Literature DB >> 29254529

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Methods to Communicate and Disseminate Clinical Preventive Services Recommendations.

Ann E Kurth1, Alex H Krist2, Amanda E Borsky3, Linda Ciofu Baumann4, Susan J Curry5, Karina W Davidson6, Chyke A Doubeni7, John W Epling8, Tina Fan9, Francisco A R García10, Jessica Herzstein11, William R Phillips12, Michael P Pignone13, Chien-Wen Tseng14, Rachel Weinstein15.   

Abstract

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issues evidence-based screening and prevention recommendations, and key to this task is dissemination and implementation of these recommendations. The Task Force has recommendations for more than 84 topics; each USPSTF Recommendation Statement includes a letter grade, a topline summary to guide clinician interpretation in practice, and a summary of gaps in evidence to help catalyze clinically relevant research. The USPSTF aims to update existing topics regularly and considers new topics to add each year. Clearly communicating and disseminating each recommendation is a critical task to ensure maximum benefit from use of the recommendations. The primary USPSTF audience is primary care clinicians. Over time, other audiences have become interested in the USPSTF and these entities have broad and diverse needs, necessitating a range of communication platforms and approaches. This includes engagement with and input from topic experts, primary care and federal partners, and the public to help shape the development of the recommendations. It also includes engagement of partners to disseminate USPSTF recommendations to help ensure that the primary care workforce remains up-to-date on USPSTF recommendations. This paper outlines the approaches used by the USPSTF to both solicit input (e.g., public comment periods), as well as to facilitate dissemination of its recommendations to help improve the health of all Americans (e.g., web-based and mobile application tools, journal publications, and annual reports to Congress). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29254529     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  5 in total

1.  Reducing Health Disparities Through Prevention: Role of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Matthew J O'Brien; Kate A Kirley; Ronald T Ackermann
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Why Was the US Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation So Objectionable? A Historical Analysis.

Authors:  Barron H Lerner; Graham Curtiss-Rowlands
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  What Constitutes Evidence? Colorectal Cancer Screening and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Barron H Lerner; Graham Curtiss-Rowlands
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.473

4.  Priorities among effective clinical preventive services in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Hans Krueger; Sylvia Robinson; Trevor Hancock; Richard Birtwhistle; Jane A Buxton; Bonnie Henry; Jennifer Scarr; John J Spinelli
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  Half a Century of Wilson & Jungner: Reflections on the Governance of Population Screening.

Authors:  Steve Sturdy; Fiona Miller; Stuart Hogarth; Natalie Armstrong; Pranesh Chakraborty; Celine Cressman; Mark Dobrow; Kathy Flitcroft; David Grossman; Russell Harris; Barbara Hoebee; Kelly Holloway; Linda Kinsinger; Marlene Krag; Olga Löblová; Ilana Löwy; Anne Mackie; John Marshall; Jane O'Hallahan; Linda Rabeneck; Angela Raffle; Lynette Reid; Graham Shortland; Robert Steele; Beth Tarini; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Bernie Towler; Nynke van der Veen; Marco Zappa
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2020-08-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.