field). (C) Severity and picture of SLE serum-induced skin inflammation in female Csf-1−/− mice and wild-type mice (n = 5 per group) 3 days after intradermal inoculation of serum (100 µl) from SLEpatients. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for MCP-1 and TNF-α expression in skin lesions of C57BL/6 mice 3 days after intradermal inoculation of SLE serum. *P < 0.05.
Monocytes Contribute to the Development of SLE Serum-Induced Skin Inflammation
Because estrogen may regulate the severity of SLE serum-induced skin inflammation, we investigated the role of its immune cell targets in this regulatory effect. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that there were abundant CD11b+ cells but very few CD3+, CD20+, and α-NAE+ cells in skin lesions (Figure 1B). These data indicate that monocytes/macrophages may play an important role in the development of SLE serum-induced skin inflammation. Previous work has shown that monocytes/macrophages, but not lymphocytes, were important in the development of this inflammation (26). To further verify the role of monocytes/macrophages in SLE serum-induced skin inflammation, we tried to induce skin inflammation in Csf-1−/− mice lacking mature monocytes. Compared to wild-type mice, we found that the severity and incidence of skin inflammation decreased significantly in Csf-1−/− mice (Figure 1C). In addition, the expression of MCP-1 and TNF-α was increased in skin lesions of mice (Figure 1D). These data suggest that monocytes may play an important role in the development of SLE serum-induced skin inflammation.
Lipid Rafts Have an Important Regulatory Role in the Activity of Monocytes Triggered by SLE IgG
Lipid rafts are sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich domains of the plasma membrane that contain various signaling and transport proteins (27). These domains contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of organ and tissue damage in lupus-prone mice (28). Based on this information, we next investigated whether SLE serum triggered lipid raft aggregation on monocytes. We found that clustering of lipid rafts developed on monocytes 3 and 48 h after SLE serum treatment (Figure 2A). These data suggest that SLE serum-induced lipid raft clustering on monocytes.
Figure 2
Lipid rafts are important in the process of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgG-induced differentiation of monocytes into dendritic cells (DCs). (A) Confocal microscopy analysis of lipid raft clustering using FITC-conjugated CTB in monocytes cultured with SLE serum or medium control for 3 and 48 h. The arrows represent typical clustered lipid rafts. (B,C) Representative photographs of monocytes cultured with SLE serum with or without methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) for 48 h (B) or SLE IgG with or without MβCD for 48 h (C). Original magnification 20× and the arrows represent typical differentiation of monocytes into DCs. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for CD64 (FcγRI) expression in skin lesions of C57BL/6 mice 3 days after intradermal inoculation of SLE serum. The arrows represent CD64+ cells. (E) Confocal microscopy analysis of colocalization of CD64 and lipid rafts in monocytes cultured with medium control, SLE IgG, SLE IgG, and MβCD for 3 h. The arrows represent the cells which were analyzed. (F) Western blot analysis of expression of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 and GAPDH in Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLE IgG, SLE IgG + MβCD, or MβCD for 30 min. (G,H) CBA-measured levels of MCP-1 or TNFα in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLE IgG, SLE IgG + MβCD, or MβCD for 24 h. *P < 0.05.
Lipid rafts are important in the process of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgG-induced differentiation of monocytes into dendritic cells (DCs). (A) Confocal microscopy analysis of lipid raft clustering using FITC-conjugated CTB in monocytes cultured with SLE serum or medium control for 3 and 48 h. The arrows represent typical clustered lipid rafts. (B,C) Representative photographs of monocytes cultured with SLE serum with or without methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) for 48 h (B) or SLEIgG with or without MβCD for 48 h (C). Original magnification 20× and the arrows represent typical differentiation of monocytes into DCs. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for CD64 (FcγRI) expression in skin lesions of C57BL/6 mice 3 days after intradermal inoculation of SLE serum. The arrows represent CD64+ cells. (E) Confocal microscopy analysis of colocalization of CD64 and lipid rafts in monocytes cultured with medium control, SLEIgG, SLEIgG, and MβCD for 3 h. The arrows represent the cells which were analyzed. (F) Western blot analysis of expression of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 and GAPDH in Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLEIgG, SLEIgG + MβCD, or MβCD for 30 min. (G,H) CBA-measured levels of MCP-1 or TNFα in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLEIgG, SLEIgG + MβCD, or MβCD for 24 h. *P < 0.05.Because SLE serum can induce differentiation of monocytes into DCs (26), we next investigated whether depletion of lipid rafts using MβCD would affect this differentiation. We found that lipid raft depletion inhibited both SLE serum-induced and SLEIgG-induced monocyte differentiation into DCs (Figures 2B,C). These data indicate that lipid rafts have an important role in monocyte differentiation into DCs.To understand how lipid rafts regulate the effects of SLEIgG which is major contributor in SLE serum-induced skin inflammation, we assessed whether they contained Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) which are IgG receptors (29). First, we analyzed the expression of FcγRI (CD64) in skin lesions induced by SLE serum and found a large amount of CD64+ cells (Figure 2D). Then, we analyzed whether lipid rafts contain CD64. We observed colocalization of CD64 and lipid rafts in monocytes treated with SLEIgG and this colocalization was abolished by MβCD treatment (Figure 2E).To further characterize the regulatory role of lipid rafts in the expression of intracellular signaling molecules induced by SLEIgG, we analyzed the expression of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 in Raw264.7 cells. We found that SLEIgG increased levels of p-NF-κB p65, MCP-1, and TNF-α in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells (Figures 2F–H). Conversely, MβCD decreased the expression of p-NF-κB p65, MCP-1, and TNF-α. These results indicate that lipid rafts are important in the expression of inflammatory and intracellular signaling molecules in monocytes triggered by SLEIgG.
