James Jastifer1,2, Kirk A McCullough3. 1. 1 Borgess Orthopedics, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA. 2. 2 Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA. 3. 3 Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Clinic of Kansas City (OSMCKC), Leawood, Kansas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intramedullary screw fixation is a common method of treating proximal metadiaphyseal fifth metatarsal (ie, Jones) fractures. Fatigue failure is a complication of this fixation. There are many screw designs available, including Jones fracture specific fixation, but the optimal choice of screw design is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the fatigue strength of Jones fracture specific screw designs as well as other commonly used screw designs. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in fatigue strength for Jones fracture specific screw designs at similar screw diameters. METHODS: A study was performed to determine the fatigue bending strength of 5 different screw designs including Jones fracture specific screw designs at 3 different screw diameters. Six screws of each size and design underwent cyclic fatigue testing, and a median fatigue limit (MFL) was determined for each screw design and size. RESULTS: The Stryker Asnis JFX solid 4.0-mm, 5.0-mm, and 6.0-mm screws had a higher MFL than all other screws with similar diameter tested (all P < .0001). Both Jones fracture specific screw designs (Stryker Asnis JFX solid screws and Charlotte Carolina Jones screws) had higher MFLs than the other screw designs tested. CONCLUSION: This study provides comparative fatigue strength data on larger screw diameters, which have not been previously reported. There was a statistically significant difference in screw fatigue properties at the screw diameters tested. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The clinical significance of this study is that it provides surgeons with fatigue strength data to aid in screw selection for Jones fracture fixation.
BACKGROUND: Intramedullary screw fixation is a common method of treating proximal metadiaphyseal fifth metatarsal (ie, Jones) fractures. Fatigue failure is a complication of this fixation. There are many screw designs available, including Jones fracture specific fixation, but the optimal choice of screw design is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the fatigue strength of Jones fracture specific screw designs as well as other commonly used screw designs. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in fatigue strength for Jones fracture specific screw designs at similar screw diameters. METHODS: A study was performed to determine the fatigue bending strength of 5 different screw designs including Jones fracture specific screw designs at 3 different screw diameters. Six screws of each size and design underwent cyclic fatigue testing, and a median fatigue limit (MFL) was determined for each screw design and size. RESULTS: The Stryker Asnis JFX solid 4.0-mm, 5.0-mm, and 6.0-mm screws had a higher MFL than all other screws with similar diameter tested (all P < .0001). Both Jones fracture specific screw designs (Stryker Asnis JFX solid screws and Charlotte Carolina Jones screws) had higher MFLs than the other screw designs tested. CONCLUSION: This study provides comparative fatigue strength data on larger screw diameters, which have not been previously reported. There was a statistically significant difference in screw fatigue properties at the screw diameters tested. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The clinical significance of this study is that it provides surgeons with fatigue strength data to aid in screw selection for Jones fracture fixation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Jones fracture fixation; Jones screw; fatigue testing