Sheina Emrani1, David J Libon1, Melissa Lamar2, Catherine C Price3, Angela L Jefferson4, Katherine A Gifford4, Timothy J Hohman4, Daniel A Nation5, Lisa Delano-Wood6,7, Amy Jak6,7, Katherine J Bangen6,7, Mark W Bondi6,7, Adam M Brickman8, Jennifer Manly8, Rodney Swenson9, Rhoda Au10. 1. Departments of Geriatrics, Gerontology and Psychology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan University-School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA. 2. Department of Behavioral Sciences and the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 4. Vanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA. 7. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. 8. Department of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 9. University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA. 10. Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) is often assessed with serial order tests such as repeating digits backward. In prior dementia research using the Backward Digit Span Test (BDT), only aggregate test performance was examined. OBJECTIVE: The current research tallied primacy/recency effects, out-of-sequence transposition errors, perseverations, and omissions to assess WM deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: Memory clinic patients (n = 66) were classified into three groups: single domain amnestic MCI (aMCI), combined mixed domain/dysexecutive MCI (mixed/dys MCI), and non-MCI where patients did not meet criteria for MCI. Serial order/WM ability was assessed by asking participants to repeat 7 trials of five digits backwards. Serial order position accuracy, transposition errors, perseverations, and omission errors were tallied. RESULTS: A 3 (group)×5 (serial position) repeated measures ANOVA yielded a significant group×trial interaction. Follow-up analyses found attenuation of the recency effect for mixed/dys MCI patients. Mixed/dys MCI patients scored lower than non-MCI patients for serial position 3 (p < 0.003) serial position 4 (p < 0.002); and lower than both group for serial position 5 (recency; p < 0.002). Mixed/dys MCI patients also produced more transposition errors than both groups (p < 0.010); and more omissions (p < 0.020), and perseverations errors (p < 0.018) than non-MCI patients. CONCLUSIONS: The attenuation of a recency effect using serial order parameters obtained from the BDT may provide a useful operational definition as well as additional diagnostic information regarding working memory deficits in MCI.
BACKGROUND:Working memory (WM) is often assessed with serial order tests such as repeating digits backward. In prior dementia research using the Backward Digit Span Test (BDT), only aggregate test performance was examined. OBJECTIVE: The current research tallied primacy/recency effects, out-of-sequence transposition errors, perseverations, and omissions to assess WM deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: Memory clinic patients (n = 66) were classified into three groups: single domain amnestic MCI (aMCI), combined mixed domain/dysexecutive MCI (mixed/dys MCI), and non-MCI where patients did not meet criteria for MCI. Serial order/WM ability was assessed by asking participants to repeat 7 trials of five digits backwards. Serial order position accuracy, transposition errors, perseverations, and omission errors were tallied. RESULTS: A 3 (group)×5 (serial position) repeated measures ANOVA yielded a significant group×trial interaction. Follow-up analyses found attenuation of the recency effect for mixed/dys MCIpatients. Mixed/dys MCIpatients scored lower than non-MCI patients for serial position 3 (p < 0.003) serial position 4 (p < 0.002); and lower than both group for serial position 5 (recency; p < 0.002). Mixed/dys MCIpatients also produced more transposition errors than both groups (p < 0.010); and more omissions (p < 0.020), and perseverations errors (p < 0.018) than non-MCI patients. CONCLUSIONS: The attenuation of a recency effect using serial order parameters obtained from the BDT may provide a useful operational definition as well as additional diagnostic information regarding working memory deficits in MCI.
Entities:
Keywords:
Boston process approach; digit span; executive functions; mild cognitive impairment; serial order; working memory
Authors: Bruno B Averbeck; Matthew V Chafee; David A Crowe; Apostolos P Georgopoulos Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-09-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mark W Bondi; Emily C Edmonds; Amy J Jak; Lindsay R Clark; Lisa Delano-Wood; Carrie R McDonald; Daniel A Nation; David J Libon; Rhoda Au; Douglas Galasko; David P Salmon Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Brianne M Bettcher; Dan Mungas; Nihar Patel; Jonathan Elofson; Shubir Dutt; Matthew Wynn; Christa L Watson; Melanie Stephens; Christine M Walsh; Joel H Kramer Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Lisa Delano-Wood; Norm Abeles; Joshua M Sacco; Christina E Wierenga; Nikki R Horne; Andrea Bozoki Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Victor Wasserman; Sheina Emrani; Emily F Matusz; David Miller; Kelly Davis Garrett; Katherine A Gifford; Timothy J Hohman; Angela L Jefferson; Rhoda Au; Rod Swenson; David J Libon Journal: Innov Aging Date: 2019-05-03
Authors: Qinghai Liu; Kristina Shkirkova; Krista Lamorie-Foote; Michelle Connor; Arati Patel; Robin Babadjouni; Mikko Huuskonen; Axel Montagne; Hans Baertsch; Hongqiao Zhang; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Wendy J Mack; Brian P Walcott; Berislav V Zlokovic; Constantinos Sioutas; Todd E Morgan; Caleb E Finch; William J Mack Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2021-08-23 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Antara Banerji; Jamie W Sleigh; Logan J Voss; Paul S Garcia; Amy L Gaskell Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 5.702