E2 Promotes Activation of SLE IgG-Induced Monocytes via the Membrane Receptor GPER1
Estrogens exert their functions by binding nuclear receptors (ERα and ERβ) that act as ligand-dependent transcription factors or by binding membrane-bound receptors (GPR30 and ER-X) that initiate signal transduction pathways (16). Although several studies have shown that ERα plays a major role in mediating the effects of estrogens in SLE (20, 21), there are no data to describe the role of the estrogen cell membrane receptor GPER1 (also called GPR30) in SLE. To determine the role of GPER1 in SLE, we used E2-BSA, an activator specifically bound to GPER1.First, we investigated whether monocytes express GPER1. We found a number of GPER1+ cells in the skin lesions induced by SLE serum (Figure 3A). We also saw GPER1 expression in monocytes from C57BL/6 mice and Raw264.7 cells by western blotting, and there was no significant difference of GPER1 expression between female and male mice (Figure 3B). Next, we determined whether E2-BSA regulates the activity of monocytes triggered by SLEIgG. We observed that SLEIgG or SLEIgG with E2-BSA could induce monocyte differentiation into DCs but not E2-BSA alone (Figure 3C). There were no significant differences between cells treated with SLEIgG or SLEIgG with E2-BSA. These data indicate that E2-BSA alone did not enhance SLEIgG-induced monocyte differentiation into DCs.
Figure 3
E2 promotes activation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgG-induced monocytes via the membrane receptor G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1). (A) Immunohistochemical staining for GPER1 expression in skin lesions of C57BL/6 mice 3 days after intradermal inoculation of SLE serum. The arrows represent GPER1+ cells. (B) Western blot-measured GPER1 expression in Raw264.7 cells and monocytes from C57BL/6 mice. (C) Representative photographs of monocytes cultured with medium control, E2-BSA, SLE IgG, or SLE IgG + E2-BSA for 48 h. Monocytes were isolated from spleen of C57BL/6 mice. Original magnification 20× and the arrows represent typical differentiation of monocytes into dendritic cells. (D) Western blot-measured levels of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 in Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLE IgG, E2-BSA, or SLE IgG + E2-BSA for 30 min. (E) CBA-measured levels MCP-1 or TNF-α in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLE IgG, E2-BSA, or SLE IgG + E2-BSA for 24 h. *P < 0.05. (F) Western blot-measured levels of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 in Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLE IgG + E2-BSA, SLE IgG + E2-BSA + G15, or G15 for 30 min. (G) CBA-measured levels of MCP-1 or TNF-α in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLE IgG + E2-BSA, SLE IgG + E2-BSA + G15, or G15 for 24 h.
