Literature DB >> 29253254

Dissociated Representations of Deceptive Intentions and Kinematic Adaptations in the Observer's Motor System.

Alessandra Finisguerra1, Lucia Amoruso1, Stergios Makris2, Cosimo Urgesi1,3.   

Abstract

Previous studies showed that observing deceptive actions modulates the activity of the observer's motor system. However, it is unclear whether this modulation reflects the coding of deceptive intentions or the mapping of the kinematic adaptations required to attain deceptive actions. Here, we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure cortico-spinal excitability (CSE) from hand and forearm muscles while participants predicted the weight of cubes lifted by actors who received truthful information on the object weight and provided 1) truthful (truthful actions) or 2) deceptive (deceptive actions) cues to the observers or 3) who received fooling information and were asked to provide truthful cues (deceived actions). This way, we independently manipulated actor's intentions and kinematic adaptations. We found that, as compared to truthful action observation, CSE increased during observation of deceptive actions, but decreased during observation of deceived actions. Importantly, while the CSE enhancement in response to deceptive intentions lacked muscle specificity, perceiving kinematic alterations in the deceived condition affected CSE only for the hand muscle involved in kinematic adaptations to unexpected object weight. This suggests that actor's intentions and movement kinematics may be coded by the observer's motor system at different hierarchical levels of action representation.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action observation; action prediction; deceptive intention; motor cortex; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29253254     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  10 in total

1.  Human but not robotic gaze facilitates action prediction.

Authors:  Emmanuele Tidoni; Henning Holle; Michele Scandola; Igor Schindler; Loron Hill; Emily S Cross
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 2.  Low or High-Level Motor Coding? The Role of Stimulus Complexity.

Authors:  Lucia Amoruso; Alessandra Finisguerra
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Implicit preference towards slim bodies and weight-stigma modulate the understanding of observed familiar actions.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Stergios Makris
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-06-08

4.  Observer-Agent Kinematic Similarity Facilitates Action Intention Decoding.

Authors:  Doriana De Marco; Emilia Scalona; Maria Chiara Bazzini; Pietro Avanzini; Maddalena Fabbri-Destro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Development of visual perception of others' actions: Children's judgment of lifted weight.

Authors:  Alessandra Sciutti; Laura Patanè; Giulio Sandini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Observation of Both Skilled and Erroneous Object Lifting Can Improve Predictive Force Scaling in the Observer.

Authors:  Guy Rens; Marco Davare
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Gaze and body cues interplay during interactive requests.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Umberto Castiello; Silvia Guerra; Umberto Granziol; Giovanni Zani; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Autistic traits predict poor integration between top-down contextual expectations and movement kinematics during action observation.

Authors:  L Amoruso; A Finisguerra; C Urgesi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The last chance to pass the ball: investigating the role of temporal expectation and motor resonance in processing temporal errors in motor actions.

Authors:  Ludovico Pedullà; Elisa Gervasoni; Ambra Bisio; Monica Biggio; Piero Ruggeri; Laura Avanzino; Marco Bove
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Implicit visual sensitivity towards slim versus overweight bodies modulates motor resonance in the primary motor cortex: A tDCS study.

Authors:  Stergios Makris; Valentina Cazzato
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.526

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.