Literature DB >> 29254673

Perioperative chemotherapy for bladder cancer in the general population: Are practice patterns finally changing?

Christopher M Booth1, Safiya Karim2, Kelly Brennan3, David Robert Siemens4, Yingwei Peng5, William J Mackillop6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uptake of perioperative chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has been historically poor. We describe contemporary use of neoadjuvant (NACT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) as well as medical oncology (MO) referral patterns in routine practice.
METHODS: Electronic treatment records were linked to the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry to identify all MIBC patients treated with cystectomy in Ontario 1994 to 2013. Physician billing records were used to identify consultation with MO. Practice patterns in the contemporary era (2009-2013) are compared with data from 1994 to 2008.
RESULTS: A total of 5,582 patients had cystectomy for MIBC. Use of NACT increased from 4% in 1994 to 2008 to 19% in 2009 to 2013 (P<0.001); rates continued to rise in the most recent era from 12% in 2009 to 27% in 2013 (P<0.001). ACT was delivered to 20% of patients in 2009 to 2013 (19% in 1994-2008, P = 0.875). Use of any chemotherapy (NACT or ACT) in 2009 to 2013 was 35% compared to 23% in 1994 to 2008 (P<0.001). Preoperative referral rates during 2009 to 2013 to MO were greater than 1994 to 2008 (32% vs. 11%, P<0.001); referral rates continued to increase in recent years from 21% in 2009 to 44% in 2013 (P<0.001). The proportion of referred patients ultimately treated with NACT increased substantially; from 32% in 1994 to 1998 to 54% in 2009 to 2013 (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: After many years of practice lagging behind evidence, use of NACT in the general population has increased substantially. Our results suggest that increased uptake has been driven by greater preoperative referral to MO as well as greater propensity of MOs to treat referred patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Chemotherapy; Cystectomy; Knowledge translation; Multidisciplinary care; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29254673     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  20 in total

1.  Propensity-matched analysis of stage-specific efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Felix V Chen; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Joshua S Jue; Mahmoud Alameddine; Devina J Dave; Sanoj Punnen; Dipen J Parekh; Chad R Ritch; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Peter C Black; Srikala S Sridhar; Anil Kapoor; Alexandre R Zlotta; Bobby Shayegan; Ricardo A Rendon; Peter Chung; Theodorus van der Kwast; Nimira Alimohamed; Yves Fradet; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Underused across the 49th parallel.

Authors:  Michael J Raphael; Christopher M Booth
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  A survey of physician perception and practices regarding pharmacological thromboprophylaxis during chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Amenyogbe; Francis Lemire; David Yachnin; Marc Carrier; Kristen McAlpine; Rodney H Breau; Dominick Bossé; Tzu-Fei Wang; Christopher Morash; Ilias Cagiannos; Luke T Lavallée
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.052

5.  Trimodal therapy vs. radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Kool; Ivan Yanev; Tarek Hijal; Marie Vanhuyse; Fabio L Cury; Luis Souhami; Wassim Kassouf; Alice Dragomir
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.052

6.  Histology at transurethral resection of bladder tumor and radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Insights from population-based data.

Authors:  Tina Dyer; D Robert Siemens; Pria Nippak; Julien Meyer; Christopher M Booth
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  The use of perioperative chemotherapy in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Quebec, Canada, 2000-2016.

Authors:  Michel D Wissing; Wassim Kassouf; Simon Tanguay; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Understanding the Barriers to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Juan J Andino; Michael Sessine; Udit Singhal; Zachery R Reichert; Daniel Wray; Christine Shafer; Marissa Moore; Alon Z Weizer; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Lindsey A Herrel; Todd M Morgan; Khaled Z Hafez; Jeffrey S Montgomery
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2020-10-14

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition vs. cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ali Raza Khaki; Yong Shan; Richard E Nelson; Sapna Kaul; John L Gore; Petros Grivas; Stephen B Williams
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.954

Review 10.  Nanotechnology in Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Mahmood Barani; Seyedeh Maryam Hosseinikhah; Abbas Rahdar; Leila Farhoudi; Rabia Arshad; Magali Cucchiarini; Sadanand Pandey
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.