E2 promotes activation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgG-induced monocytes via the membrane receptor G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1). (A) Immunohistochemical staining for GPER1 expression in skin lesions of C57BL/6 mice 3 days after intradermal inoculation of SLE serum. The arrows represent GPER1+ cells. (B) Western blot-measured GPER1 expression in Raw264.7 cells and monocytes from C57BL/6 mice. (C) Representative photographs of monocytes cultured with medium control, E2-BSA, SLEIgG, or SLEIgG + E2-BSA for 48 h. Monocytes were isolated from spleen of C57BL/6 mice. Original magnification 20× and the arrows represent typical differentiation of monocytes into dendritic cells. (D) Western blot-measured levels of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 in Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLEIgG, E2-BSA, or SLEIgG + E2-BSA for 30 min. (E) CBA-measured levels MCP-1 or TNF-α in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLEIgG, E2-BSA, or SLEIgG + E2-BSA for 24 h. *P < 0.05. (F) Western blot-measured levels of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 in Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLEIgG + E2-BSA, SLEIgG + E2-BSA + G15, or G15 for 30 min. (G) CBA-measured levels of MCP-1 or TNF-α in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells treated with medium control, SLEIgG + E2-BSA, SLEIgG + E2-BSA + G15, or G15 for 24 h.To investigate the effect of E2-BSA on expression of intracellular signaling molecules induced by SLEIgG, we analyzed the expression of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 in Raw264.7 cells treated with SLEIgG in the presence or absence of E2-BSA. We found that E2-BSA increased levels of p-NF-κB p65 induced by SLEIgG compared with the cells treated with SLEIgG only (Figure 3D). We also measured the levels of MCP-1 and TNF-α in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells treated with SLEIgG in presence or absence of E2-BSA for 24 h and found that E2-BSA increased levels of MCP-1 and TNF-α triggered by SLEIgG (Figure 3E). To further confirm the effect of estrogen membrane receptor on SLEIgG, we used G15, a specific antagonist of GPER1 (30). We found that G15 abolished the effect of E2-BSA on expression of p-NF-κB p65 (Figure 3F) and expression of MCP-1 and TNF-α triggered by SLEIgG (Figure 3G).To further determine whether estrogen nuclear receptors regulate activation of NF-κB p65 triggered by SLEIgG, we blocked the effect of ERα and ERβ by using ICI 182,780 (Fulvestrant), a specific antagonist of nuclear estrogen receptors. We found that blockade of estrogen nuclear receptors did not inhibit the effect of E2-BSA on activation of NF-κB p65 triggered by SLEIgG (Figure S2A in Supplementary Material).In addition, we further investigated the effects of estrogen and G15 on activation of NF-κB p65 triggered by SLEIgG. We found that E2, E2-BSA, or G15 did not directly activate NF-κB p65; E2-BSA enhanced but G15 decreased activation of NF-κB p65 triggered by SLEIgG; E2 did not affect levels of p-NF-κB p65 induced by SLEIgG (Figure S2B in Supplementary Material). These results indicate that estrogen membrane receptor not nuclear receptors promote activation of NF-κB p65 triggered by SLEIgG.To determine whether GPER1 activation enhances skin inflammation induced by SLE serum, we treated mice with intradermal injection of SLE serum in the presence or absence of E2-BSA. As shown in Figure S3 in Supplementary Material, E2-BSA alone did not induce skin inflammation, but enhanced the skin inflammation induced by SLE serum. These data suggest that activated membrane receptor of estrogen may promote skin inflammation induced by SLE serum.
E2 Promotes Activation of SLE IgG-Induced Monocytes through Lipid Rafts
E2 promotes SLEIgG-induced monocyte activation and cytokine production via GPER1 but the mechanism was still unknown. We hypothesized that GPER1 might bind to CD64 to promote this process. We used coimmunoprecipitation to identify the relationship between GPER1 and CD64. As shown in Figure 4A, we did not find direct binding of GPER1 and CD64.
Figure 4
E2 promotes activation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgG-induced monocytes and skin inflammation through lipid rafts. (A) Relationship of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) and CD64 measured by western blot and immunoprecipitation in Raw264.7 cells. (B) Immunofluorescent staining of GPER1 and lipid rafts or CD64 and lipid rafts on monocytes treated with SLE IgG. (C) Western blot-measured levels of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 in Raw264.7 cells treated with medium, SLE IgG + E2-BSA, SLE IgG + E2-BSA + methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD), or MβCD for 30 min. (D,E) CBA-measured levels of MCP-1 (D) or TNF-α (E) in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells treated with medium, SLE IgG + E2-BSA, SLE IgG + E2-BSA + MβCD, or MβCD for 24 h. (F) Histopathological photomicrograph and severity of skin inflammation in female C57BL/6 mice treated with or without G15 and sacrificed 3 days after intradermal inoculation of SLE serum. G15 at dose of 2 µg was administered intraperitoneally three times a week for 2 weeks (n = 10 per group). (G) Histopathological photomicrograph and severity of skin inflammation in female C57BL/6 mice treated with or without MβCD (1 mg/mouse three times a week, i.p., for 2 weeks) sacrificed 3 days after intradermal inoculation of serum (100 µl) from a SLE patient (n = 8 per group). H&E, original magnification 20×. *P < 0.05.
