Alona Zer1, Rebecca M Prince2, Eitan Amir3, Albiruni R Abdul Razak2. 1. Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. Electronic address: alonaz@clalit.org.il. 2. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 3. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite a lack of improvement in overall survival (OS) with doxorubicin-based combinations over doxorubicin alone in advanced STS, the role of multi-agent chemotherapy remains poorly defined. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate benefits and harms of multi-agent chemotherapy in advanced STS. Eligible studies were randomized trials of chemotherapy in advanced STS comparing single agent to multi-agent therapy. Data from studies reporting a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Meta-regression was utilized to explore the association between efficacy (OS and PFS) and both toxicity and dose intensity. RESULTS: We identified 22 trials published between 1974 and April 2016 and comprising 5044 patients. Overall, multi-agent chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR:0.79, p = 0.02), and borderline improvement in PFS (HR:0.86, p = 0.05). While the effect on OS was similar in trials with non-anthracycline controls compared to those with anthracycline controls (HR for OS 0.73 vs. 0.82, p for difference = 0.63) there was a non-significantly greater effect for multi-agent chemotherapy on PFS in non-anthracycline RCT (HR for PFS 0.73 vs. 0.91, p for difference = 0.13). Compared to studies with cytotoxic therapy-based multi-agent therapy, a non-significantly greater magnitude of effect among studies with biological/cytostatic experimental groups was seen (HR for OS 0.64 vs. 0.86, p for difference = 0.37). There was a borderline significant association between dose reductions (which were more common in combination arms) and worse PFS (beta = 0.70, p = 0.053). CONCLUSION: Multi-agent chemotherapy is associated with a modest, but statistically significant improvement in outcomes in STS. Combining chemotherapy with non-cytotoxic agents might represent a promising strategy.
BACKGROUND: Despite a lack of improvement in overall survival (OS) with doxorubicin-based combinations over doxorubicin alone in advanced STS, the role of multi-agent chemotherapy remains poorly defined. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate benefits and harms of multi-agent chemotherapy in advanced STS. Eligible studies were randomized trials of chemotherapy in advanced STS comparing single agent to multi-agent therapy. Data from studies reporting a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Meta-regression was utilized to explore the association between efficacy (OS and PFS) and both toxicity and dose intensity. RESULTS: We identified 22 trials published between 1974 and April 2016 and comprising 5044 patients. Overall, multi-agent chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR:0.79, p = 0.02), and borderline improvement in PFS (HR:0.86, p = 0.05). While the effect on OS was similar in trials with non-anthracycline controls compared to those with anthracycline controls (HR for OS 0.73 vs. 0.82, p for difference = 0.63) there was a non-significantly greater effect for multi-agent chemotherapy on PFS in non-anthracycline RCT (HR for PFS 0.73 vs. 0.91, p for difference = 0.13). Compared to studies with cytotoxic therapy-based multi-agent therapy, a non-significantly greater magnitude of effect among studies with biological/cytostatic experimental groups was seen (HR for OS 0.64 vs. 0.86, p for difference = 0.37). There was a borderline significant association between dose reductions (which were more common in combination arms) and worse PFS (beta = 0.70, p = 0.053). CONCLUSION: Multi-agent chemotherapy is associated with a modest, but statistically significant improvement in outcomes in STS. Combining chemotherapy with non-cytotoxic agents might represent a promising strategy.
Authors: Denis L Jardim; Débora De Melo Gagliato; Mina Nikanjam; Donald A Barkauskas; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Danielle S Graham; Ritchell van Dams; Nicholas J Jackson; Mykola Onyshchenko; Mark A Eckardt; Benjamin J DiPardo; Scott D Nelson; Bartosz Chmielowski; Jacob E Shabason; Arun S Singh; Fritz C Eilber; Anusha Kalbasi Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 6.639