E2 promotes activation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgG-induced monocytes and skin inflammation through lipid rafts. (A) Relationship of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) and CD64 measured by western blot and immunoprecipitation in Raw264.7 cells. (B) Immunofluorescent staining of GPER1 and lipid rafts or CD64 and lipid rafts on monocytes treated with SLEIgG. (C) Western blot-measured levels of p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 in Raw264.7 cells treated with medium, SLEIgG + E2-BSA, SLEIgG + E2-BSA + methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD), or MβCD for 30 min. (D,E) CBA-measured levels of MCP-1 (D) or TNF-α (E) in supernatants of Raw264.7 cells treated with medium, SLEIgG + E2-BSA, SLEIgG + E2-BSA + MβCD, or MβCD for 24 h. (F) Histopathological photomicrograph and severity of skin inflammation in female C57BL/6 mice treated with or without G15 and sacrificed 3 days after intradermal inoculation of SLE serum. G15 at dose of 2 µg was administered intraperitoneally three times a week for 2 weeks (n = 10 per group). (G) Histopathological photomicrograph and severity of skin inflammation in female C57BL/6 mice treated with or without MβCD (1 mg/mouse three times a week, i.p., for 2 weeks) sacrificed 3 days after intradermal inoculation of serum (100 µl) from a SLEpatient (n = 8 per group). H&E, original magnification 20×. *P < 0.05.Because GPER1 and CD64 are membrane receptors and we have shown that CD64 localized in clustered lipid rafts in SLE serum-treated monocytes, we investigated whether clustered lipid rafts contain GPER1 and CD64. We found that GPER1 and CD64 colocalized with clustered lipid rafts in SLE serum-treated monocytes (Figure 4B). These results indicate that lipid rafts serve as platforms for the interaction between GPER1 and CD64. To confirm this point, we used MβCD to inhibit the lipid raft clustering in Raw264.7 cells treated with SLEIgG in the presence or absence of E2-BSA. We found that MβCD decreased levels of p-NF-κB p65 trigged by SLEIgG with E2-BSA (Figure 4C). We also found that MβCD inhibited the effect of E2-BSA on SLEIgG-induced expression of MCP-1 and TNF-α (Figures 4D,E). These results indicated that E2 promoted SLEIgG-induced monocyte activation through lipid rafts.
Inhibition of GPER1 and Lipid Rafts Reduced SLE Serum-Induced Skin Inflammation
We have shown that G15 and MβCD could inhibit SLEIgG-induced monocyte activation and cytokine production. Here, we investigated the effect of G15 and MβCD in SLE serum-induced skin inflammation. We found that the severity of SLE serum-induced skin inflammation was significantly decreased in the mice treated with G15 (Figure 4F) and mice treated with MβCD (Figure 4G). In addition, we analyzed the serum E2 levels of female mice treated with MβCD or G15. There was no significant difference between the control mice (PBS treated) and MβCD or G15 treated mice (data not shown). These data indicate that inhibition of GPER1 and lipid rafts reduced SLE serum-induced skin inflammation.
Discussion
Our study demonstrates that there is a higher incidence of SLE and more severe skin inflammation induced by SLE serum in female mice. We showed that monocytes are important in the development of SLE serum-induced skin inflammation and estrogen may enhance the activity of monocytes and SLE serum-induced skin inflammation through the membrane receptor GPER1. We also showed that lipid rafts exert an important role in estrogen mediating effects through GPER1.Although the pathogenesis of SLE remains unclear, several lines of evidence suggest that SLE may be caused by immunological abnormalities including loss of B cell tolerance, abnormal interactions between T and B cell signaling, hyperactivity of immune cells, production of pathogenic autoantibodies, and defective clearance of auto-antigens and immune complexes (1, 31). The factor enhancing these abnormalities may promote pathological progression of SLE.The observed female prevalence is highest after puberty. In (NZB × NZW) F1 (NZB/w F1) mice, the disease is more serious and has an earlier onset and higher mortality rate in females (32). This evidence suggests that estrogen may be involved in the onset and development of SLE. In this study, we examined 398 SLEpatients and found that the female-to-male ratio was 15.5:1 and that 279 patients (83.7%) were in their reproductive age (18–45 years). Female mice had more serious skin lesions induced by SLE serum than males. Our data indicate that estrogen may play an important role in the development of SLE serum-induced skin inflammation.We have previously reported that monocytes play a crucial role in the development of SLE serum-induced skin inflammation and that SLE serum IgG can induce monocyte differentiation into DCs (26). In this study, we confirmed our previous results. In addition, we found out that SLEIgG increased the levels of signaling molecules of cell activation (p-NF-κB p65) and inflammatory cytokines (MCP-1 and TNF-α) produced in monocytes. And we also found that FcγRs, which are widely expressed on cells throughout the hematopoietic system (33), were expressed on monocytes and that FcγRI (CD64) was expressed in skin lesions induced by SLE serum.It has been shown that estrogens could modulate lymphoid cell growth and differentiation, activation and proliferation, cytokine secretion, and antibody production (14). Estrogens have been demonstrated to promote the pathological progression of SLE by inhibiting activation-induced apoptosis of SLE T cells through downregulating the Fas-L expression (34) and enhancing autoantibody levels in autoimmune diseases (35). Estrogens can also stimulate the production of IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10 in macrophages and T cells (36). Estrogen exerts its effects by binding two types of receptors: nuclear receptors and cell membrane receptors (16). After binding EREs and recruiting coregulatory and chromatin remodeling proteins, ERα or ERβ could regulate the transcription of target genes (18). GPER1 is an integral membrane estrogen receptor that can trigger rapid estrogen-responsive signaling independent of ERα and ERβ (19). Our study indicates that GPER1 also plays an important role in skin injury of SLE. E2-BSA, which specifically binds to GPER1, increased the activation of monocytes and the production of inflammatory cytokines induced by SLEIgG and these effects were inhibited by G15, a specific GPER1 antagonist. On the other hand, a specific antagonist of nuclear estrogen receptors (ICI 182,780) did not inhibit the effect of E2-BSA on expression of p-NF-κB p65 induced by SLEIgG. In addition, we found that E2-BSA augmented skin inflammation induced by SLE serum and blockade of GPER1 reduced skin inflammation induced by SLE serum. These results indicate that estrogen promotes the monocyte activation induced by SLEIgG and skin inflammation induced by SLE serum through the membrane receptor GPER1 but not nuclear receptors.Systemic lupus erythematosusIgG exerts its effect by binding FcγR on cell membrane. Our study supports that GPER1 regulates the effect of FcγR through lipid rafts. Lipid rafts which contain various signaling and transport proteins are sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich domains of the plasma membrane (27). It has been reported that lipid rafts regulate the pathogenesis of organ and tissue damage in lupus-prone mice (28), play an important role in mediating the transport of substrates across the plasma membrane (27, 37, 38). In this study, we found that SLEIgG triggered lipid raft aggregation in monocytes and MβCD could inhibit the clustering of lipid rafts and monocyte differentiation into DCs. MβCD also inhibited monocyte activation and inflammatory cytokine production induced by SLEIgG. In addition, we demonstrated that aggregated lipid rafts contained CD64 and GPER1.Our study suggests that the membrane estrogen receptorGPER1 is involved in the pathological progression of SLE and that estrogen may promote skin injury introduced by SLE serum through membrane receptor GPER1. Furthermore, lipid rafts play an important regulatory role in the effect of estrogen on the pathological progression of SLE through GPER1.
Ethics Statement
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of “IACUC of Nanjing Medical University” with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the “IACUC of Nanjing Medical University.” For statements involving animal subjects, please use: this study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of “IACUC of guidelines, Nanjing Medical University of committee.” The protocol was approved by the “Nanjing Medical University of committee.”
Author Contributions
ZC, CX, and G-MD conceived the idea and designed the research. ZC, XL, WQ, XG, HL, XF, XF, and G-MD initiated the study and drafted the manuscript; ZC and CX conducted the experiments; ZC, XL, CX, and G-MD analyzed the results. All the authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Authors: Megan K Dennis; Ritwik Burai; Chinnasamy Ramesh; Whitney K Petrie; Sara N Alcon; Tapan K Nayak; Cristian G Bologa; Andrei Leitao; Eugen Brailoiu; Elena Deliu; Nae J Dun; Larry A Sklar; Helen J Hathaway; Jeffrey B Arterburn; Tudor I Oprea; Eric R Prossnitz Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: B S Andrews; R A Eisenberg; A N Theofilopoulos; S Izui; C B Wilson; P J McConahey; E D Murphy; J B Roths; F J Dixon Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1978-11-01 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Miguel A Ortega; Cielo García-Montero; Oscar Fraile-Martinez; Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon; Ana Maria Gómez-Lahoz; Guillermo Lahera; Jorge Monserrat; Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez; Javier Quintero; Melchor Álvarez-Mon Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2022-06-28